aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>2008-05-26 05:18:34 +0000
committerBill Wendling <isanbard@gmail.com>2008-05-26 05:18:34 +0000
commit48f7f237ea5224c44e9c2782836fb7b60d8b5db1 (patch)
treed7cd0d8f2c3c13b53745d1e9361bcdb1610ca555
parent505242f9b628a4a9b2dc53346b6f1c43670f44a7 (diff)
downloadexternal_llvm-48f7f237ea5224c44e9c2782836fb7b60d8b5db1.zip
external_llvm-48f7f237ea5224c44e9c2782836fb7b60d8b5db1.tar.gz
external_llvm-48f7f237ea5224c44e9c2782836fb7b60d8b5db1.tar.bz2
A problem that's exposed when machine LICM is enabled. Consider this code:
LBB1_3: # bb ... xorl %ebp, %ebp subl (%ebx), %ebp ... incl %ecx cmpl %edi, %ecx jl LBB1_3 # bb Whe using machine LICM, LLVM converts it into: xorl %esi, %esi LBB1_3: # bb ... movl %esi, %ebp subl (%ebx), %ebp ... incl %ecx cmpl %edi, %ecx jl LBB1_3 # bb Two address conversion inserts the copy instruction. However, it's cheaper to rematerialize it, and remat helps reduce register pressure. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51562 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
-rw-r--r--lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp41
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
index 1e24914..84491a5 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/TwoAddressInstructionPass.cpp
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
using namespace llvm;
@@ -200,6 +201,8 @@ bool TwoAddressInstructionPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
DOUT << "********** REWRITING TWO-ADDR INSTRS **********\n";
DOUT << "********** Function: " << MF.getFunction()->getName() << '\n';
+ SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 8> ReMattedInstrs;
+
for (MachineFunction::iterator mbbi = MF.begin(), mbbe = MF.end();
mbbi != mbbe; ++mbbi) {
for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator mi = mbbi->begin(), me = mbbi->end();
@@ -321,7 +324,14 @@ bool TwoAddressInstructionPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
InstructionRearranged:
const TargetRegisterClass* rc = MF.getRegInfo().getRegClass(regA);
- TII->copyRegToReg(*mbbi, mi, regA, regB, rc, rc);
+ MachineInstr *Orig = MRI->getVRegDef(regB);
+
+ if (Orig && TII->isTriviallyReMaterializable(Orig)) {
+ TII->reMaterialize(*mbbi, mi, regA, Orig);
+ ReMattedInstrs.insert(Orig);
+ } else {
+ TII->copyRegToReg(*mbbi, mi, regA, regB, rc, rc);
+ }
MachineBasicBlock::iterator prevMi = prior(mi);
DOUT << "\t\tprepend:\t"; DEBUG(prevMi->print(*cerr.stream(), &TM));
@@ -357,5 +367,34 @@ bool TwoAddressInstructionPass::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
}
}
+ SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 8>::iterator I = ReMattedInstrs.begin();
+ SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 8>::iterator E = ReMattedInstrs.end();
+
+ for (; I != E; ++I) {
+ MachineInstr *MI = *I;
+ bool InstrDead = true;
+
+ for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
+ const MachineOperand &MO = MI->getOperand(i);
+ if (!MO.isRegister())
+ continue;
+ unsigned MOReg = MO.getReg();
+ if (!MOReg)
+ continue;
+ if (MO.isDef()) {
+ if (MO.isImplicit())
+ continue;
+
+ if (MRI->use_begin(MOReg) != MRI->use_end()) {
+ InstrDead = false;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (InstrDead && MI->getNumOperands() > 0)
+ MI->eraseFromParent();
+ }
+
return MadeChange;
}