[PM] Completely remove support for explicit 'require' methods on the

AnalysisManager. All this method did was assert something and we have
a perfectly good way to trigger that assert from the query path.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194947 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

2 files changed, 6 insertions, 32 deletions

diff --git a/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h b/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h
index 08aac77..833547a 100644
--- a/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h
+++ b/include/llvm/IR/PassManager.h
@@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ public:
   /// constructed around.
   template <typename PassT>
   const typename PassT::Result &getResult(Module *M) {
+    assert(ModuleAnalysisPasses.count(PassT::ID()) &&
+           "This analysis pass was not registered prior to being queried");
+
     const AnalysisResultConcept<Module> &ResultConcept =
         getResultImpl(PassT::ID(), M);
     typedef AnalysisResultModel<Module, typename PassT::Result> ResultModelT;
@@ -163,6 +166,9 @@ public:
   /// re-run the analysis to produce a valid result.
   template <typename PassT>
   const typename PassT::Result &getResult(Function *F) {
+    assert(FunctionAnalysisPasses.count(PassT::ID()) &&
+           "This analysis pass was not registered prior to being queried");
+
     const AnalysisResultConcept<Function> &ResultConcept =
         getResultImpl(PassT::ID(), F);
     typedef AnalysisResultModel<Function, typename PassT::Result> ResultModelT;
@@ -180,21 +186,6 @@ public:
     registerAnalysisPassImpl<PassT>(llvm_move(Pass));
   }
 
-  /// \brief Require that a particular analysis pass is provided by the manager.
-  ///
-  /// This allows transform passes to assert ther requirements during
-  /// construction and fail fast if the analysis manager doesn't provide the
-  /// needed facilities.
-  ///
-  /// We force the analysis manager to have these passes explicitly registered
-  /// first to ensure that there is exactly one place in the code responsible
-  /// for adding an analysis pass to the manager as all transforms will share
-  /// a single pass within the manager and each may not be the canonical place
-  /// to initialize such a pass.
-  template <typename PassT> void requireAnalysisPass() {
-    requireAnalysisPassImpl<PassT>();
-  }
-
   /// \brief Invalidate a specific analysis pass for an IR module.
   ///
   /// Note that the analysis result can disregard invalidation.
@@ -334,22 +325,6 @@ private:
         new AnalysisPassModel<PassT>(llvm_move(Pass));
   }
 
-  /// \brief Module pass specific implementation of requirement declaration.
-  template <typename PassT>
-  typename enable_if<is_same<typename PassT::IRUnitT, Module> >::type
-  requireAnalysisPassImpl() {
-    assert(ModuleAnalysisPasses.count(PassT::ID()) &&
-           "This analysis pass was not registered prior to being required");
-  }
-
-  /// \brief Function pass specific implementation of requirement declaration.
-  template <typename PassT>
-  typename enable_if<is_same<typename PassT::IRUnitT, Function> >::type
-  requireAnalysisPassImpl() {
-    assert(FunctionAnalysisPasses.count(PassT::ID()) &&
-           "This analysis pass was not registered prior to being required");
-  }
-
 
   /// \brief Map type from module analysis pass ID to pass concept pointer.
   typedef DenseMap<void *, polymorphic_ptr<AnalysisPassConcept<Module> > >
diff --git a/unittests/IR/PassManagerTest.cpp b/unittests/IR/PassManagerTest.cpp
index 8eec0ec..7b60e38 100644
--- a/unittests/IR/PassManagerTest.cpp
+++ b/unittests/IR/PassManagerTest.cpp
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ struct TestModulePass {
 struct TestFunctionPass {
   TestFunctionPass(AnalysisManager &AM, int &RunCount, int &AnalyzedInstrCount)
       : AM(AM), RunCount(RunCount), AnalyzedInstrCount(AnalyzedInstrCount) {
-    AM.requireAnalysisPass<TestAnalysisPass>();
   }
 
   bool run(Function *F) {