aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/HistoricalNotes/2000-12-06-EncodingIdea.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/HistoricalNotes/2000-12-06-EncodingIdea.txt')
-rw-r--r--docs/HistoricalNotes/2000-12-06-EncodingIdea.txt30
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/docs/HistoricalNotes/2000-12-06-EncodingIdea.txt b/docs/HistoricalNotes/2000-12-06-EncodingIdea.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 8c45292..0000000
--- a/docs/HistoricalNotes/2000-12-06-EncodingIdea.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-From: Chris Lattner [mailto:sabre@nondot.org]
-Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 6:41 PM
-To: Vikram S. Adve
-Subject: Additional idea with respect to encoding
-
-Here's another idea with respect to keeping the common case instruction
-size down (less than 32 bits ideally):
-
-Instead of encoding an instruction to operate on two register numbers,
-have it operate on two negative offsets based on the current register
-number. Therefore, instead of using:
-
-r57 = add r55, r56 (r57 is the implicit dest register, of course)
-
-We could use:
-
-r57 = add -2, -1
-
-My guess is that most SSA references are to recent values (especially if
-they correspond to expressions like (x+y*z+p*q/ ...), so the negative
-numbers would tend to stay small, even at the end of the procedure (where
-the implicit register destination number could be quite large). Of course
-the negative sign is reduntant, so you would be storing small integers
-almost all of the time, and 5-6 bits worth of register number would be
-plenty for most cases...
-
-What do you think?
-
--Chris
-