From 0e2b47592a5af00251b2478542374a0f428ae4ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Duff Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:53:33 -0700 Subject: Inline unknownFieldData{Equals,HashCode} to generated code. It turns out dex (apparently) was inlining these protected final methods from ExtendableMessageNano into every message class. Removing these methods from the base class and inlining their code reduces the method count by 2 methods / message when the store_unknown_fields option is on. Change-Id: I0aa09f2016d39939c4c8b8219601793b8fab301f --- src/google/protobuf/compiler/javanano/javanano_message.cc | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src') diff --git a/src/google/protobuf/compiler/javanano/javanano_message.cc b/src/google/protobuf/compiler/javanano/javanano_message.cc index dcfb870..4026031 100644 --- a/src/google/protobuf/compiler/javanano/javanano_message.cc +++ b/src/google/protobuf/compiler/javanano/javanano_message.cc @@ -552,7 +552,11 @@ void MessageGenerator::GenerateEquals(io::Printer* printer) { if (params_.store_unknown_fields()) { printer->Print( - "return unknownFieldDataEquals(other);\n"); + "if (unknownFieldData == null || unknownFieldData.isEmpty()) {\n" + " return other.unknownFieldData == null || other.unknownFieldData.isEmpty();\n" + "} else {\n" + " return unknownFieldData.equals(other.unknownFieldData);\n" + "}"); } else { printer->Print( "return true;\n"); @@ -582,7 +586,9 @@ void MessageGenerator::GenerateHashCode(io::Printer* printer) { if (params_.store_unknown_fields()) { printer->Print( - "result = 31 * result + unknownFieldDataHashCode();\n"); + "result = 31 * result + \n" + " (unknownFieldData == null || unknownFieldData.isEmpty() ? 0 : \n" + " unknownFieldData.hashCode());\n"); } printer->Print("return result;\n"); -- cgit v1.1