aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/linux/slob_def.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* kmemtrace: SLOB hooks.Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu2008-12-291-4/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | This adds hooks for the SLOB allocator, to allow tracing with kmemtrace. We also convert some inline functions to __always_inline to make sure _RET_IP_, which expands to __builtin_return_address(0), always works as expected. Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
* slob: Kill off duplicate kzalloc() definition.Paul Mundt2007-07-171-10/+0
| | | | | | | | | | With the slab zeroing allocations cleanups Christoph stubbed in a generic kzalloc(), which was missed on SLOB. Follow the SLAB/SLUB changes and kill off the __kzalloc() wrapper that SLOB was using. Reported-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
* slob: initial NUMA supportPaul Mundt2007-07-161-0/+46
This adds preliminary NUMA support to SLOB, primarily aimed at systems with small nodes (tested all the way down to a 128kB SRAM block), whether asymmetric or otherwise. We follow the same conventions as SLAB/SLUB, preferring current node placement for new pages, or with explicit placement, if a node has been specified. Presently on UP NUMA this has the side-effect of preferring node#0 allocations (since numa_node_id() == 0, though this could be reworked if we could hand off a pfn to determine node placement), so single-CPU NUMA systems will want to place smaller nodes further out in terms of node id. Once a page has been bound to a node (via explicit node id typing), we only do block allocations from partial free pages that have a matching node id in the page flags. The current implementation does have some scalability problems, in that all partial free pages are tracked in the global freelist (with contention due to the single spinlock). However, these are things that are being reworked for SMP scalability first, while things like per-node freelists can easily be built on top of this sort of functionality once it's been added. More background can be found in: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118117916022379&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118170446306199&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=118187859420048&w=2 and subsequent threads. Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Acked-by: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>