summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/WebKit/android/jni/CookieManager.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'WebKit/android/jni/CookieManager.cpp')
-rw-r--r--WebKit/android/jni/CookieManager.cpp44
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/WebKit/android/jni/CookieManager.cpp b/WebKit/android/jni/CookieManager.cpp
index e1e139e..154dc5d 100644
--- a/WebKit/android/jni/CookieManager.cpp
+++ b/WebKit/android/jni/CookieManager.cpp
@@ -27,16 +27,29 @@
#include "ChromiumIncludes.h"
#include "WebRequestContext.h"
+#include "WebCoreJni.h"
#include <JNIHelp.h>
using namespace base;
+using namespace net;
namespace android {
// JNI for android.webkit.CookieManager
static const char* javaCookieManagerClass = "android/webkit/CookieManager";
-static bool useChromiumHttpStack(JNIEnv*, jobject) {
+// Though WebRequestContext::get() is threadsafe, the context itself, in
+// general, is not. The context is generally used on the HTTP stack IO
+// thread, but calls to the methods of this class are made on the UI thread.
+// We ensure thread safety as follows ...
+// - The cookie_store() getter just returns a pointer which is only set when the
+// context is first constructed. The CookieMonster itself is threadsafe, so
+// using it from the UI thread is safe.
+// - Calls to the other WebRequestContext methods used here are explicitly
+// threadsafe.
+
+static bool useChromiumHttpStack(JNIEnv*, jobject)
+{
#if USE(CHROME_NETWORK_STACK)
return true;
#else
@@ -44,7 +57,8 @@ static bool useChromiumHttpStack(JNIEnv*, jobject) {
#endif
}
-static bool acceptCookie(JNIEnv*, jobject) {
+static bool acceptCookie(JNIEnv*, jobject)
+{
#if USE(CHROME_NETWORK_STACK)
// This is a static method which gets the cookie policy for all WebViews. We
// always apply the same configuration to the contexts for both regular and
@@ -59,14 +73,22 @@ static bool acceptCookie(JNIEnv*, jobject) {
#endif
}
-static void removeAllCookie(JNIEnv*, jobject) {
+static jstring getCookie(JNIEnv* env, jobject, jstring url)
+{
+#if USE(CHROME_NETWORK_STACK)
+ GURL gurl(jstringToStdString(env, url));
+ std::string cookies = WebRequestContext::get(false)->cookie_store()->GetCookieMonster()->GetCookiesWithOptions(gurl, CookieOptions());
+ return env->NewStringUTF(cookies.c_str());
+#else
+ // The Android HTTP stack is implemented Java-side.
+ ASSERT_NOT_REACHED();
+ return jstring();
+#endif
+}
+
+static void removeAllCookie(JNIEnv*, jobject)
+{
#if USE(CHROME_NETWORK_STACK)
- // Though WebRequestContext::get() is threadsafe, the context itself, in
- // general, is not. The context is generally used on the HTTP stack IO
- // thread, but this call is on the UI thread. However, the cookie_store()
- // getter just returns a pointer which is only set when the context is first
- // constructed. The CookieMonster is threadsafe, so the call below is safe
- // overall.
WebRequestContext::get(false)->cookie_store()->GetCookieMonster()->DeleteAllCreatedAfter(Time(), true);
// This will lazily create a new private browsing context. However, if the
// context doesn't already exist, there's no need to create it, as cookies
@@ -77,7 +99,8 @@ static void removeAllCookie(JNIEnv*, jobject) {
#endif
}
-static void setAcceptCookie(JNIEnv*, jobject, jboolean accept) {
+static void setAcceptCookie(JNIEnv*, jobject, jboolean accept)
+{
#if USE(CHROME_NETWORK_STACK)
// This is a static method which configures the cookie policy for all
// WebViews, so we configure the contexts for both regular and private
@@ -90,6 +113,7 @@ static void setAcceptCookie(JNIEnv*, jobject, jboolean accept) {
static JNINativeMethod gCookieManagerMethods[] = {
{ "nativeUseChromiumHttpStack", "()Z", (void*) useChromiumHttpStack },
{ "nativeAcceptCookie", "()Z", (void*) acceptCookie },
+ { "nativeGetCookie", "(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String;", (void*) getCookie },
{ "nativeRemoveAllCookie", "()V", (void*) removeAllCookie },
{ "nativeSetAcceptCookie", "(Z)V", (void*) setAcceptCookie },
};