| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This builds on the EGLImage solution. We simply use copybit to convert from the
YUV frame into an EGLImage created for that purpose and proceed with the
regular EGLImage code.
We need to do this because "regular" GL doesn't support YUV textures.
We could improve upon this by detecting exacly what the GL supports and bypass
this extra step if not required, but we'll do this later if needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
add a way to convert a mapped "pushbuffer" buffer to a gralloc handle
which then can be safely used by surfaceflinger, without including
gralloc_priv.h
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use EGLImageKHR instead of copybit directly.
We now have the basis to use streaming YUV textures (well, in fact
we already are). When/if we use the GPU instead of the MDP we'll
need to make sure it supports the appropriate YUV format.
Also make sure we compile if EGL_ANDROID_image_native_buffer is not supported
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When EGLImage extension is not available, SurfaceFlinger will fallback to using
glTexImage2D and glTexSubImage2D instead, which requires 50% more memory and an
extra copy. However this code path has never been exercised and had some bugs
which this patch fix.
Mainly the scale factor wasn't computed right when falling back on glDrawElements.
We also fallback to this mode of operation if a buffer doesn't have the adequate
usage bits for EGLImage usage.
This changes only code that is currently not executed. Some refactoring was needed to
keep the change clean. This doesn't change anything functionaly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
we ended-up locking a Mutex that had been destroyed.
This happened because we gave an sp<Source> to the outside world,
and were called after LayerBuffer had been destroyed.
Instead we now give a wp<LayerBuffer> to the outside and have it
do the destruction.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rewrote SurfaceFlinger's buffer management from the ground-up.
The design now support an arbitrary number of buffers per surface, however the current implementation is limited to four. Currently only 2 buffers are used in practice.
The main new feature is to be able to dequeue all buffers at once (very important when there are only two).
A client can dequeue all buffers until there are none available, it can lock all buffers except the last one that is used for composition. The client will block then, until a new buffer is enqueued.
The current implementation requires that buffers are locked in the same order they are dequeued and enqueued in the same order they are locked. Only one buffer can be locked at a time.
eg. Allowed sequence: DQ, DQ, LOCK, Q, LOCK, Q
eg. Forbidden sequence: DQ, DQ, LOCK, LOCK, Q, Q
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
be called at least once on each overlay, and it appears that sometimes this
doesn't happen because the visibility never changes. With this change
the overlay parameter and position will be committed when either the visibility
of the window changes, or on the first call to visibility resolved, if it
hasn't already been done.
Signed-off-by: Rebecca Schultz Zavin <rebecca@android.com>
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
video again
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
destroyed
|
|\ |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Surfaces are now destroyed once all references from the clients are gone, but they go through a partial destruction as soon as the window manager requests it.
This last part is still buggy. see comments in SurfaceFlinger::destroySurface()
|
|/
|
|
| |
SurfaceFlinger rework for new EGL driver model support.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|