Add boolean simplification support from CMOV

- If a boolean value is generated from CMOV and tested as boolean value,
  simplify the use of test result by referencing the original condition.
  RDRAND intrinisc is one of such cases.



git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@163516 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

2 files changed, 59 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
index 0ad74c9..b0dc5b7 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
@@ -14158,19 +14158,49 @@ static SDValue checkBoolTestSetCCCombine(SDValue Cmp, X86::CondCode &CC) {
   if (SetCC.getOpcode() == ISD::ZERO_EXTEND)
     SetCC = SetCC.getOperand(0);
 
-  // Quit if not SETCC.
-  // FIXME: So far we only handle the boolean value generated from SETCC. If
-  // there is other ways to generate boolean values, we need handle them here
-  // as well.
-  if (SetCC.getOpcode() != X86ISD::SETCC)
-    return SDValue();
-
-  // Set the condition code or opposite one if necessary.
-  CC = X86::CondCode(SetCC.getConstantOperandVal(0));
-  if (needOppositeCond)
-    CC = X86::GetOppositeBranchCondition(CC);
+  switch (SetCC.getOpcode()) {
+  case X86ISD::SETCC:
+    // Set the condition code or opposite one if necessary.
+    CC = X86::CondCode(SetCC.getConstantOperandVal(0));
+    if (needOppositeCond)
+      CC = X86::GetOppositeBranchCondition(CC);
+    return SetCC.getOperand(1);
+  case X86ISD::CMOV: {
+    // Check whether false/true value has canonical one, i.e. 0 or 1.
+    ConstantSDNode *FVal = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(SetCC.getOperand(0));
+    ConstantSDNode *TVal = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(SetCC.getOperand(1));
+    // Quit if true value is not a constant.
+    if (!TVal)
+      return SDValue();
+    // Quit if false value is not a constant.
+    if (!FVal) {
+      // A special case for rdrand, where 0 is set if false cond is found.
+      SDValue Op = SetCC.getOperand(0);
+      if (Op.getOpcode() != X86ISD::RDRAND)
+        return SDValue();
+    }
+    // Quit if false value is not the constant 0 or 1.
+    bool FValIsFalse = true;
+    if (FVal && FVal->getZExtValue() != 0) {
+      if (FVal->getZExtValue() != 1)
+        return SDValue();
+      // If FVal is 1, opposite cond is needed.
+      needOppositeCond = !needOppositeCond;
+      FValIsFalse = false;
+    }
+    // Quit if TVal is not the constant opposite of FVal.
+    if (FValIsFalse && TVal->getZExtValue() != 1)
+      return SDValue();
+    if (!FValIsFalse && TVal->getZExtValue() != 0)
+      return SDValue();
+    CC = X86::CondCode(SetCC.getConstantOperandVal(2));
+    if (needOppositeCond)
+      CC = X86::GetOppositeBranchCondition(CC);
+    return SetCC.getOperand(3);
+  }
+  }
 
-  return SetCC.getOperand(1);
+  return SDValue();
 }
 
 /// checkFlaggedOrCombine - DAG combination on X86ISD::OR, i.e. with EFLAGS
diff --git a/test/CodeGen/X86/bool-simplify.ll b/test/CodeGen/X86/bool-simplify.ll
index 0cb9fd9..09eb5d1 100644
--- a/test/CodeGen/X86/bool-simplify.ll
+++ b/test/CodeGen/X86/bool-simplify.ll
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: llc < %s -march=x86-64 -mattr=+sse41,-avx | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc < %s -march=x86-64 -mattr=+sse41,-avx,+rdrand | FileCheck %s
 
 define i32 @foo(<2 x i64> %c, i32 %a, i32 %b) {
   %t1 = call i32 @llvm.x86.sse41.ptestz(<2 x i64> %c, <2 x i64> %c)
@@ -39,4 +39,20 @@ define i32 @bax(<2 x i64> %c) {
 ; CHECK: ret
 }
 
+define i32 @rnd(i32 %arg) nounwind uwtable {
+  %1 = tail call { i32, i32 } @llvm.x86.rdrand.32() nounwind
+  %2 = extractvalue { i32, i32 } %1, 0
+  %3 = extractvalue { i32, i32 } %1, 1
+  %4 = icmp eq i32 %3, 0
+  %5 = select i1 %4, i32 0, i32 %arg
+  %6 = add i32 %5, %2
+  ret i32 %6
+; CHECK: rnd
+; CHECK: rdrand
+; CHECK: cmov
+; CHECK-NOT: cmov
+; CHECK: ret
+}
+
 declare i32 @llvm.x86.sse41.ptestz(<2 x i64>, <2 x i64>) nounwind readnone
+declare { i32, i32 } @llvm.x86.rdrand.32() nounwind