aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/CodingStandards.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authormike-m <mikem.llvm@gmail.com>2010-05-06 23:45:43 +0000
committermike-m <mikem.llvm@gmail.com>2010-05-06 23:45:43 +0000
commit68cb31901c590cabceee6e6356d62c84142114cb (patch)
tree6444bddc975b662fbe47d63cd98a7b776a407c1a /docs/CodingStandards.html
parentc26ae5ab7e2d65b67c97524e66f50ce86445dec7 (diff)
downloadexternal_llvm-68cb31901c590cabceee6e6356d62c84142114cb.zip
external_llvm-68cb31901c590cabceee6e6356d62c84142114cb.tar.gz
external_llvm-68cb31901c590cabceee6e6356d62c84142114cb.tar.bz2
Overhauled llvm/clang docs builds. Closes PR6613.
NOTE: 2nd part changeset for cfe trunk to follow. *** PRE-PATCH ISSUES ADDRESSED - clang api docs fail build from objdir - clang/llvm api docs collide in install PREFIX/ - clang/llvm main docs collide in install - clang/llvm main docs have full of hard coded destination assumptions and make use of absolute root in static html files; namely CommandGuide tools hard codes a website destination for cross references and some html cross references assume website root paths *** IMPROVEMENTS - bumped Doxygen from 1.4.x -> 1.6.3 - splits llvm/clang docs into 'main' and 'api' (doxygen) build trees - provide consistent, reliable doc builds for both main+api docs - support buid vs. install vs. website intentions - support objdir builds - document targets with 'make help' - correct clean and uninstall operations - use recursive dir delete only where absolutely necessary - added call function fn.RMRF which safeguards against botched 'rm -rf'; if any target (or any variable is evaluated) which attempts to remove any dirs which match a hard-coded 'safelist', a verbose error will be printed and make will error-stop. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@103213 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/CodingStandards.html')
-rw-r--r--docs/CodingStandards.html1353
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1353 deletions
diff --git a/docs/CodingStandards.html b/docs/CodingStandards.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 7815e19..0000000
--- a/docs/CodingStandards.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,1353 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
- "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
-<html>
-<head>
- <link rel="stylesheet" href="llvm.css" type="text/css">
- <title>LLVM Coding Standards</title>
-</head>
-<body>
-
-<div class="doc_title">
- LLVM Coding Standards
-</div>
-
-<ol>
- <li><a href="#introduction">Introduction</a></li>
- <li><a href="#mechanicalissues">Mechanical Source Issues</a>
- <ol>
- <li><a href="#sourceformating">Source Code Formatting</a>
- <ol>
- <li><a href="#scf_commenting">Commenting</a></li>
- <li><a href="#scf_commentformat">Comment Formatting</a></li>
- <li><a href="#scf_includes"><tt>#include</tt> Style</a></li>
- <li><a href="#scf_codewidth">Source Code Width</a></li>
- <li><a href="#scf_spacestabs">Use Spaces Instead of Tabs</a></li>
- <li><a href="#scf_indentation">Indent Code Consistently</a></li>
- </ol></li>
- <li><a href="#compilerissues">Compiler Issues</a>
- <ol>
- <li><a href="#ci_warningerrors">Treat Compiler Warnings Like
- Errors</a></li>
- <li><a href="#ci_portable_code">Write Portable Code</a></li>
- <li><a href="#ci_class_struct">Use of class/struct Keywords</a></li>
- </ol></li>
- </ol></li>
- <li><a href="#styleissues">Style Issues</a>
- <ol>
- <li><a href="#macro">The High Level Issues</a>
- <ol>
- <li><a href="#hl_module">A Public Header File <b>is</b> a
- Module</a></li>
- <li><a href="#hl_dontinclude">#include as Little as Possible</a></li>
- <li><a href="#hl_privateheaders">Keep "internal" Headers
- Private</a></li>
- <li><a href="#hl_earlyexit">Use Early Exits and 'continue' to Simplify
- Code</a></li>
- <li><a href="#hl_else_after_return">Don't use "else" after a
- return</a></li>
- <li><a href="#hl_predicateloops">Turn Predicate Loops into Predicate
- Functions</a></li>
- </ol></li>
- <li><a href="#micro">The Low Level Issues</a>
- <ol>
- <li><a href="#ll_assert">Assert Liberally</a></li>
- <li><a href="#ll_ns_std">Do not use 'using namespace std'</a></li>
- <li><a href="#ll_virtual_anch">Provide a virtual method anchor for
- classes in headers</a></li>
- <li><a href="#ll_end">Don't evaluate end() every time through a
- loop</a></li>
- <li><a href="#ll_iostream"><tt>#include &lt;iostream&gt;</tt> is
- <em>forbidden</em></a></li>
- <li><a href="#ll_avoidendl">Avoid <tt>std::endl</tt></a></li>
- <li><a href="#ll_raw_ostream">Use <tt>raw_ostream</tt></a</li>
- </ol></li>
-
- <li><a href="#nano">Microscopic Details</a>
- <ol>
- <li><a href="#micro_spaceparen">Spaces Before Parentheses</a></li>
- <li><a href="#micro_preincrement">Prefer Preincrement</a></li>
- <li><a href="#micro_namespaceindent">Namespace Indentation</a></li>
- <li><a href="#micro_anonns">Anonymous Namespaces</a></li>
- </ol></li>
-
-
- </ol></li>
- <li><a href="#seealso">See Also</a></li>
-</ol>
-
-<div class="doc_author">
- <p>Written by <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a></p>
-</div>
-
-
-<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_section">
- <a name="introduction">Introduction</a>
-</div>
-<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>This document attempts to describe a few coding standards that are being used
-in the LLVM source tree. Although no coding standards should be regarded as
-absolute requirements to be followed in all instances, coding standards can be
-useful.</p>
-
-<p>This document intentionally does not prescribe fixed standards for religious
-issues such as brace placement and space usage. For issues like this, follow
-the golden rule:</p>
-
-<blockquote>
-
-<p><b><a name="goldenrule">If you are adding a significant body of source to a
-project, feel free to use whatever style you are most comfortable with. If you
-are extending, enhancing, or bug fixing already implemented code, use the style
-that is already being used so that the source is uniform and easy to
-follow.</a></b></p>
-
-</blockquote>
-
-<p>The ultimate goal of these guidelines is the increase readability and
-maintainability of our common source base. If you have suggestions for topics to
-be included, please mail them to <a
-href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris</a>.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_section">
- <a name="mechanicalissues">Mechanical Source Issues</a>
-</div>
-<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
- <a name="sourceformating">Source Code Formatting</a>
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="scf_commenting">Commenting</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>Comments are one critical part of readability and maintainability. Everyone
-knows they should comment, so should you. When writing comments, write them as
-English prose, which means they should use proper capitalization, punctuation,
-etc. Although we all should probably
-comment our code more than we do, there are a few very critical places that
-documentation is very useful:</p>
-
-<b>File Headers</b>
-
-<p>Every source file should have a header on it that describes the basic
-purpose of the file. If a file does not have a header, it should not be
-checked into Subversion. Most source trees will probably have a standard
-file header format. The standard format for the LLVM source tree looks like
-this:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-//===-- llvm/Instruction.h - Instruction class definition -------*- C++ -*-===//
-//
-// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
-//
-// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
-// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-//
-// This file contains the declaration of the Instruction class, which is the
-// base class for all of the VM instructions.
-//
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>A few things to note about this particular format: The "<tt>-*- C++
--*-</tt>" string on the first line is there to tell Emacs that the source file
-is a C++ file, not a C file (Emacs assumes .h files are C files by default).
-Note that this tag is not necessary in .cpp files. The name of the file is also
-on the first line, along with a very short description of the purpose of the
-file. This is important when printing out code and flipping though lots of
-pages.</p>
-
-<p>The next section in the file is a concise note that defines the license
-that the file is released under. This makes it perfectly clear what terms the
-source code can be distributed under and should not be modified in any way.</p>
-
-<p>The main body of the description does not have to be very long in most cases.
-Here it's only two lines. If an algorithm is being implemented or something
-tricky is going on, a reference to the paper where it is published should be
-included, as well as any notes or "gotchas" in the code to watch out for.</p>
-
-<b>Class overviews</b>
-
-<p>Classes are one fundamental part of a good object oriented design. As such,
-a class definition should have a comment block that explains what the class is
-used for... if it's not obvious. If it's so completely obvious your grandma
-could figure it out, it's probably safe to leave it out. Naming classes
-something sane goes a long ways towards avoiding writing documentation.</p>
-
-
-<b>Method information</b>
-
-<p>Methods defined in a class (as well as any global functions) should also be
-documented properly. A quick note about what it does and a description of the
-borderline behaviour is all that is necessary here (unless something
-particularly tricky or insidious is going on). The hope is that people can
-figure out how to use your interfaces without reading the code itself... that is
-the goal metric.</p>
-
-<p>Good things to talk about here are what happens when something unexpected
-happens: does the method return null? Abort? Format your hard disk?</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="scf_commentformat">Comment Formatting</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>In general, prefer C++ style (<tt>//</tt>) comments. They take less space,
-require less typing, don't have nesting problems, etc. There are a few cases
-when it is useful to use C style (<tt>/* */</tt>) comments however:</p>
-
-<ol>
- <li>When writing a C code: Obviously if you are writing C code, use C style
- comments.</li>
- <li>When writing a header file that may be <tt>#include</tt>d by a C source
- file.</li>
- <li>When writing a source file that is used by a tool that only accepts C
- style comments.</li>
-</ol>
-
-<p>To comment out a large block of code, use <tt>#if 0</tt> and <tt>#endif</tt>.
-These nest properly and are better behaved in general than C style comments.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="scf_includes"><tt>#include</tt> Style</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>Immediately after the <a href="#scf_commenting">header file comment</a> (and
-include guards if working on a header file), the <a
-href="#hl_dontinclude">minimal</a> list of <tt>#include</tt>s required by the
-file should be listed. We prefer these <tt>#include</tt>s to be listed in this
-order:</p>
-
-<ol>
- <li><a href="#mmheader">Main Module header</a></li>
- <li><a href="#hl_privateheaders">Local/Private Headers</a></li>
- <li><tt>llvm/*</tt></li>
- <li><tt>llvm/Analysis/*</tt></li>
- <li><tt>llvm/Assembly/*</tt></li>
- <li><tt>llvm/Bytecode/*</tt></li>
- <li><tt>llvm/CodeGen/*</tt></li>
- <li>...</li>
- <li><tt>Support/*</tt></li>
- <li><tt>Config/*</tt></li>
- <li>System <tt>#includes</tt></li>
-</ol>
-
-<p>... and each category should be sorted by name.</p>
-
-<p><a name="mmheader">The "Main Module Header"</a> file applies to .cpp file
-which implement an interface defined by a .h file. This <tt>#include</tt>
-should always be included <b>first</b> regardless of where it lives on the file
-system. By including a header file first in the .cpp files that implement the
-interfaces, we ensure that the header does not have any hidden dependencies
-which are not explicitly #included in the header, but should be. It is also a
-form of documentation in the .cpp file to indicate where the interfaces it
-implements are defined.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="scf_codewidth">Source Code Width</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>Write your code to fit within 80 columns of text. This helps those of us who
-like to print out code and look at your code in an xterm without resizing
-it.</p>
-
-<p>The longer answer is that there must be some limit to the width of the code
-in order to reasonably allow developers to have multiple files side-by-side in
-windows on a modest display. If you are going to pick a width limit, it is
-somewhat arbitrary but you might as well pick something standard. Going with
-90 columns (for example) instead of 80 columns wouldn't add any significant
-value and would be detrimental to printing out code. Also many other projects
-have standardized on 80 columns, so some people have already configured their
-editors for it (vs something else, like 90 columns).</p>
-
-<p>This is one of many contentious issues in coding standards, but is not up
-for debate.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="scf_spacestabs">Use Spaces Instead of Tabs</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>In all cases, prefer spaces to tabs in source files. People have different
-preferred indentation levels, and different styles of indentation that they
-like... this is fine. What isn't is that different editors/viewers expand tabs
-out to different tab stops. This can cause your code to look completely
-unreadable, and it is not worth dealing with.</p>
-
-<p>As always, follow the <a href="#goldenrule">Golden Rule</a> above: follow the
-style of existing code if your are modifying and extending it. If you like four
-spaces of indentation, <b>DO NOT</b> do that in the middle of a chunk of code
-with two spaces of indentation. Also, do not reindent a whole source file: it
-makes for incredible diffs that are absolutely worthless.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="scf_indentation">Indent Code Consistently</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>Okay, your first year of programming you were told that indentation is
-important. If you didn't believe and internalize this then, now is the time.
-Just do it.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
- <a name="compilerissues">Compiler Issues</a>
-</div>
-
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="ci_warningerrors">Treat Compiler Warnings Like Errors</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>If your code has compiler warnings in it, something is wrong: you aren't
-casting values correctly, your have "questionable" constructs in your code, or
-you are doing something legitimately wrong. Compiler warnings can cover up
-legitimate errors in output and make dealing with a translation unit
-difficult.</p>
-
-<p>It is not possible to prevent all warnings from all compilers, nor is it
-desirable. Instead, pick a standard compiler (like <tt>gcc</tt>) that provides
-a good thorough set of warnings, and stick to them. At least in the case of
-<tt>gcc</tt>, it is possible to work around any spurious errors by changing the
-syntax of the code slightly. For example, an warning that annoys me occurs when
-I write code like this:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-if (V = getValue()) {
- ...
-}
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p><tt>gcc</tt> will warn me that I probably want to use the <tt>==</tt>
-operator, and that I probably mistyped it. In most cases, I haven't, and I
-really don't want the spurious errors. To fix this particular problem, I
-rewrite the code like this:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-if ((V = getValue())) {
- ...
-}
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>...which shuts <tt>gcc</tt> up. Any <tt>gcc</tt> warning that annoys you can
-be fixed by massaging the code appropriately.</p>
-
-<p>These are the <tt>gcc</tt> warnings that I prefer to enable: <tt>-Wall
--Winline -W -Wwrite-strings -Wno-unused</tt></p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="ci_portable_code">Write Portable Code</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>In almost all cases, it is possible and within reason to write completely
-portable code. If there are cases where it isn't possible to write portable
-code, isolate it behind a well defined (and well documented) interface.</p>
-
-<p>In practice, this means that you shouldn't assume much about the host
-compiler, including its support for "high tech" features like partial
-specialization of templates. If these features are used, they should only be
-an implementation detail of a library which has a simple exposed API.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
-<a name="ci_class_struct">Use of <tt>class</tt> and <tt>struct</tt> Keywords</a>
-</div>
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>In C++, the <tt>class</tt> and <tt>struct</tt> keywords can be used almost
-interchangeably. The only difference is when they are used to declare a class:
-<tt>class</tt> makes all members private by default while <tt>struct</tt> makes
-all members public by default.</p>
-
-<p>Unfortunately, not all compilers follow the rules and some will generate
-different symbols based on whether <tt>class</tt> or <tt>struct</tt> was used to
-declare the symbol. This can lead to problems at link time.</p>
-
-<p>So, the rule for LLVM is to always use the <tt>class</tt> keyword, unless
-<b>all</b> members are public and the type is a C++ "POD" type, in which case
-<tt>struct</tt> is allowed.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_section">
- <a name="styleissues">Style Issues</a>
-</div>
-<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-
-
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
- <a name="macro">The High Level Issues</a>
-</div>
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="hl_module">A Public Header File <b>is</b> a Module</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>C++ doesn't do too well in the modularity department. There is no real
-encapsulation or data hiding (unless you use expensive protocol classes), but it
-is what we have to work with. When you write a public header file (in the LLVM
-source tree, they live in the top level "include" directory), you are defining a
-module of functionality.</p>
-
-<p>Ideally, modules should be completely independent of each other, and their
-header files should only include the absolute minimum number of headers
-possible. A module is not just a class, a function, or a namespace: <a
-href="http://www.cuj.com/articles/2000/0002/0002c/0002c.htm">it's a collection
-of these</a> that defines an interface. This interface may be several
-functions, classes or data structures, but the important issue is how they work
-together.</p>
-
-<p>In general, a module should be implemented with one or more <tt>.cpp</tt>
-files. Each of these <tt>.cpp</tt> files should include the header that defines
-their interface first. This ensure that all of the dependences of the module
-header have been properly added to the module header itself, and are not
-implicit. System headers should be included after user headers for a
-translation unit.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="hl_dontinclude"><tt>#include</tt> as Little as Possible</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p><tt>#include</tt> hurts compile time performance. Don't do it unless you
-have to, especially in header files.</p>
-
-<p>But wait, sometimes you need to have the definition of a class to use it, or
-to inherit from it. In these cases go ahead and <tt>#include</tt> that header
-file. Be aware however that there are many cases where you don't need to have
-the full definition of a class. If you are using a pointer or reference to a
-class, you don't need the header file. If you are simply returning a class
-instance from a prototyped function or method, you don't need it. In fact, for
-most cases, you simply don't need the definition of a class... and not
-<tt>#include</tt>'ing speeds up compilation.</p>
-
-<p>It is easy to try to go too overboard on this recommendation, however. You
-<b>must</b> include all of the header files that you are using -- you can
-include them either directly
-or indirectly (through another header file). To make sure that you don't
-accidentally forget to include a header file in your module header, make sure to
-include your module header <b>first</b> in the implementation file (as mentioned
-above). This way there won't be any hidden dependencies that you'll find out
-about later...</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="hl_privateheaders">Keep "internal" Headers Private</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>Many modules have a complex implementation that causes them to use more than
-one implementation (<tt>.cpp</tt>) file. It is often tempting to put the
-internal communication interface (helper classes, extra functions, etc) in the
-public module header file. Don't do this.</p>
-
-<p>If you really need to do something like this, put a private header file in
-the same directory as the source files, and include it locally. This ensures
-that your private interface remains private and undisturbed by outsiders.</p>
-
-<p>Note however, that it's okay to put extra implementation methods a public
-class itself... just make them private (or protected), and all is well.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="hl_earlyexit">Use Early Exits and 'continue' to Simplify Code</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>When reading code, keep in mind how much state and how many previous
-decisions have to be remembered by the reader to understand a block of code.
-Aim to reduce indentation where possible when it doesn't make it more difficult
-to understand the code. One great way to do this is by making use of early
-exits and the 'continue' keyword in long loops. As an example of using an early
-exit from a function, consider this "bad" code:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-Value *DoSomething(Instruction *I) {
- if (!isa&lt;TerminatorInst&gt;(I) &amp;&amp;
- I-&gt;hasOneUse() &amp;&amp; SomeOtherThing(I)) {
- ... some long code ....
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>This code has several problems if the body of the 'if' is large. When you're
-looking at the top of the function, it isn't immediately clear that this
-<em>only</em> does interesting things with non-terminator instructions, and only
-applies to things with the other predicates. Second, it is relatively difficult
-to describe (in comments) why these predicates are important because the if
-statement makes it difficult to lay out the comments. Third, when you're deep
-within the body of the code, it is indented an extra level. Finally, when
-reading the top of the function, it isn't clear what the result is if the
-predicate isn't true, you have to read to the end of the function to know that
-it returns null.</p>
-
-<p>It is much preferred to format the code like this:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-Value *DoSomething(Instruction *I) {
- // Terminators never need 'something' done to them because, ...
- if (isa&lt;TerminatorInst&gt;(I))
- return 0;
-
- // We conservatively avoid transforming instructions with multiple uses
- // because goats like cheese.
- if (!I-&gt;hasOneUse())
- return 0;
-
- // This is really just here for example.
- if (!SomeOtherThing(I))
- return 0;
-
- ... some long code ....
-}
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>This fixes these problems. A similar problem frequently happens in for
-loops. A silly example is something like this:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- for (BasicBlock::iterator II = BB-&gt;begin(), E = BB-&gt;end(); II != E; ++II) {
- if (BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast&lt;BinaryOperator&gt;(II)) {
- Value *LHS = BO-&gt;getOperand(0);
- Value *RHS = BO-&gt;getOperand(1);
- if (LHS != RHS) {
- ...
- }
- }
- }
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>When you have very very small loops, this sort of structure is fine, but if
-it exceeds more than 10-15 lines, it becomes difficult for people to read and
-understand at a glance.
-The problem with this sort of code is that it gets very nested very quickly,
-meaning that the reader of the code has to keep a lot of context in their brain
-to remember what is going immediately on in the loop, because they don't know
-if/when the if conditions will have elses etc. It is strongly preferred to
-structure the loop like this:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- for (BasicBlock::iterator II = BB-&gt;begin(), E = BB-&gt;end(); II != E; ++II) {
- BinaryOperator *BO = dyn_cast&lt;BinaryOperator&gt;(II);
- if (!BO) continue;
-
- Value *LHS = BO-&gt;getOperand(0);
- Value *RHS = BO-&gt;getOperand(1);
- if (LHS == RHS) continue;
- }
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>This has all the benefits of using early exits from functions: it reduces
-nesting of the loop, it makes it easier to describe why the conditions are true,
-and it makes it obvious to the reader that there is no "else" coming up that
-they have to push context into their brain for. If a loop is large, this can
-be a big understandability win.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="hl_else_after_return">Don't use "else" after a return</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>For similar reasons above (reduction of indentation and easier reading),
- please do not use "else" or "else if" after something that interrupts
- control flow like return, break, continue, goto, etc. For example, this is
- "bad":</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- case 'J': {
- if (Signed) {
- Type = Context.getsigjmp_bufType();
- if (Type.isNull()) {
- Error = ASTContext::GE_Missing_sigjmp_buf;
- return QualType();
- } else {
- break;
- }
- } else {
- Type = Context.getjmp_bufType();
- if (Type.isNull()) {
- Error = ASTContext::GE_Missing_jmp_buf;
- return QualType();
- } else {
- break;
- }
- }
- }
- }
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>It is better to write this something like:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- case 'J':
- if (Signed) {
- Type = Context.getsigjmp_bufType();
- if (Type.isNull()) {
- Error = ASTContext::GE_Missing_sigjmp_buf;
- return QualType();
- }
- } else {
- Type = Context.getjmp_bufType();
- if (Type.isNull()) {
- Error = ASTContext::GE_Missing_jmp_buf;
- return QualType();
- }
- }
- break;
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>Or better yet (in this case), as:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- case 'J':
- if (Signed)
- Type = Context.getsigjmp_bufType();
- else
- Type = Context.getjmp_bufType();
-
- if (Type.isNull()) {
- Error = Signed ? ASTContext::GE_Missing_sigjmp_buf :
- ASTContext::GE_Missing_jmp_buf;
- return QualType();
- }
- break;
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>The idea is to reduce indentation and the amount of code you have to keep
- track of when reading the code.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="hl_predicateloops">Turn Predicate Loops into Predicate Functions</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>It is very common to write small loops that just compute a boolean
- value. There are a number of ways that people commonly write these, but an
- example of this sort of thing is:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- <b>bool FoundFoo = false;</b>
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = BarList.size(); i != e; ++i)
- if (BarList[i]-&gt;isFoo()) {
- <b>FoundFoo = true;</b>
- break;
- }
-
- <b>if (FoundFoo) {</b>
- ...
- }
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>This sort of code is awkward to write, and is almost always a bad sign.
-Instead of this sort of loop, we strongly prefer to use a predicate function
-(which may be <a href="#micro_anonns">static</a>) that uses
-<a href="#hl_earlyexit">early exits</a> to compute the predicate. We prefer
-the code to be structured like this:
-</p>
-
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-/// ListContainsFoo - Return true if the specified list has an element that is
-/// a foo.
-static bool ListContainsFoo(const std::vector&lt;Bar*&gt; &amp;List) {
- for (unsigned i = 0, e = List.size(); i != e; ++i)
- if (List[i]-&gt;isFoo())
- return true;
- return false;
-}
-...
-
- <b>if (ListContainsFoo(BarList)) {</b>
- ...
- }
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>There are many reasons for doing this: it reduces indentation and factors out
-code which can often be shared by other code that checks for the same predicate.
-More importantly, it <em>forces you to pick a name</em> for the function, and
-forces you to write a comment for it. In this silly example, this doesn't add
-much value. However, if the condition is complex, this can make it a lot easier
-for the reader to understand the code that queries for this predicate. Instead
-of being faced with the in-line details of how we check to see if the BarList
-contains a foo, we can trust the function name and continue reading with better
-locality.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
- <a name="micro">The Low Level Issues</a>
-</div>
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="ll_assert">Assert Liberally</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>Use the "<tt>assert</tt>" function to its fullest. Check all of your
-preconditions and assumptions, you never know when a bug (not necessarily even
-yours) might be caught early by an assertion, which reduces debugging time
-dramatically. The "<tt>&lt;cassert&gt;</tt>" header file is probably already
-included by the header files you are using, so it doesn't cost anything to use
-it.</p>
-
-<p>To further assist with debugging, make sure to put some kind of error message
-in the assertion statement (which is printed if the assertion is tripped). This
-helps the poor debugging make sense of why an assertion is being made and
-enforced, and hopefully what to do about it. Here is one complete example:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-inline Value *getOperand(unsigned i) {
- assert(i &lt; Operands.size() &amp;&amp; "getOperand() out of range!");
- return Operands[i];
-}
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>Here are some examples:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-assert(Ty-&gt;isPointerType() &amp;&amp; "Can't allocate a non pointer type!");
-
-assert((Opcode == Shl || Opcode == Shr) &amp;&amp; "ShiftInst Opcode invalid!");
-
-assert(idx &lt; getNumSuccessors() &amp;&amp; "Successor # out of range!");
-
-assert(V1.getType() == V2.getType() &amp;&amp; "Constant types must be identical!");
-
-assert(isa&lt;PHINode&gt;(Succ-&gt;front()) &amp;&amp; "Only works on PHId BBs!");
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>You get the idea...</p>
-
-<p>Please be aware when adding assert statements that not all compilers are aware of
-the semantics of the assert. In some places, asserts are used to indicate a piece of
-code that should not be reached. These are typically of the form:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-assert(0 &amp;&amp; "Some helpful error message");
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>When used in a function that returns a value, they should be followed with a return
-statement and a comment indicating that this line is never reached. This will prevent
-a compiler which is unable to deduce that the assert statement never returns from
-generating a warning.</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-assert(0 &amp;&amp; "Some helpful error message");
-// Not reached
-return 0;
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="ll_ns_std">Do not use '<tt>using namespace std</tt>'</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-<p>In LLVM, we prefer to explicitly prefix all identifiers from the standard
-namespace with an "<tt>std::</tt>" prefix, rather than rely on
-"<tt>using namespace std;</tt>".</p>
-
-<p> In header files, adding a '<tt>using namespace XXX</tt>' directive pollutes
-the namespace of any source file that <tt>#include</tt>s the header. This is
-clearly a bad thing.</p>
-
-<p>In implementation files (e.g. .cpp files), the rule is more of a stylistic
-rule, but is still important. Basically, using explicit namespace prefixes
-makes the code <b>clearer</b>, because it is immediately obvious what facilities
-are being used and where they are coming from, and <b>more portable</b>, because
-namespace clashes cannot occur between LLVM code and other namespaces. The
-portability rule is important because different standard library implementations
-expose different symbols (potentially ones they shouldn't), and future revisions
-to the C++ standard will add more symbols to the <tt>std</tt> namespace. As
-such, we never use '<tt>using namespace std;</tt>' in LLVM.</p>
-
-<p>The exception to the general rule (i.e. it's not an exception for
-the <tt>std</tt> namespace) is for implementation files. For example, all of
-the code in the LLVM project implements code that lives in the 'llvm' namespace.
-As such, it is ok, and actually clearer, for the .cpp files to have a '<tt>using
-namespace llvm</tt>' directive at their top, after the <tt>#include</tt>s. The
-general form of this rule is that any .cpp file that implements code in any
-namespace may use that namespace (and its parents'), but should not use any
-others.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="ll_virtual_anch">Provide a virtual method anchor for classes
- in headers</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>If a class is defined in a header file and has a v-table (either it has
-virtual methods or it derives from classes with virtual methods), it must
-always have at least one out-of-line virtual method in the class. Without
-this, the compiler will copy the vtable and RTTI into every <tt>.o</tt> file
-that <tt>#include</tt>s the header, bloating <tt>.o</tt> file sizes and
-increasing link times.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="ll_end">Don't evaluate end() every time through a loop</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>Because C++ doesn't have a standard "foreach" loop (though it can be emulated
-with macros and may be coming in C++'0x) we end up writing a lot of loops that
-manually iterate from begin to end on a variety of containers or through other
-data structures. One common mistake is to write a loop in this style:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- BasicBlock *BB = ...
- for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(); I != <b>BB->end()</b>; ++I)
- ... use I ...
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>The problem with this construct is that it evaluates "<tt>BB->end()</tt>"
-every time through the loop. Instead of writing the loop like this, we strongly
-prefer loops to be written so that they evaluate it once before the loop starts.
-A convenient way to do this is like so:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- BasicBlock *BB = ...
- for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = <b>BB->end()</b>; I != E; ++I)
- ... use I ...
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>The observant may quickly point out that these two loops may have different
-semantics: if the container (a basic block in this case) is being mutated, then
-"<tt>BB->end()</tt>" may change its value every time through the loop and the
-second loop may not in fact be correct. If you actually do depend on this
-behavior, please write the loop in the first form and add a comment indicating
-that you did it intentionally.</p>
-
-<p>Why do we prefer the second form (when correct)? Writing the loop in the
-first form has two problems: First it may be less efficient than evaluating it
-at the start of the loop. In this case, the cost is probably minor: a few extra
-loads every time through the loop. However, if the base expression is more
-complex, then the cost can rise quickly. I've seen loops where the end
-expression was actually something like: "<tt>SomeMap[x]->end()</tt>" and map
-lookups really aren't cheap. By writing it in the second form consistently, you
-eliminate the issue entirely and don't even have to think about it.</p>
-
-<p>The second (even bigger) issue is that writing the loop in the first form
-hints to the reader that the loop is mutating the container (a fact that a
-comment would handily confirm!). If you write the loop in the second form, it
-is immediately obvious without even looking at the body of the loop that the
-container isn't being modified, which makes it easier to read the code and
-understand what it does.</p>
-
-<p>While the second form of the loop is a few extra keystrokes, we do strongly
-prefer it.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="ll_iostream"><tt>#include &lt;iostream&gt;</tt> is forbidden</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>The use of <tt>#include &lt;iostream&gt;</tt> in library files is
-hereby <b><em>forbidden</em></b>. The primary reason for doing this is to
-support clients using LLVM libraries as part of larger systems. In particular,
-we statically link LLVM into some dynamic libraries. Even if LLVM isn't used,
-the static c'tors are run whenever an application start up that uses the dynamic
-library. There are two problems with this:</p>
-
-<ol>
- <li>The time to run the static c'tors impacts startup time of
- applications&mdash;a critical time for GUI apps.</li>
- <li>The static c'tors cause the app to pull many extra pages of memory off the
- disk: both the code for the static c'tors in each <tt>.o</tt> file and the
- small amount of data that gets touched. In addition, touched/dirty pages
- put more pressure on the VM system on low-memory machines.</li>
-</ol>
-
-<p>Note that using the other stream headers (<tt>&lt;sstream&gt;</tt> for
-example) is not problematic in this regard (just <tt>&lt;iostream&gt;</tt>).
-However, raw_ostream provides various APIs that are better performing for almost
-every use than std::ostream style APIs, so you should just use it for new
-code.</p>
-
-<p><b>New code should always
-use <a href="#ll_raw_ostream"><tt>raw_ostream</tt></a> for writing, or
-the <tt>llvm::MemoryBuffer</tt> API for reading files.</b></p>
-
-</div>
-
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="ll_avoidendl">Avoid <tt>std::endl</tt></a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>The <tt>std::endl</tt> modifier, when used with iostreams outputs a newline
-to the output stream specified. In addition to doing this, however, it also
-flushes the output stream. In other words, these are equivalent:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-std::cout &lt;&lt; std::endl;
-std::cout &lt;&lt; '\n' &lt;&lt; std::flush;
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>Most of the time, you probably have no reason to flush the output stream, so
-it's better to use a literal <tt>'\n'</tt>.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="ll_raw_ostream">Use <tt>raw_ostream</tt></a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>LLVM includes a lightweight, simple, and efficient stream implementation
-in <tt>llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h</tt> which provides all of the common features
-of <tt>std::ostream</tt>. All new code should use <tt>raw_ostream</tt> instead
-of <tt>ostream</tt>.</p>
-
-<p>Unlike <tt>std::ostream</tt>, <tt>raw_ostream</tt> is not a template and can
-be forward declared as <tt>class raw_ostream</tt>. Public headers should
-generally not include the <tt>raw_ostream</tt> header, but use forward
-declarations and constant references to <tt>raw_ostream</tt> instances.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-<div class="doc_subsection">
- <a name="nano">Microscopic Details</a>
-</div>
-<!-- ======================================================================= -->
-
-<p>This section describes preferred low-level formatting guidelines along with
-reasoning on why we prefer them.</p>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="micro_spaceparen">Spaces Before Parentheses</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>We prefer to put a space before a parentheses only in control flow
-statements, but not in normal function call expressions and function-like
-macros. For example, this is good:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- <b>if (</b>x) ...
- <b>for (</b>i = 0; i != 100; ++i) ...
- <b>while (</b>llvm_rocks) ...
-
- <b>somefunc(</b>42);
- <b><a href="#ll_assert">assert</a>(</b>3 != 4 &amp;&amp; "laws of math are failing me");
-
- a = <b>foo(</b>42, 92) + <b>bar(</b>x);
- </pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>... and this is bad:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- <b>if(</b>x) ...
- <b>for(</b>i = 0; i != 100; ++i) ...
- <b>while(</b>llvm_rocks) ...
-
- <b>somefunc (</b>42);
- <b><a href="#ll_assert">assert</a> (</b>3 != 4 &amp;&amp; "laws of math are failing me");
-
- a = <b>foo (</b>42, 92) + <b>bar (</b>x);
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>The reason for doing this is not completely arbitrary. This style makes
- control flow operators stand out more, and makes expressions flow better. The
- function call operator binds very tightly as a postfix operator. Putting
- a space after a function name (as in the last example) makes it appear that
- the code might bind the arguments of the left-hand-side of a binary operator
- with the argument list of a function and the name of the right side. More
- specifically, it is easy to misread the "a" example as:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
- a = foo <b>(</b>(42, 92) + bar<b>)</b> (x);
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>... when skimming through the code. By avoiding a space in a function, we
-avoid this misinterpretation.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="micro_preincrement">Prefer Preincrement</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>Hard fast rule: Preincrement (<tt>++X</tt>) may be no slower than
-postincrement (<tt>X++</tt>) and could very well be a lot faster than it. Use
-preincrementation whenever possible.</p>
-
-<p>The semantics of postincrement include making a copy of the value being
-incremented, returning it, and then preincrementing the "work value". For
-primitive types, this isn't a big deal... but for iterators, it can be a huge
-issue (for example, some iterators contains stack and set objects in them...
-copying an iterator could invoke the copy ctor's of these as well). In general,
-get in the habit of always using preincrement, and you won't have a problem.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="micro_namespaceindent">Namespace Indentation</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>
-In general, we strive to reduce indentation where ever possible. This is useful
-because we want code to <a href="#scf_codewidth">fit into 80 columns</a> without
-wrapping horribly, but also because it makes it easier to understand the code.
-Namespaces are a funny thing: they are often large, and we often desire to put
-lots of stuff into them (so they can be large). Other times they are tiny,
-because they just hold an enum or something similar. In order to balance this,
-we use different approaches for small versus large namespaces.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-If a namespace definition is small and <em>easily</em> fits on a screen (say,
-less than 35 lines of code), then you should indent its body. Here's an
-example:
-</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-namespace llvm {
- namespace X86 {
- /// RelocationType - An enum for the x86 relocation codes. Note that
- /// the terminology here doesn't follow x86 convention - word means
- /// 32-bit and dword means 64-bit.
- enum RelocationType {
- /// reloc_pcrel_word - PC relative relocation, add the relocated value to
- /// the value already in memory, after we adjust it for where the PC is.
- reloc_pcrel_word = 0,
-
- /// reloc_picrel_word - PIC base relative relocation, add the relocated
- /// value to the value already in memory, after we adjust it for where the
- /// PIC base is.
- reloc_picrel_word = 1,
-
- /// reloc_absolute_word, reloc_absolute_dword - Absolute relocation, just
- /// add the relocated value to the value already in memory.
- reloc_absolute_word = 2,
- reloc_absolute_dword = 3
- };
- }
-}
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>Since the body is small, indenting adds value because it makes it very clear
-where the namespace starts and ends, and it is easy to take the whole thing in
-in one "gulp" when reading the code. If the blob of code in the namespace is
-larger (as it typically is in a header in the llvm or clang namespaces), do not
-indent the code, and add a comment indicating what namespace is being closed.
-For example:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-namespace llvm {
-namespace knowledge {
-
-/// Grokable - This class represents things that Smith can have an intimate
-/// understanding of and contains the data associated with it.
-class Grokable {
-...
-public:
- explicit Grokable() { ... }
- virtual ~Grokable() = 0;
-
- ...
-
-};
-
-} // end namespace knowledge
-} // end namespace llvm
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>Because the class is large, we don't expect that the reader can easily
-understand the entire concept in a glance, and the end of the file (where the
-namespaces end) may be a long ways away from the place they open. As such,
-indenting the contents of the namespace doesn't add any value, and detracts from
-the readability of the class. In these cases it is best to <em>not</em> indent
-the contents of the namespace.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- _______________________________________________________________________ -->
-<div class="doc_subsubsection">
- <a name="micro_anonns">Anonymous Namespaces</a>
-</div>
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>After talking about namespaces in general, you may be wondering about
-anonymous namespaces in particular.
-Anonymous namespaces are a great language feature that tells the C++ compiler
-that the contents of the namespace are only visible within the current
-translation unit, allowing more aggressive optimization and eliminating the
-possibility of symbol name collisions. Anonymous namespaces are to C++ as
-"static" is to C functions and global variables. While "static" is available
-in C++, anonymous namespaces are more general: they can make entire classes
-private to a file.</p>
-
-<p>The problem with anonymous namespaces is that they naturally want to
-encourage indentation of their body, and they reduce locality of reference: if
-you see a random function definition in a C++ file, it is easy to see if it is
-marked static, but seeing if it is in an anonymous namespace requires scanning
-a big chunk of the file.</p>
-
-<p>Because of this, we have a simple guideline: make anonymous namespaces as
-small as possible, and only use them for class declarations. For example, this
-is good:</p>
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-<b>namespace {</b>
- class StringSort {
- ...
- public:
- StringSort(...)
- bool operator&lt;(const char *RHS) const;
- };
-<b>} // end anonymous namespace</b>
-
-static void Helper() {
- ...
-}
-
-bool StringSort::operator&lt;(const char *RHS) const {
- ...
-}
-
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-<p>This is bad:</p>
-
-
-<div class="doc_code">
-<pre>
-<b>namespace {</b>
-class StringSort {
-...
-public:
- StringSort(...)
- bool operator&lt;(const char *RHS) const;
-};
-
-void Helper() {
- ...
-}
-
-bool StringSort::operator&lt;(const char *RHS) const {
- ...
-}
-
-<b>} // end anonymous namespace</b>
-
-</pre>
-</div>
-
-
-<p>This is bad specifically because if you're looking at "Helper" in the middle
-of a large C++ file, that you have no immediate way to tell if it is local to
-the file. When it is marked static explicitly, this is immediately obvious.
-Also, there is no reason to enclose the definition of "operator&lt;" in the
-namespace just because it was declared there.
-</p>
-
-</div>
-
-
-
-<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-<div class="doc_section">
- <a name="seealso">See Also</a>
-</div>
-<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-
-<div class="doc_text">
-
-<p>A lot of these comments and recommendations have been culled for other
-sources. Two particularly important books for our work are:</p>
-
-<ol>
-
-<li><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Effective-Specific-Addison-Wesley-Professional-Computing/dp/0321334876">Effective
-C++</a> by Scott Meyers. Also
-interesting and useful are "More Effective C++" and "Effective STL" by the same
-author.</li>
-
-<li>Large-Scale C++ Software Design by John Lakos</li>
-
-</ol>
-
-<p>If you get some free time, and you haven't read them: do so, you might learn
-something.</p>
-
-</div>
-
-<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
-
-<hr>
-<address>
- <a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"><img
- src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss-blue" alt="Valid CSS"></a>
- <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
- src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401-blue" alt="Valid HTML 4.01"></a>
-
- <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a><br>
- <a href="http://llvm.org">LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br>
- Last modified: $Date$
-</address>
-
-</body>
-</html>