diff options
author | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2002-04-18 15:13:15 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org> | 2002-04-18 15:13:15 +0000 |
commit | 2a632551a77851e9810d007ba07738f8f6babeab (patch) | |
tree | b154a98cea931d40c3e2ce9d893417fc022926ab /lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp | |
parent | d59b0af98b8da068f345299a3fc68e151b46fbd7 (diff) | |
download | external_llvm-2a632551a77851e9810d007ba07738f8f6babeab.zip external_llvm-2a632551a77851e9810d007ba07738f8f6babeab.tar.gz external_llvm-2a632551a77851e9810d007ba07738f8f6babeab.tar.bz2 |
Convert SCCP over to use InstVisitor instead of hand crafted switch
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@2286 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp | 317 |
1 files changed, 136 insertions, 181 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp index e7e8f41..fd3daa5 100644 --- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp +++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include "llvm/iTerminators.h" #include "llvm/iOther.h" #include "llvm/Pass.h" +#include "llvm/Support/InstVisitor.h" #include "Support/STLExtras.h" #include <algorithm> #include <map> @@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ public: // This class does all of the work of Sparse Conditional Constant Propogation. // It's public interface consists of a constructor and a doSCCP() method. // -class SCCP { +class SCCP : public InstVisitor<SCCP> { Function *M; // The function that we are working on std::set<BasicBlock*> BBExecutable;// The basic blocks that are executable @@ -109,6 +110,7 @@ public: // The implementation of this class // private: + friend class InstVisitor<SCCP>; // Allow callbacks from visitor // markValueOverdefined - Make a value be marked as "constant". If the value // is not already a constant, add it to the instruction work list so that @@ -168,11 +170,34 @@ private: } - // UpdateInstruction - Something changed in this instruction... Either an + // visit implementations - Something changed in this instruction... Either an // operand made a transition, or the instruction is newly executable. Change // the value type of I to reflect these changes if appropriate. // - void UpdateInstruction(Instruction *I); + void visitPHINode(PHINode *I); + + // Terminators + void visitReturnInst(ReturnInst *I) { /*does not have an effect*/ } + void visitBranchInst(BranchInst *I); + void visitSwitchInst(SwitchInst *I); + + void visitUnaryOperator(Instruction *I); + void visitCastInst(CastInst *I) { visitUnaryOperator(I); } + void visitBinaryOperator(Instruction *I); + void visitShiftInst(ShiftInst *I) { visitBinaryOperator(I); } + + // Instructions that cannot be folded away... + void visitMemAccessInst (Instruction *I) { markOverdefined(I); } + void visitCallInst (Instruction *I) { markOverdefined(I); } + void visitInvokeInst (Instruction *I) { markOverdefined(I); } + void visitAllocationInst(Instruction *I) { markOverdefined(I); } + void visitFreeInst (Instruction *I) { markOverdefined(I); } + + void visitInstruction(Instruction *I) { + // If a new instruction is added to LLVM that we don't handle... + cerr << "SCCP: Don't know how to handle: " << I; + markOverdefined(I); // Just in case + } // OperandChangedState - This method is invoked on all of the users of an // instruction that was just changed state somehow.... Based on this @@ -225,10 +250,9 @@ bool SCCP::doSCCP() { if (BB->getTerminator()->getNumSuccessors() == 1) markExecutable(BB->getTerminator()->getSuccessor(0)); - // Loop over all of the instructions and notify them that they are newly - // executable... - for_each(BB->begin(), BB->end(), - bind_obj(this, &SCCP::UpdateInstruction)); + // Notify all instructions in this basic block that they are newly + // executable. + visit(BB); } } @@ -284,7 +308,7 @@ bool SCCP::doSCCP() { } -// UpdateInstruction - Something changed in this instruction... Either an +// visit Implementations - Something changed in this instruction... Either an // operand made a transition, or the instruction is newly executable. Change // the value type of I to reflect these changes if appropriate. This method // makes sure to do the following actions: @@ -302,199 +326,130 @@ bool SCCP::doSCCP() { // 7. If a conditional branch has a value that is overdefined, make all // successors executable. // -void SCCP::UpdateInstruction(Instruction *I) { - InstVal &IValue = ValueState[I]; - if (IValue.isOverdefined()) - return; // If already overdefined, we aren't going to effect anything - - switch (I->getOpcode()) { - //===-----------------------------------------------------------------===// - // Handle PHI nodes... - // - case Instruction::PHINode: { - PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode>(I); - unsigned NumValues = PN->getNumIncomingValues(), i; - InstVal *OperandIV = 0; - - // Look at all of the executable operands of the PHI node. If any of them - // are overdefined, the PHI becomes overdefined as well. If they are all - // constant, and they agree with each other, the PHI becomes the identical - // constant. If they are constant and don't agree, the PHI is overdefined. - // If there are no executable operands, the PHI remains undefined. - // - for (i = 0; i < NumValues; ++i) { - if (BBExecutable.count(PN->getIncomingBlock(i))) { - InstVal &IV = getValueState(PN->getIncomingValue(i)); - if (IV.isUndefined()) continue; // Doesn't influence PHI node. - if (IV.isOverdefined()) { // PHI node becomes overdefined! - markOverdefined(PN); - return; - } - if (OperandIV == 0) { // Grab the first value... - OperandIV = &IV; - } else { // Another value is being merged in! - // There is already a reachable operand. If we conflict with it, - // then the PHI node becomes overdefined. If we agree with it, we - // can continue on. - - // Check to see if there are two different constants merging... - if (IV.getConstant() != OperandIV->getConstant()) { - // Yes there is. This means the PHI node is not constant. - // You must be overdefined poor PHI. - // - markOverdefined(I); // The PHI node now becomes overdefined - return; // I'm done analyzing you - } +void SCCP::visitPHINode(PHINode *PN) { + unsigned NumValues = PN->getNumIncomingValues(), i; + InstVal *OperandIV = 0; + + // Look at all of the executable operands of the PHI node. If any of them + // are overdefined, the PHI becomes overdefined as well. If they are all + // constant, and they agree with each other, the PHI becomes the identical + // constant. If they are constant and don't agree, the PHI is overdefined. + // If there are no executable operands, the PHI remains undefined. + // + for (i = 0; i < NumValues; ++i) { + if (BBExecutable.count(PN->getIncomingBlock(i))) { + InstVal &IV = getValueState(PN->getIncomingValue(i)); + if (IV.isUndefined()) continue; // Doesn't influence PHI node. + if (IV.isOverdefined()) { // PHI node becomes overdefined! + markOverdefined(PN); + return; + } + + if (OperandIV == 0) { // Grab the first value... + OperandIV = &IV; + } else { // Another value is being merged in! + // There is already a reachable operand. If we conflict with it, + // then the PHI node becomes overdefined. If we agree with it, we + // can continue on. + + // Check to see if there are two different constants merging... + if (IV.getConstant() != OperandIV->getConstant()) { + // Yes there is. This means the PHI node is not constant. + // You must be overdefined poor PHI. + // + markOverdefined(PN); // The PHI node now becomes overdefined + return; // I'm done analyzing you } } } + } - // If we exited the loop, this means that the PHI node only has constant - // arguments that agree with each other(and OperandIV is a pointer to one - // of their InstVal's) or OperandIV is null because there are no defined - // incoming arguments. If this is the case, the PHI remains undefined. - // - if (OperandIV) { - assert(OperandIV->isConstant() && "Should only be here for constants!"); - markConstant(I, OperandIV->getConstant()); // Aquire operand value - } - return; + // If we exited the loop, this means that the PHI node only has constant + // arguments that agree with each other(and OperandIV is a pointer to one + // of their InstVal's) or OperandIV is null because there are no defined + // incoming arguments. If this is the case, the PHI remains undefined. + // + if (OperandIV) { + assert(OperandIV->isConstant() && "Should only be here for constants!"); + markConstant(PN, OperandIV->getConstant()); // Aquire operand value } +} - //===-----------------------------------------------------------------===// - // Handle instructions that unconditionally provide overdefined values... - // - case Instruction::Malloc: - case Instruction::Free: - case Instruction::Alloca: - case Instruction::Load: - case Instruction::Store: - // TODO: getfield - case Instruction::Call: - case Instruction::Invoke: - markOverdefined(I); // Memory and call's are all overdefined - return; - - //===-----------------------------------------------------------------===// - // Handle Terminator instructions... - // - case Instruction::Ret: return; // Function return doesn't affect anything - case Instruction::Br: { // Handle conditional branches... - BranchInst *BI = cast<BranchInst>(I); - if (BI->isUnconditional()) - return; // Unconditional branches are already handled! - - InstVal &BCValue = getValueState(BI->getCondition()); - if (BCValue.isOverdefined()) { - // Overdefined condition variables mean the branch could go either way. +void SCCP::visitBranchInst(BranchInst *BI) { + if (BI->isUnconditional()) + return; // Unconditional branches are already handled! + + InstVal &BCValue = getValueState(BI->getCondition()); + if (BCValue.isOverdefined()) { + // Overdefined condition variables mean the branch could go either way. + markExecutable(BI->getSuccessor(0)); + markExecutable(BI->getSuccessor(1)); + } else if (BCValue.isConstant()) { + // Constant condition variables mean the branch can only go a single way. + if (BCValue.getConstant() == ConstantBool::True) markExecutable(BI->getSuccessor(0)); + else markExecutable(BI->getSuccessor(1)); - } else if (BCValue.isConstant()) { - // Constant condition variables mean the branch can only go a single way. - ConstantBool *CPB = cast<ConstantBool>(BCValue.getConstant()); - if (CPB->getValue()) // If the branch condition is TRUE... - markExecutable(BI->getSuccessor(0)); - else // Else if the br cond is FALSE... - markExecutable(BI->getSuccessor(1)); - } - return; } +} - case Instruction::Switch: { - SwitchInst *SI = cast<SwitchInst>(I); - InstVal &SCValue = getValueState(SI->getCondition()); - if (SCValue.isOverdefined()) { // Overdefined condition? All dests are exe - for(unsigned i = 0; BasicBlock *Succ = SI->getSuccessor(i); ++i) - markExecutable(Succ); - } else if (SCValue.isConstant()) { - Constant *CPV = SCValue.getConstant(); - // Make sure to skip the "default value" which isn't a value - for (unsigned i = 1, E = SI->getNumSuccessors(); i != E; ++i) { - if (SI->getSuccessorValue(i) == CPV) {// Found the right branch... - markExecutable(SI->getSuccessor(i)); - return; - } +void SCCP::visitSwitchInst(SwitchInst *SI) { + InstVal &SCValue = getValueState(SI->getCondition()); + if (SCValue.isOverdefined()) { // Overdefined condition? All dests are exe + for(unsigned i = 0; BasicBlock *Succ = SI->getSuccessor(i); ++i) + markExecutable(Succ); + } else if (SCValue.isConstant()) { + Constant *CPV = SCValue.getConstant(); + // Make sure to skip the "default value" which isn't a value + for (unsigned i = 1, E = SI->getNumSuccessors(); i != E; ++i) { + if (SI->getSuccessorValue(i) == CPV) {// Found the right branch... + markExecutable(SI->getSuccessor(i)); + return; } - - // Constant value not equal to any of the branches... must execute - // default branch then... - markExecutable(SI->getDefaultDest()); } - return; - } - - default: break; // Handle math operators as groups. - } // end switch(I->getOpcode()) - - //===-------------------------------------------------------------------===// - // Handle Unary and cast instructions... - // - if (isa<UnaryOperator>(I) || isa<CastInst>(I)) { - Value *V = I->getOperand(0); - InstVal &VState = getValueState(V); - if (VState.isOverdefined()) { // Inherit overdefinedness of operand - markOverdefined(I); - } else if (VState.isConstant()) { // Propogate constant value - Constant *Result = isa<CastInst>(I) - ? ConstantFoldCastInstruction(VState.getConstant(), I->getType()) - : ConstantFoldUnaryInstruction(I->getOpcode(), VState.getConstant()); - - if (Result) { - // This instruction constant folds! - markConstant(I, Result); - } else { - markOverdefined(I); // Don't know how to fold this instruction. :( - } - } - return; + // Constant value not equal to any of the branches... must execute + // default branch then... + markExecutable(SI->getDefaultDest()); } +} - - //===-----------------------------------------------------------------===// - // Handle GetElementPtr instructions... - // - if (isa<GetElementPtrInst>(I)) { +void SCCP::visitUnaryOperator(Instruction *I) { + Value *V = I->getOperand(0); + InstVal &VState = getValueState(V); + if (VState.isOverdefined()) { // Inherit overdefinedness of operand markOverdefined(I); - return; - } - - - //===-----------------------------------------------------------------===// - // Handle Binary instructions... - // - if (isa<BinaryOperator>(I) || isa<ShiftInst>(I)) { - Value *V1 = I->getOperand(0); - Value *V2 = I->getOperand(1); - - InstVal &V1State = getValueState(V1); - InstVal &V2State = getValueState(V2); - if (V1State.isOverdefined() || V2State.isOverdefined()) { - markOverdefined(I); - } else if (V1State.isConstant() && V2State.isConstant()) { - Constant *Result = - ConstantFoldBinaryInstruction(I->getOpcode(), - V1State.getConstant(), - V2State.getConstant()); - if (Result) { - // This instruction constant folds! - markConstant(I, Result); - } else { - markOverdefined(I); // Don't know how to fold this instruction. :( - } + } else if (VState.isConstant()) { // Propogate constant value + Constant *Result = isa<CastInst>(I) + ? ConstantFoldCastInstruction(VState.getConstant(), I->getType()) + : ConstantFoldUnaryInstruction(I->getOpcode(), VState.getConstant()); + + if (Result) { + // This instruction constant folds! + markConstant(I, Result); + } else { + markOverdefined(I); // Don't know how to fold this instruction. :( } - return; } - - // Shouldn't get here... either the switch statement or one of the group - // handlers should have kicked in... - // - cerr << "SCCP: Don't know how to handle: " << I; - markOverdefined(I); // Just in case } - +// Handle BinaryOperators and Shift Instructions... +void SCCP::visitBinaryOperator(Instruction *I) { + InstVal &V1State = getValueState(I->getOperand(0)); + InstVal &V2State = getValueState(I->getOperand(1)); + if (V1State.isOverdefined() || V2State.isOverdefined()) { + markOverdefined(I); + } else if (V1State.isConstant() && V2State.isConstant()) { + Constant *Result = ConstantFoldBinaryInstruction(I->getOpcode(), + V1State.getConstant(), + V2State.getConstant()); + if (Result) + markConstant(I, Result); // This instruction constant fold!s + else + markOverdefined(I); // Don't know how to fold this instruction. :( + } +} // OperandChangedState - This method is invoked on all of the users of an // instruction that was just changed state somehow.... Based on this @@ -505,7 +460,7 @@ void SCCP::OperandChangedState(User *U) { Instruction *I = cast<Instruction>(U); if (!BBExecutable.count(I->getParent())) return; // Inst not executable yet! - UpdateInstruction(I); + visit(I); } namespace { |