| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I5e11b46b7c2f7f8760d6c0e713ca99c1e88b7cd3
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I0bf4cbe990c21b6d57e54e96ea62c56ca2d41b86
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug: 20664753
Change-Id: Iab232b1f172094919839d57f15644dfb2eaa1425
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I88ca3e6e70d1ff9db8f1328f18c36abc196e1aad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If there are packages that specify logtags being built that aren't
included in the product, their logtags won't be included in the merged
file. Assign an arbitrary tag number to them so they can be built
anyway.
Change-Id: I4929016bf289b7a814b48bc51f324c09f500fab1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With this change, you can specify "?" in place of a tag number in a
.logtags file and the build system will assign numbers to these tags.
(The numbers used shouldn't matter since we translate them back to tag
names whenever the logs are read back.)
This is pretty straightforward to do:
- make merge-event-log-tags.py assign numbers to any tags that specify
"?"
- make the generated java files depend on the merged output
- make java-event-log-tags.py read both the original .logtags and the
merged output, and fill in tag numbers for any "?" using the merged
version.
Change-Id: Icc6ccd705db461d570fc929922a830aa6deaca48
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: Iebca77f2f710ee4c15bf7089647f8d79fe79f33a
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Generate a javadoc @hide comment on the class when "option
javadoc_hide true" is specified in the input .logtags file.
|
|
Construct the /system/etc/event-log-tags file by unioning together any
*.logtags files included in LOCAL_SRC_FILES throughout the system (with
appropriate error checking for dup tag numbers, etc.)
For java packages, generate a java source file from the logtags file for
that package that contains static integer constants for each tag name.
|