From 6f74651ae626ec672028587bc700538076dfbefb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baruch Even Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 23:36:42 -0800 Subject: [TCP]: Seperate DSACK from SACK fast path Move DSACK code outside the SACK fast-path checking code. If the DSACK determined that the information was too old we stayed with a partial cache copied. Most likely this matters very little since the next packet will not be DSACK and we will find it in the cache. but it's still not good form and there is little reason to couple the two checks. Since the SACK receive cache doesn't need the data to be in host order we also remove the ntohl in the checking loop. Signed-off-by: Baruch Even Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- include/linux/tcp.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'include/linux') diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h index 3cc70d1..29d3089 100644 --- a/include/linux/tcp.h +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ struct tcp_sock { struct tcp_sack_block duplicate_sack[1]; /* D-SACK block */ struct tcp_sack_block selective_acks[4]; /* The SACKS themselves*/ - struct tcp_sack_block recv_sack_cache[4]; + struct tcp_sack_block_wire recv_sack_cache[4]; /* from STCP, retrans queue hinting */ struct sk_buff* lost_skb_hint; -- cgit v1.1