From fc766e4c4965915ab52a1d1fa3c7a7b3e7bc07f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Dumazet Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 03:09:24 +0000 Subject: decnet: RCU conversion and get rid of dev_base_lock While tracking dev_base_lock users, I found decnet used it in dnet_select_source(), but for a wrong purpose: Writers only hold RTNL, not dev_base_lock, so readers must use RCU if they cannot use RTNL. Adds an rcu_head in struct dn_ifaddr and handle proper RCU management. Adds __rcu annotation in dn_route as well. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: Steven Whitehouse Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- include/net/dst.h | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'include/net/dst.h') diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h index ffe9cb7..a5bd726 100644 --- a/include/net/dst.h +++ b/include/net/dst.h @@ -94,10 +94,10 @@ struct dst_entry { int __use; unsigned long lastuse; union { - struct dst_entry *next; - struct rtable __rcu *rt_next; - struct rt6_info *rt6_next; - struct dn_route *dn_next; + struct dst_entry *next; + struct rtable __rcu *rt_next; + struct rt6_info *rt6_next; + struct dn_route __rcu *dn_next; }; }; -- cgit v1.1