aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs/HowToSubmitABug.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDan Gohman <djg@cray.com>2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000
committerDan Gohman <djg@cray.com>2007-07-18 16:29:46 +0000
commitf17a25c88b892d30c2b41ba7ecdfbdfb2b4be9cc (patch)
treeebb79ea1ee5e3bc1fdf38541a811a8b804f0679a /docs/HowToSubmitABug.html
downloadexternal_llvm-f17a25c88b892d30c2b41ba7ecdfbdfb2b4be9cc.zip
external_llvm-f17a25c88b892d30c2b41ba7ecdfbdfb2b4be9cc.tar.gz
external_llvm-f17a25c88b892d30c2b41ba7ecdfbdfb2b4be9cc.tar.bz2
It's not necessary to do rounding for alloca operations when the requested
alignment is equal to the stack alignment. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@40004 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/HowToSubmitABug.html')
-rw-r--r--docs/HowToSubmitABug.html355
1 files changed, 355 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/HowToSubmitABug.html b/docs/HowToSubmitABug.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..93e0d21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/HowToSubmitABug.html
@@ -0,0 +1,355 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
+<html>
+<head>
+ <title>How to submit an LLVM bug report</title>
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="llvm.css" type="text/css">
+</head>
+<body>
+
+<div class="doc_title">
+ How to submit an LLVM bug report
+</div>
+
+<table class="layout" style="width: 90%" >
+<tr class="layout">
+ <td class="left">
+<ol>
+ <li><a href="#introduction">Introduction - Got bugs?</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#crashers">Crashing Bugs</a>
+ <ul>
+ <li><a href="#front-end">Front-end bugs</a>
+ <li><a href="#ct_optimizer">Compile-time optimization bugs</a>
+ <li><a href="#ct_codegen">Code generator bugs</a>
+ </ul></li>
+ <li><a href="#miscompilations">Miscompilations</a></li>
+ <li><a href="#codegen">Incorrect code generation (JIT and LLC)</a></li>
+</ol>
+<div class="doc_author">
+ <p>Written by <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a> and
+ <a href="http://misha.brukman.net">Misha Brukman</a></p>
+</div>
+</td>
+<td class="right">
+ <img src="img/Debugging.gif" alt="Debugging" width="444" height="314">
+</td>
+</tr>
+</table>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<div class="doc_section">
+ <a name="introduction">Introduction - Got bugs?</a>
+</div>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>If you're working with LLVM and run into a bug, we definitely want to know
+about it. This document describes what you can do to increase the odds of
+getting it fixed quickly.</p>
+
+<p>Basically you have to do two things at a minimum. First, decide whether the
+bug <a href="#crashers">crashes the compiler</a> (or an LLVM pass), or if the
+compiler is <a href="#miscompilations">miscompiling</a> the program (i.e., the
+compiler successfully produces an executable, but it doesn't run right). Based
+on
+what type of bug it is, follow the instructions in the linked section to narrow
+down the bug so that the person who fixes it will be able to find the problem
+more easily.</p>
+
+<p>Once you have a reduced test-case, go to <a
+href="http://llvm.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi">the LLVM Bug Tracking
+System</a> and fill out the form with the necessary details (note that you don't
+need to pick a catagory, just use the "new-bugs" catagory if you're not sure).
+The bug description should contain the following
+information:</p>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>All information necessary to reproduce the problem.</li>
+ <li>The reduced test-case that triggers the bug.</li>
+ <li>The location where you obtained LLVM (if not from our Subversion
+ repository).</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>Thanks for helping us make LLVM better!</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<div class="doc_section">
+ <a name="crashers">Crashing Bugs</a>
+</div>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>More often than not, bugs in the compiler cause it to crash&mdash;often due
+to an assertion failure of some sort. The most important
+piece of the puzzle is to figure out if it is crashing in the GCC front-end
+or if it is one of the LLVM libraries (e.g. the optimizer or code generator)
+that has problems.</p>
+
+<p>To figure out which component is crashing (the front-end,
+optimizer or code generator), run the
+<tt><b>llvm-gcc</b></tt> command line as you were when the crash occurred, but
+with the following extra command line options:</p>
+
+<ul>
+ <li><tt><b>-O0 -emit-llvm</b></tt>: If <tt>llvm-gcc</tt> still crashes when
+ passed these options (which disable the optimizer and code generator), then
+ the crash is in the front-end. Jump ahead to the section on <a
+ href="#front-end">front-end bugs</a>.</li>
+
+ <li><tt><b>-emit-llvm</b></tt>: If <tt>llvm-gcc</tt> crashes with this option
+ (which disables the code generator), you found an optimizer bug. Jump ahead
+ to <a href="#ct_optimizer"> compile-time optimization bugs</a>.</li>
+
+ <li>Otherwise, you have a code generator crash. Jump ahead to <a
+ href="#ct_codegen">code generator bugs</a>.</li>
+
+</ul>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="front-end">Front-end bugs</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>If the problem is in the front-end, you should re-run the same
+<tt>llvm-gcc</tt> command that resulted in the crash, but add the
+<tt>-save-temps</tt> option. The compiler will crash again, but it will leave
+behind a <tt><i>foo</i>.i</tt> file (containing preprocessed C source code) and
+possibly <tt><i>foo</i>.s</tt> for each
+compiled <tt><i>foo</i>.c</tt> file. Send us the <tt><i>foo</i>.i</tt> file,
+along with the options you passed to llvm-gcc, and a brief description of the
+error it caused.</p>
+
+<p>The <a href="http://delta.tigris.org/">delta</a> tool helps to reduce the
+preprocessed file down to the smallest amount of code that still replicates the
+problem. You're encouraged to use delta to reduce the code to make the
+developers' lives easier. <a
+href="http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction">This website</a>
+has instructions on the best way to use delta.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="ct_optimizer">Compile-time optimization bugs</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>If you find that a bug crashes in the optimizer, compile your test-case to a
+<tt>.bc</tt> file by passing "<tt><b>-emit-llvm -O0 -c -o foo.bc</b></tt>".
+Then run:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<p><tt><b>opt</b> -std-compile-opts -debug-pass=Arguments foo.bc
+ -disable-output</tt></p>
+</div>
+
+<p>This command should do two things: it should print out a list of passes, and
+then it should crash in the same was as llvm-gcc. If it doesn't crash, please
+follow the instructions for a <a href="#front-end">front-end bug</a>.</p>
+
+<p>If this does crash, then you should be able to debug this with the following
+bugpoint command:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<p><tt><b>bugpoint</b> foo.bc &lt;list of passes printed by
+<b>opt</b>&gt;</tt></p>
+</div>
+
+<p>Please run this, then file a bug with the instructions and reduced .bc files
+that bugpoint emits. If something goes wrong with bugpoint, please submit the
+"foo.bc" file and the list of passes printed by <b>opt</b>.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- ======================================================================= -->
+<div class="doc_subsection">
+ <a name="ct_codegen">Code generator bugs</a>
+</div>
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>If you find a bug that crashes llvm-gcc in the code generator, compile your
+source file to a .bc file by passing "<tt><b>-emit-llvm -c -o foo.bc</b></tt>"
+to llvm-gcc (in addition to the options you already pass). Once your have
+foo.bc, one of the following commands should fail:</p>
+
+<ol>
+<li><tt><b>llc</b> foo.bc -f</tt></li>
+<li><tt><b>llc</b> foo.bc -f -relocation-model=pic</tt></li>
+<li><tt><b>llc</b> foo.bc -f -relocation-model=static</tt></li>
+<li><tt><b>llc</b> foo.bc -f -enable-eh</tt></li>
+<li><tt><b>llc</b> foo.bc -f -relocation-model=pic -enable-eh</tt></li>
+<li><tt><b>llc</b> foo.bc -f -relocation-model=static -enable-eh</tt></li>
+</ol>
+
+<p>If none of these crash, please follow the instructions for a
+<a href="#front-end">front-end bug</a>. If one of these do crash, you should
+be able to reduce this with one of the following bugpoint command lines (use
+the one corresponding to the command above that failed):</p>
+
+<ol>
+<li><tt><b>bugpoint</b> -run-llc foo.bc</tt></li>
+<li><tt><b>bugpoint</b> -run-llc foo.bc --tool-args
+ -relocation-model=pic</tt></li>
+<li><tt><b>bugpoint</b> -run-llc foo.bc --tool-args
+ -relocation-model=static</tt></li>
+<li><tt><b>bugpoint</b> -run-llc foo.bc --tool-args -enable-eh</tt></li>
+<li><tt><b>bugpoint</b> -run-llc foo.bc --tool-args
+ -relocation-model=pic -enable-eh</tt></li>
+<li><tt><b>bugpoint</b> -run-llc foo.bc --tool-args
+ -relocation-model=static -enable-eh</tt></li>
+</ol>
+
+<p>Please run this, then file a bug with the instructions and reduced .bc file
+that bugpoint emits. If something goes wrong with bugpoint, please submit the
+"foo.bc" file and the option that llc crashes with.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<div class="doc_section">
+ <a name="miscompilations">Miscompilations</a>
+</div>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>If llvm-gcc successfully produces an executable, but that executable doesn't
+run right, this is either a bug in the code or a bug in the
+compiler. The first thing to check is to make sure it is not using undefined
+behavior (e.g. reading a variable before it is defined). In particular, check
+to see if the program <a href="http://valgrind.org/">valgrind</a>s clean,
+passes purify, or some other memory checker tool. Many of the "LLVM bugs" that
+we have chased down ended up being bugs in the program being compiled, not
+ LLVM.</p>
+
+<p>Once you determine that the program itself is not buggy, you should choose
+which code generator you wish to compile the program with (e.g. C backend, the
+JIT, or LLC) and optionally a series of LLVM passes to run. For example:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<p><tt>
+<b>bugpoint</b> -run-cbe [... optzn passes ...] file-to-test.bc --args -- [program arguments]</tt></p>
+</div>
+
+<p><tt>bugpoint</tt> will try to narrow down your list of passes to the one pass
+that causes an error, and simplify the bitcode file as much as it can to assist
+you. It will print a message letting you know how to reproduce the resulting
+error.</p>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<div class="doc_section">
+ <a name="codegen">Incorrect code generation</a>
+</div>
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+
+<div class="doc_text">
+
+<p>Similarly to debugging incorrect compilation by mis-behaving passes, you can
+debug incorrect code generation by either LLC or the JIT, using
+<tt>bugpoint</tt>. The process <tt>bugpoint</tt> follows in this case is to try
+to narrow the code down to a function that is miscompiled by one or the other
+method, but since for correctness, the entire program must be run,
+<tt>bugpoint</tt> will compile the code it deems to not be affected with the C
+Backend, and then link in the shared object it generates.</p>
+
+<p>To debug the JIT:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+bugpoint -run-jit -output=[correct output file] [bitcode file] \
+ --tool-args -- [arguments to pass to lli] \
+ --args -- [program arguments]
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p>Similarly, to debug the LLC, one would run:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<pre>
+bugpoint -run-llc -output=[correct output file] [bitcode file] \
+ --tool-args -- [arguments to pass to llc] \
+ --args -- [program arguments]
+</pre>
+</div>
+
+<p><b>Special note:</b> if you are debugging MultiSource or SPEC tests that
+already exist in the <tt>llvm/test</tt> hierarchy, there is an easier way to
+debug the JIT, LLC, and CBE, using the pre-written Makefile targets, which
+will pass the program options specified in the Makefiles:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<p><tt>
+cd llvm/test/../../program<br>
+make bugpoint-jit
+</tt></p>
+</div>
+
+<p>At the end of a successful <tt>bugpoint</tt> run, you will be presented
+with two bitcode files: a <em>safe</em> file which can be compiled with the C
+backend and the <em>test</em> file which either LLC or the JIT
+mis-codegenerates, and thus causes the error.</p>
+
+<p>To reproduce the error that <tt>bugpoint</tt> found, it is sufficient to do
+the following:</p>
+
+<ol>
+
+<li><p>Regenerate the shared object from the safe bitcode file:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<p><tt>
+<b>llc</b> -march=c safe.bc -o safe.c<br>
+<b>gcc</b> -shared safe.c -o safe.so
+</tt></p>
+</div></li>
+
+<li><p>If debugging LLC, compile test bitcode native and link with the shared
+ object:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<p><tt>
+<b>llc</b> test.bc -o test.s -f<br>
+<b>gcc</b> test.s safe.so -o test.llc<br>
+./test.llc [program options]
+</tt></p>
+</div></li>
+
+<li><p>If debugging the JIT, load the shared object and supply the test
+ bitcode:</p>
+
+<div class="doc_code">
+<p><tt><b>lli</b> -load=safe.so test.bc [program options]</tt></p>
+</div></li>
+
+</ol>
+
+</div>
+
+<!-- *********************************************************************** -->
+<hr>
+<address>
+ <a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/check/referer"><img
+ src="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/images/vcss" alt="Valid CSS!"></a>
+ <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
+ src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401" alt="Valid HTML 4.01!" /></a>
+
+ <a href="mailto:sabre@nondot.org">Chris Lattner</a><br>
+ <a href="http://llvm.org">The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a>
+ <br>
+ Last modified: $Date$
+</address>
+
+</body>
+</html>