Unify CALLSEQ_{START,END}. They take 4 parameters: the chain, two stack

adjustment fields, and an optional flag. If there is a "dynamic_stackalloc" in
the code, make sure that it's bracketed by CALLSEQ_START and CALLSEQ_END. If
not, then there is the potential for the stack to be changed while the stack's
being used by another instruction (like a call).

This can only result in tears...


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@44037 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
index fd25502..d1cd8c0 100644
--- a/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/ARM/ARMISelLowering.cpp
@@ -605,10 +605,10 @@ SDOperand ARMTargetLowering::LowerCALL(SDOperand Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
   Chain = DAG.getNode(CallOpc, NodeTys, &Ops[0], Ops.size());
   InFlag = Chain.getValue(1);
 
-  SDOperand CSOps[] = { Chain, DAG.getConstant(NumBytes, MVT::i32), InFlag };
-  Chain = DAG.getNode(ISD::CALLSEQ_END, 
-                      DAG.getNodeValueTypes(MVT::Other, MVT::Flag),
-                      ((RetVT != MVT::Other) ? 2 : 1), CSOps, 3);
+  Chain = DAG.getCALLSEQ_END(Chain,
+                             DAG.getConstant(NumBytes, MVT::i32),
+                             DAG.getConstant(0, MVT::i32),
+                             InFlag);
   if (RetVT != MVT::Other)
     InFlag = Chain.getValue(1);