diff options
author | Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr> | 2009-01-01 15:52:00 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr> | 2009-01-01 15:52:00 +0000 |
commit | 4a36127089bb2f78811d3f5a43c76b3d6f24f213 (patch) | |
tree | 1898f427b35c6795171701138e08762cd3aff3c1 /lib/CodeGen | |
parent | 268d2da796169d5ad9ea513cd16d34b5f292fabe (diff) | |
download | external_llvm-4a36127089bb2f78811d3f5a43c76b3d6f24f213.zip external_llvm-4a36127089bb2f78811d3f5a43c76b3d6f24f213.tar.gz external_llvm-4a36127089bb2f78811d3f5a43c76b3d6f24f213.tar.bz2 |
Fix PR3274: when promoting the condition of a BRCOND node,
promote from i1 all the way up to the canonical SetCC type.
In order to discover an appropriate type to use, pass
MVT::Other to getSetCCResultType. In order to be able to
do this, change getSetCCResultType to take a type as an
argument, not a value (this is also more logical).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@61542 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/CodeGen')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp | 15 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp | 107 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeFloatTypes.cpp | 16 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp | 83 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuild.cpp | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp | 2 |
7 files changed, 130 insertions, 103 deletions
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp index bc3117c..4fb50e3 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp @@ -2799,7 +2799,8 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSELECT_CC(SDNode *N) { return N2; // Determine if the condition we're dealing with is constant - SDValue SCC = SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(N0), N0, N1, CC, false); + SDValue SCC = SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(N0.getValueType()), + N0, N1, CC, false); if (SCC.getNode()) AddToWorkList(SCC.getNode()); if (ConstantSDNode *SCCC = dyn_cast_or_null<ConstantSDNode>(SCC.getNode())) { @@ -4242,7 +4243,7 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitBR_CC(SDNode *N) { SDValue CondLHS = N->getOperand(2), CondRHS = N->getOperand(3); // Use SimplifySetCC to simplify SETCC's. - SDValue Simp = SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(CondLHS), + SDValue Simp = SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(CondLHS.getValueType()), CondLHS, CondRHS, CC->get(), false); if (Simp.getNode()) AddToWorkList(Simp.getNode()); @@ -5437,7 +5438,8 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::SimplifySelectCC(SDValue N0, SDValue N1, ConstantSDNode *N3C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(N3.getNode()); // Determine if the condition we're dealing with is constant - SDValue SCC = SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(N0), N0, N1, CC, false); + SDValue SCC = SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(N0.getValueType()), + N0, N1, CC, false); if (SCC.getNode()) AddToWorkList(SCC.getNode()); ConstantSDNode *SCCC = dyn_cast_or_null<ConstantSDNode>(SCC.getNode()); @@ -5517,7 +5519,8 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::SimplifySelectCC(SDValue N0, SDValue N1, SDValue Temp, SCC; // cast from setcc result type to select result type if (LegalTypes) { - SCC = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(N0), N0, N1, CC); + SCC = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(N0.getValueType()), + N0, N1, CC); if (N2.getValueType().bitsLT(SCC.getValueType())) Temp = DAG.getZeroExtendInReg(SCC, N2.getValueType()); else @@ -5543,8 +5546,8 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::SimplifySelectCC(SDValue N0, SDValue N1, if (0 && N3C && N3C->isNullValue() && N2C && (N2C->getAPIntValue() == 1ULL)) { MVT XType = N0.getValueType(); if (!LegalOperations || - TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(N0))) { - SDValue Res = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(N0), N0, N1, CC); + TLI.isOperationLegal(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(XType))) { + SDValue Res = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(XType), N0, N1, CC); if (Res.getValueType() != VT) Res = DAG.getNode(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND, VT, Res); return Res; diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp index 2c0d9dd..97b526f 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeDAG.cpp @@ -2092,7 +2092,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDValue Op) { Tmp3 = Node->getOperand(3); // RHS Tmp4 = Node->getOperand(1); // CC - LegalizeSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp2), Tmp2, Tmp3, Tmp4); + LegalizeSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp2.getValueType()), Tmp2, Tmp3,Tmp4); LastCALLSEQ_END = DAG.getEntryNode(); // If we didn't get both a LHS and RHS back from LegalizeSetCC, @@ -2994,7 +2994,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDValue Op) { Tmp4 = LegalizeOp(Node->getOperand(3)); // False SDValue CC = Node->getOperand(4); - LegalizeSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1), Tmp1, Tmp2, CC); + LegalizeSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1.getValueType()), Tmp1, Tmp2, CC); // If we didn't get both a LHS and RHS back from LegalizeSetCC, // the LHS is a legal SETCC itself. In this case, we need to compare @@ -3109,7 +3109,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDValue Op) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumElems; ++i) { SDValue In1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, TmpEltVT, Tmp1, DAG.getIntPtrConstant(i)); - Ops[i] = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(In1), In1, + Ops[i] = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(TmpEltVT), In1, DAG.getNode(ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, TmpEltVT, Tmp2, DAG.getIntPtrConstant(i)), CC); @@ -3371,7 +3371,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDValue Op) { MVT IVT = Tmp2.getValueType() == MVT::f32 ? MVT::i32 : MVT::i64; SDValue SignBit = DAG.getNode(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, IVT, Tmp2); - SignBit = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(SignBit), + SignBit = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(IVT), SignBit, DAG.getConstant(0, IVT), ISD::SETLT); // Get the absolute value of the result. SDValue AbsVal = DAG.getNode(ISD::FABS, Tmp1.getValueType(), Tmp1); @@ -3736,7 +3736,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDValue Op) { break; case ISD::CTTZ: //if Tmp1 == sizeinbits(NVT) then Tmp1 = sizeinbits(Old VT) - Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1), Tmp1, + Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1.getValueType()), Tmp1, DAG.getConstant(NVT.getSizeInBits(), NVT), ISD::SETEQ); Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, NVT, Tmp2, @@ -3798,8 +3798,8 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDValue Op) { // Expand Y = FABS(X) -> Y = (X >u 0.0) ? X : fneg(X). MVT VT = Node->getValueType(0); Tmp2 = DAG.getConstantFP(0.0, VT); - Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1), Tmp1, Tmp2, - ISD::SETUGT); + Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1.getValueType()), + Tmp1, Tmp2, ISD::SETUGT); Tmp3 = DAG.getNode(ISD::FNEG, VT, Tmp1); Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, VT, Tmp2, Tmp1, Tmp3); break; @@ -4069,8 +4069,8 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeOp(SDValue Op) { APInt x = APInt::getSignBit(NVT.getSizeInBits()); (void)apf.convertFromAPInt(x, false, APFloat::rmNearestTiesToEven); Tmp2 = DAG.getConstantFP(apf, VT); - Tmp3 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Node->getOperand(0)), - Node->getOperand(0), Tmp2, ISD::SETLT); + Tmp3 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(VT), Node->getOperand(0), + Tmp2, ISD::SETLT); True = DAG.getNode(ISD::FP_TO_SINT, NVT, Node->getOperand(0)); False = DAG.getNode(ISD::FP_TO_SINT, NVT, DAG.getNode(ISD::FSUB, VT, Node->getOperand(0), @@ -4484,15 +4484,15 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::PromoteOp(SDValue Op) { assert(isa<ConstantFPSDNode>(Result) && "Didn't constant fold fp_extend?"); break; - case ISD::SETCC: - assert(isTypeLegal(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Node->getOperand(0))) + case ISD::SETCC: { + MVT VT0 = Node->getOperand(0).getValueType(); + assert(isTypeLegal(TLI.getSetCCResultType(VT0)) && "SetCC type is not legal??"); - Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, - TLI.getSetCCResultType(Node->getOperand(0)), + Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(VT0), Node->getOperand(0), Node->getOperand(1), Node->getOperand(2)); break; - + } case ISD::TRUNCATE: switch (getTypeAction(Node->getOperand(0).getValueType())) { case Legal: @@ -4898,7 +4898,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::PromoteOp(SDValue Op) { break; case ISD::CTTZ: // if Tmp1 == sizeinbits(NVT) then Tmp1 = sizeinbits(Old VT) - Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1), Tmp1, + Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1.getValueType()), Tmp1, DAG.getConstant(NVT.getSizeInBits(), NVT), ISD::SETEQ); Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, NVT, Tmp2, @@ -5167,12 +5167,14 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCOperands(SDValue &LHS, Tmp2 = DAG.getConstant(0, MVT::i32); CC = DAG.getCondCode(TLI.getCmpLibcallCC(LC1)); if (LC2 != RTLIB::UNKNOWN_LIBCALL) { - Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1), Tmp1, Tmp2, - CC); + Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, + TLI.getSetCCResultType(Tmp1.getValueType()), + Tmp1, Tmp2, CC); LHS = ExpandLibCall(LC2, DAG.getMergeValues(Ops, 2).getNode(), false /*sign irrelevant*/, Dummy); - Tmp2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHS), LHS, Tmp2, - DAG.getCondCode(TLI.getCmpLibcallCC(LC2))); + Tmp2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, + TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHS.getValueType()), LHS, + Tmp2, DAG.getCondCode(TLI.getCmpLibcallCC(LC2))); Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::OR, Tmp1.getValueType(), Tmp1, Tmp2); Tmp2 = SDValue(); } @@ -5192,13 +5194,15 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCOperands(SDValue &LHS, // BNE crN, L: // FCMPU crN, lo1, lo2 // The following can be improved, but not that much. - Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, - ISD::SETOEQ); - Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo), LHSLo, RHSLo, CCCode); + Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETOEQ); + Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo.getValueType()), + LHSLo, RHSLo, CCCode); Tmp3 = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, Tmp1.getValueType(), Tmp1, Tmp2); - Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, - ISD::SETUNE); - Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, CCCode); + Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETUNE); + Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, CCCode); Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, Tmp1.getValueType(), Tmp1, Tmp2); Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::OR, Tmp1.getValueType(), Tmp1, Tmp3); Tmp2 = SDValue(); @@ -5256,15 +5260,17 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCOperands(SDValue &LHS, // NOTE: on targets without efficient SELECT of bools, we can always use // this identity: (B1 ? B2 : B3) --> (B1 & B2)|(!B1&B3) TargetLowering::DAGCombinerInfo DagCombineInfo(DAG, false, true, NULL); - Tmp1 = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo), LHSLo, RHSLo, - LowCC, false, DagCombineInfo); + Tmp1 = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo.getValueType()), + LHSLo, RHSLo, LowCC, false, DagCombineInfo); if (!Tmp1.getNode()) - Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo), LHSLo, RHSLo, LowCC); - Tmp2 = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, - CCCode, false, DagCombineInfo); + Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo.getValueType()), + LHSLo, RHSLo, LowCC); + Tmp2 = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, CCCode, false, DagCombineInfo); if (!Tmp2.getNode()) - Tmp2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, - RHSHi,CC); + Tmp2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, + TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi,CC); ConstantSDNode *Tmp1C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Tmp1.getNode()); ConstantSDNode *Tmp2C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Tmp2.getNode()); @@ -5281,11 +5287,12 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::LegalizeSetCCOperands(SDValue &LHS, Tmp1 = Tmp2; Tmp2 = SDValue(); } else { - Result = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, - ISD::SETEQ, false, DagCombineInfo); + Result = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETEQ, false, + DagCombineInfo); if (!Result.getNode()) - Result=DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, - ISD::SETEQ); + Result=DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETEQ); Result = LegalizeOp(DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, Tmp1.getValueType(), Result, Tmp1, Tmp2)); Tmp1 = Result; @@ -5909,9 +5916,9 @@ ExpandIntToFP(bool isSigned, MVT DestTy, SDValue Source) { // signed, then adjust the result if the sign bit is set. SDValue SignedConv = ExpandIntToFP(true, DestTy, Source); - SDValue SignSet = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Hi), Hi, - DAG.getConstant(0, Hi.getValueType()), - ISD::SETLT); + SDValue SignSet = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Hi.getValueType()), + Hi, DAG.getConstant(0, Hi.getValueType()), + ISD::SETLT); SDValue Zero = DAG.getIntPtrConstant(0), Four = DAG.getIntPtrConstant(4); SDValue CstOffset = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, Zero.getValueType(), SignSet, Four, Zero); @@ -6050,9 +6057,9 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandLegalINT_TO_FP(bool isSigned, assert(!isSigned && "Legalize cannot Expand SINT_TO_FP for i64 yet"); SDValue Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SINT_TO_FP, DestVT, Op0); - SDValue SignSet = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Op0), Op0, - DAG.getConstant(0, Op0.getValueType()), - ISD::SETLT); + SDValue SignSet = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Op0.getValueType()), + Op0, DAG.getConstant(0, Op0.getValueType()), + ISD::SETLT); SDValue Zero = DAG.getIntPtrConstant(0), Four = DAG.getIntPtrConstant(4); SDValue CstOffset = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, Zero.getValueType(), SignSet, Four, Zero); @@ -6458,8 +6465,8 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandOp(SDValue Op, SDValue &Lo, SDValue &Hi){ ExpandOp(Node->getOperand(0), Lo, Hi); SDValue BitsC = DAG.getConstant(NVT.getSizeInBits(), NVT); SDValue HLZ = DAG.getNode(ISD::CTLZ, NVT, Hi); - SDValue TopNotZero = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(HLZ), HLZ, BitsC, - ISD::SETNE); + SDValue TopNotZero = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(NVT), HLZ, BitsC, + ISD::SETNE); SDValue LowPart = DAG.getNode(ISD::CTLZ, NVT, Lo); LowPart = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, NVT, LowPart, BitsC); @@ -6473,8 +6480,8 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandOp(SDValue Op, SDValue &Lo, SDValue &Hi){ ExpandOp(Node->getOperand(0), Lo, Hi); SDValue BitsC = DAG.getConstant(NVT.getSizeInBits(), NVT); SDValue LTZ = DAG.getNode(ISD::CTTZ, NVT, Lo); - SDValue BotNotZero = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LTZ), LTZ, BitsC, - ISD::SETNE); + SDValue BotNotZero = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(NVT), LTZ, BitsC, + ISD::SETNE); SDValue HiPart = DAG.getNode(ISD::CTTZ, NVT, Hi); HiPart = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, NVT, HiPart, BitsC); @@ -6950,12 +6957,12 @@ void SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandOp(SDValue Op, SDValue &Lo, SDValue &Hi){ if (Node->getOpcode() == ISD::ADD) { Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, NVT, LoOps, 2); Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, NVT, HiOps, 2); - SDValue Cmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Lo), + SDValue Cmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(NVT), Lo, LoOps[0], ISD::SETULT); SDValue Carry1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, NVT, Cmp1, DAG.getConstant(1, NVT), DAG.getConstant(0, NVT)); - SDValue Cmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Lo), + SDValue Cmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(NVT), Lo, LoOps[1], ISD::SETULT); SDValue Carry2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, NVT, Cmp2, DAG.getConstant(1, NVT), @@ -7875,8 +7882,8 @@ SDValue SelectionDAGLegalize::ScalarizeVectorOp(SDValue Op) { case ISD::VSETCC: { SDValue Op0 = ScalarizeVectorOp(Op.getOperand(0)); SDValue Op1 = ScalarizeVectorOp(Op.getOperand(1)); - Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(Op0), Op0, Op1, - Op.getOperand(2)); + Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(Op0.getValueType()), + Op0, Op1, Op.getOperand(2)); Result = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, NewVT, Result, DAG.getConstant(-1ULL, NewVT), DAG.getConstant(0ULL, NewVT)); diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeFloatTypes.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeFloatTypes.cpp index 9a766e2..3cfaa27 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeFloatTypes.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeFloatTypes.cpp @@ -594,10 +594,10 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::SoftenSetCCOperands(SDValue &NewLHS, SDValue &NewRHS, NewRHS = DAG.getConstant(0, RetVT); CCCode = TLI.getCmpLibcallCC(LC1); if (LC2 != RTLIB::UNKNOWN_LIBCALL) { - SDValue Tmp = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(NewLHS), + SDValue Tmp = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(RetVT), NewLHS, NewRHS, DAG.getCondCode(CCCode)); NewLHS = MakeLibCall(LC2, RetVT, Ops, 2, false/*sign irrelevant*/); - NewLHS = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(NewLHS), NewLHS, + NewLHS = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(RetVT), NewLHS, NewRHS, DAG.getCondCode(TLI.getCmpLibcallCC(LC2))); NewLHS = DAG.getNode(ISD::OR, Tmp.getValueType(), Tmp, NewLHS); NewRHS = SDValue(); @@ -1216,11 +1216,15 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::FloatExpandSetCCOperands(SDValue &NewLHS, // FCMPU crN, lo1, lo2 // The following can be improved, but not that much. SDValue Tmp1, Tmp2, Tmp3; - Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETOEQ); - Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo), LHSLo, RHSLo, CCCode); + Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETOEQ); + Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo.getValueType()), + LHSLo, RHSLo, CCCode); Tmp3 = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, Tmp1.getValueType(), Tmp1, Tmp2); - Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETUNE); - Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, CCCode); + Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETUNE); + Tmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, CCCode); Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, Tmp1.getValueType(), Tmp1, Tmp2); NewLHS = DAG.getNode(ISD::OR, Tmp1.getValueType(), Tmp1, Tmp3); NewRHS = SDValue(); // LHS is the result, not a compare. diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp index 7ae53eb..caa92b5 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeIntegerTypes.cpp @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_SELECT_CC(SDNode *N) { } SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_SETCC(SDNode *N) { - MVT SVT = TLI.getSetCCResultType(N->getOperand(0)); + MVT SVT = TLI.getSetCCResultType(N->getOperand(0).getValueType()); assert(isTypeLegal(SVT) && "Illegal SetCC type!"); // Get the SETCC result using the canonical SETCC type. @@ -728,25 +728,42 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_BRCOND(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) { assert(OpNo == 1 && "only know how to promote condition"); SDValue Cond = GetPromotedInteger(N->getOperand(1)); // Promote condition. - // Make sure the extra bits coming from type promotion conform to - // getBooleanContents. + // Promote all the way up to SVT, the canonical SetCC type. + MVT SVT = TLI.getSetCCResultType(MVT::Other); + assert(isTypeLegal(SVT) && "Illegal SetCC type!"); + assert(Cond.getValueType().bitsLE(SVT) && "Unexpected SetCC type!"); + + // Make sure the extra bits conform to getBooleanContents. There are + // two sets of extra bits: those in Cond, which come from type promotion, + // and those we need to add to have the final type be SVT (for most targets + // this last set of bits is empty). unsigned CondBits = Cond.getValueSizeInBits(); + ISD::NodeType ExtendCode; switch (TLI.getBooleanContents()) { default: assert(false && "Unknown BooleanContent!"); case TargetLowering::UndefinedBooleanContent: - // The promoted value, which may contain rubbish in the upper bits, is fine. + // Extend to SVT by adding rubbish. + ExtendCode = ISD::ANY_EXTEND; break; case TargetLowering::ZeroOrOneBooleanContent: + ExtendCode = ISD::ZERO_EXTEND; if (!DAG.MaskedValueIsZero(Cond,APInt::getHighBitsSet(CondBits,CondBits-1))) - Cond = DAG.getZeroExtendInReg(Cond, MVT::i1); + // All extra bits need to be cleared. Do this by zero extending the + // original condition value all the way to SVT. + Cond = N->getOperand(1); break; - case TargetLowering::ZeroOrNegativeOneBooleanContent: - if (DAG.ComputeNumSignBits(Cond) != CondBits) - Cond = DAG.getNode(ISD::SIGN_EXTEND_INREG, Cond.getValueType(), Cond, - DAG.getValueType(MVT::i1)); + case TargetLowering::ZeroOrNegativeOneBooleanContent: { + ExtendCode = ISD::SIGN_EXTEND; + unsigned SignBits = DAG.ComputeNumSignBits(Cond); + if (SignBits != CondBits) + // All extra bits need to be sign extended. Do this by sign extending the + // original condition value all the way to SVT. + Cond = N->getOperand(1); break; } + } + Cond = DAG.getNode(ExtendCode, SVT, Cond); // The chain (Op#0) and basic block destination (Op#2) are always legal types. return DAG.UpdateNodeOperands(SDValue(N, 0), N->getOperand(0), Cond, @@ -851,13 +868,7 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntOp_SELECT(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) { SDValue Cond = GetPromotedInteger(N->getOperand(0)); // Promote all the way up to SVT, the canonical SetCC type. - // FIXME: Not clear what value to pass to getSetCCResultType. - // [This only matters for CellSPU since all other targets - // ignore the argument.] We used to pass Cond, resulting in - // SVT = MVT::i8, but CellSPU has no select patterns for i8, - // causing an abort later. Passing the result type works - // around the problem. - MVT SVT = TLI.getSetCCResultType(N->getOperand(1)); + MVT SVT = TLI.getSetCCResultType(N->getOperand(1).getValueType()); assert(isTypeLegal(SVT) && "Illegal SetCC type!"); assert(Cond.getValueType().bitsLE(SVT) && "Unexpected SetCC type!"); @@ -1244,12 +1255,12 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_ADDSUB(SDNode *N, if (N->getOpcode() == ISD::ADD) { Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, NVT, LoOps, 2); Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, NVT, HiOps, 2); - SDValue Cmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Lo), Lo, LoOps[0], + SDValue Cmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(NVT), Lo, LoOps[0], ISD::SETULT); SDValue Carry1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, NVT, Cmp1, DAG.getConstant(1, NVT), DAG.getConstant(0, NVT)); - SDValue Cmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Lo), Lo, LoOps[1], + SDValue Cmp2 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(NVT), Lo, LoOps[1], ISD::SETULT); SDValue Carry2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, NVT, Cmp2, DAG.getConstant(1, NVT), Carry1); @@ -1257,8 +1268,9 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_ADDSUB(SDNode *N, } else { Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, NVT, LoOps, 2); Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::SUB, NVT, HiOps, 2); - SDValue Cmp = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LoOps[0]), - LoOps[0], LoOps[1], ISD::SETULT); + SDValue Cmp = + DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LoOps[0].getValueType()), + LoOps[0], LoOps[1], ISD::SETULT); SDValue Borrow = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, NVT, Cmp, DAG.getConstant(1, NVT), DAG.getConstant(0, NVT)); @@ -1391,7 +1403,7 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_CTLZ(SDNode *N, GetExpandedInteger(N->getOperand(0), Lo, Hi); MVT NVT = Lo.getValueType(); - SDValue HiNotZero = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Hi), Hi, + SDValue HiNotZero = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(NVT), Hi, DAG.getConstant(0, NVT), ISD::SETNE); SDValue LoLZ = DAG.getNode(ISD::CTLZ, NVT, Lo); @@ -1419,7 +1431,7 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntRes_CTTZ(SDNode *N, GetExpandedInteger(N->getOperand(0), Lo, Hi); MVT NVT = Lo.getValueType(); - SDValue LoNotZero = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Lo), Lo, + SDValue LoNotZero = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(NVT), Lo, DAG.getConstant(0, NVT), ISD::SETNE); SDValue LoLZ = DAG.getNode(ISD::CTTZ, NVT, Lo); @@ -2007,15 +2019,16 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::IntegerExpandSetCCOperands(SDValue &NewLHS, // this identity: (B1 ? B2 : B3) --> (B1 & B2)|(!B1&B3) TargetLowering::DAGCombinerInfo DagCombineInfo(DAG, false, true, NULL); SDValue Tmp1, Tmp2; - Tmp1 = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo), LHSLo, RHSLo, LowCC, - false, DagCombineInfo); + Tmp1 = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo.getValueType()), + LHSLo, RHSLo, LowCC, false, DagCombineInfo); if (!Tmp1.getNode()) - Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo), LHSLo, RHSLo, LowCC); - Tmp2 = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, - CCCode, false, DagCombineInfo); + Tmp1 = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSLo.getValueType()), + LHSLo, RHSLo, LowCC); + Tmp2 = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, CCCode, false, DagCombineInfo); if (!Tmp2.getNode()) - Tmp2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, - DAG.getCondCode(CCCode)); + Tmp2 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, DAG.getCondCode(CCCode)); ConstantSDNode *Tmp1C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Tmp1.getNode()); ConstantSDNode *Tmp2C = dyn_cast<ConstantSDNode>(Tmp2.getNode()); @@ -2034,11 +2047,11 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::IntegerExpandSetCCOperands(SDValue &NewLHS, return; } - NewLHS = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, - ISD::SETEQ, false, DagCombineInfo); + NewLHS = TLI.SimplifySetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETEQ, false, DagCombineInfo); if (!NewLHS.getNode()) - NewLHS = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi), LHSHi, RHSHi, - ISD::SETEQ); + NewLHS = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHSHi.getValueType()), + LHSHi, RHSHi, ISD::SETEQ); NewLHS = DAG.getNode(ISD::SELECT, Tmp1.getValueType(), NewLHS, Tmp1, Tmp2); NewRHS = SDValue(); @@ -2223,8 +2236,8 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntOp_UINT_TO_FP(SDNode *N) { // Check whether the sign bit is set. SDValue Lo, Hi; GetExpandedInteger(Op, Lo, Hi); - SDValue SignSet = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Hi), Hi, - DAG.getConstant(0, Hi.getValueType()), + SDValue SignSet = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(Hi.getValueType()), + Hi, DAG.getConstant(0, Hi.getValueType()), ISD::SETLT); // Build a 64 bit pair (0, FF) in the constant pool, with FF in the lo bits. diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp index 5c34db4..39b5179 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ SDValue DAGTypeLegalizer::ScalarizeVecRes_VSETCC(SDNode *N) { SDValue LHS = GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(0)); SDValue RHS = GetScalarizedVector(N->getOperand(1)); MVT NVT = N->getValueType(0).getVectorElementType(); - MVT SVT = TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHS); + MVT SVT = TLI.getSetCCResultType(LHS.getValueType()); // Turn it into a scalar SETCC. SDValue Res = DAG.getNode(ISD::SETCC, SVT, LHS, RHS, N->getOperand(2)); diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuild.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuild.cpp index a321bed..3daa79e 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuild.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuild.cpp @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ void SelectionDAGLowering::visitJumpTableHeader(JumpTable &JT, // Emit the range check for the jump table, and branch to the default block // for the switch statement if the value being switched on exceeds the largest // case in the switch. - SDValue CMP = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(SUB), SUB, + SDValue CMP = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(SUB.getValueType()), SUB, DAG.getConstant(JTH.Last-JTH.First,VT), ISD::SETUGT); @@ -1402,7 +1402,7 @@ void SelectionDAGLowering::visitBitTestHeader(BitTestBlock &B) { DAG.getConstant(B.First, VT)); // Check range - SDValue RangeCmp = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(SUB), SUB, + SDValue RangeCmp = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(SUB.getValueType()), SUB, DAG.getConstant(B.Range, VT), ISD::SETUGT); @@ -1455,8 +1455,8 @@ void SelectionDAGLowering::visitBitTestCase(MachineBasicBlock* NextMBB, SDValue AndOp = DAG.getNode(ISD::AND, TLI.getPointerTy(), SwitchVal, DAG.getConstant(B.Mask, TLI.getPointerTy())); - SDValue AndCmp = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(AndOp), AndOp, - DAG.getConstant(0, TLI.getPointerTy()), + SDValue AndCmp = DAG.getSetCC(TLI.getSetCCResultType(AndOp.getValueType()), + AndOp, DAG.getConstant(0, TLI.getPointerTy()), ISD::SETNE); CurMBB->addSuccessor(B.TargetBB); diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp index f2800bf..6fcecc8 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ const char *TargetLowering::getTargetNodeName(unsigned Opcode) const { } -MVT TargetLowering::getSetCCResultType(const SDValue &) const { +MVT TargetLowering::getSetCCResultType(MVT VT) const { return getValueType(TD->getIntPtrType()); } |