From 053a7b5b7617a72d7c61b6f84196d1c0f79b9849 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Russell King <rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:22:25 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM SMP: __xchg support
This enables the existing __xchg implementation to be used on SMP.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
---
include/asm-arm/system.h | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
(limited to 'include/asm-arm')
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/system.h b/include/asm-arm/system.h
index 3d0d286..cdf49f4 100644
--- a/include/asm-arm/system.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm/system.h
@@ -290,7 +290,6 @@ do { \
})
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-#error SMP not supported
#define smp_mb() mb()
#define smp_rmb() rmb()
@@ -304,6 +303,8 @@ do { \
#define smp_wmb() barrier()
#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0)
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+
#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_SA1100) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_SA110)
/*
* On the StrongARM, "swp" is terminally broken since it bypasses the
@@ -316,9 +317,16 @@ do { \
*
* We choose (1) since its the "easiest" to achieve here and is not
* dependent on the processor type.
+ *
+ * NOTE that this solution won't work on an SMP system, so explcitly
+ * forbid it here.
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+#error SMP is not supported on SA1100/SA110
+#else
#define swp_is_buggy
#endif
+#endif
static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size)
{
@@ -361,8 +369,6 @@ static inline unsigned long __xchg(unsigned long x, volatile void *ptr, int size
return ret;
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
#define arch_align_stack(x) (x)
--
cgit v1.1