From 60aa49243d09afc873f082567d2e3c16634ced84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:52:56 -0700 Subject: Rationalize fasync return values Most fasync implementations do something like: return fasync_helper(...); But fasync_helper() will return a positive value at times - a feature used in at least one place. Thus, a number of other drivers do: err = fasync_helper(...); if (err < 0) return err; return 0; In the interests of consistency and more concise code, it makes sense to map positive return values onto zero where ->fasync() is called. Cc: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet --- drivers/char/sonypi.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/char/sonypi.c') diff --git a/drivers/char/sonypi.c b/drivers/char/sonypi.c index f437443..fd3dced 100644 --- a/drivers/char/sonypi.c +++ b/drivers/char/sonypi.c @@ -888,12 +888,7 @@ found: static int sonypi_misc_fasync(int fd, struct file *filp, int on) { - int retval; - - retval = fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &sonypi_device.fifo_async); - if (retval < 0) - return retval; - return 0; + return fasync_helper(fd, filp, on, &sonypi_device.fifo_async); } static int sonypi_misc_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) -- cgit v1.1