diff options
author | Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr> | 2011-10-28 19:01:20 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr> | 2011-10-28 19:01:20 +0000 |
commit | 012f8547f70c7cefe552282f28581a434ebe7324 (patch) | |
tree | a5bd039d949ceecf225351d88d4b3ba0f54fc72f /lib/Analysis | |
parent | 2ec69faf2615ccdffffacff9033b2228c589971c (diff) | |
download | external_llvm-012f8547f70c7cefe552282f28581a434ebe7324.zip external_llvm-012f8547f70c7cefe552282f28581a434ebe7324.tar.gz external_llvm-012f8547f70c7cefe552282f28581a434ebe7324.tar.bz2 |
The expression icmp eq (select (icmp eq x, 0), 1, x), 0 folds to false.
Spotted by my super-optimizer in 186.crafty and 450.soplex. We really
need a proper infrastructure for handling generalizations of this kind
of thing (which occur a lot), however this case is so simple that I decided
to go ahead and implement it directly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@143214 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Analysis')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp | 74 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp b/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp index 6bef0ae..83881de 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp @@ -416,39 +416,55 @@ static Value *ThreadCmpOverSelect(CmpInst::Predicate Pred, Value *LHS, } assert(isa<SelectInst>(LHS) && "Not comparing with a select instruction!"); SelectInst *SI = cast<SelectInst>(LHS); + Value *Cond = SI->getCondition(); + Value *TV = SI->getTrueValue(); + Value *FV = SI->getFalseValue(); // Now that we have "cmp select(Cond, TV, FV), RHS", analyse it. // Does "cmp TV, RHS" simplify? - if (Value *TCmp = SimplifyCmpInst(Pred, SI->getTrueValue(), RHS, TD, DT, - MaxRecurse)) { - // It does! Does "cmp FV, RHS" simplify? - if (Value *FCmp = SimplifyCmpInst(Pred, SI->getFalseValue(), RHS, TD, DT, - MaxRecurse)) { - // It does! If they simplified to the same value, then use it as the - // result of the original comparison. - if (TCmp == FCmp) - return TCmp; - Value *Cond = SI->getCondition(); - // If the false value simplified to false, then the result of the compare - // is equal to "Cond && TCmp". This also catches the case when the false - // value simplified to false and the true value to true, returning "Cond". - if (match(FCmp, m_Zero())) - if (Value *V = SimplifyAndInst(Cond, TCmp, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) - return V; - // If the true value simplified to true, then the result of the compare - // is equal to "Cond || FCmp". - if (match(TCmp, m_One())) - if (Value *V = SimplifyOrInst(Cond, FCmp, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) - return V; - // Finally, if the false value simplified to true and the true value to - // false, then the result of the compare is equal to "!Cond". - if (match(FCmp, m_One()) && match(TCmp, m_Zero())) - if (Value *V = - SimplifyXorInst(Cond, Constant::getAllOnesValue(Cond->getType()), - TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) - return V; - } + Value *TCmp = SimplifyCmpInst(Pred, TV, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse); + if (!TCmp) { + // It didn't simplify. However if "cmp TV, RHS" is equal to the select + // condition itself then we can replace it with 'true'. + if (match(Cond, m_ICmp(Pred, m_Specific(TV), m_Specific(RHS)))) + TCmp = getTrue(Cond->getType()); + } + if (!TCmp) + return 0; + + // Does "cmp FV, RHS" simplify? + Value *FCmp = SimplifyCmpInst(Pred, FV, RHS, TD, DT, MaxRecurse); + if (!FCmp) { + // It didn't simplify. However if "cmp FV, RHS" is equal to the select + // condition itself then we can replace it with 'false'. + if (match(Cond, m_ICmp(Pred, m_Specific(FV), m_Specific(RHS)))) + FCmp = getFalse(Cond->getType()); } + if (!FCmp) + return 0; + + // If both sides simplified to the same value, then use it as the result of + // the original comparison. + if (TCmp == FCmp) + return TCmp; + // If the false value simplified to false, then the result of the compare + // is equal to "Cond && TCmp". This also catches the case when the false + // value simplified to false and the true value to true, returning "Cond". + if (match(FCmp, m_Zero())) + if (Value *V = SimplifyAndInst(Cond, TCmp, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) + return V; + // If the true value simplified to true, then the result of the compare + // is equal to "Cond || FCmp". + if (match(TCmp, m_One())) + if (Value *V = SimplifyOrInst(Cond, FCmp, TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) + return V; + // Finally, if the false value simplified to true and the true value to + // false, then the result of the compare is equal to "!Cond". + if (match(FCmp, m_One()) && match(TCmp, m_Zero())) + if (Value *V = + SimplifyXorInst(Cond, Constant::getAllOnesValue(Cond->getType()), + TD, DT, MaxRecurse)) + return V; return 0; } |