aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/VMCore
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>2002-01-31 00:42:27 +0000
committerChris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>2002-01-31 00:42:27 +0000
commit93193f806378e06092820c099e437886c7309b94 (patch)
treebbdfa045f4638bb044937aeaaeab19611f65d534 /lib/VMCore
parent0f0fc3253dd44b5b6d617812d37591fa26a28599 (diff)
downloadexternal_llvm-93193f806378e06092820c099e437886c7309b94.zip
external_llvm-93193f806378e06092820c099e437886c7309b94.tar.gz
external_llvm-93193f806378e06092820c099e437886c7309b94.tar.bz2
Convert analyses to new pass structure
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@1603 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/VMCore')
-rw-r--r--lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp89
-rw-r--r--lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp2
2 files changed, 58 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp b/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp
index 2e4f6e4..f3e6613 100644
--- a/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp
+++ b/lib/VMCore/Dominators.cpp
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
-#include "llvm/Analysis/SimplifyCFG.h" // To get cfg::UnifyAllExitNodes
+#include "llvm/Transforms/UnifyMethodExitNodes.h"
#include "llvm/Method.h"
#include "Support/DepthFirstIterator.h"
#include "Support/STLExtras.h"
@@ -31,31 +31,28 @@ void set_intersect(set<Ty> &S1, const set<Ty2> &S2) {
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// DominatorBase Implementation
+// DominatorSet Implementation
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-bool cfg::DominatorBase::isPostDominator() const {
- // Root can be null if there is no exit node from the CFG and is postdom set
- return Root == 0 || Root != Root->getParent()->front();
-}
-
+AnalysisID cfg::DominatorSet::ID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominatorSet>());
+AnalysisID cfg::DominatorSet::PostDomID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominatorSet>());
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// DominatorSet Implementation
-//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+bool cfg::DominatorSet::runOnMethod(Method *M) {
+ Doms.clear(); // Reset from the last time we were run...
-// DominatorSet ctor - Build either the dominator set or the post-dominator
-// set for a method...
-//
-cfg::DominatorSet::DominatorSet(const Method *M) : DominatorBase(M->front()) {
- calcForwardDominatorSet(M);
+ if (isPostDominator())
+ calcPostDominatorSet(M);
+ else
+ calcForwardDominatorSet(M);
+ return false;
}
+
// calcForwardDominatorSet - This method calculates the forward dominator sets
// for the specified method.
//
-void cfg::DominatorSet::calcForwardDominatorSet(const Method *M) {
- assert(Root && M && "Can't build dominator set of null method!");
+void cfg::DominatorSet::calcForwardDominatorSet(Method *M) {
+ Root = M->getEntryNode();
assert(Root->pred_begin() == Root->pred_end() &&
"Root node has predecessors in method!");
@@ -64,7 +61,7 @@ void cfg::DominatorSet::calcForwardDominatorSet(const Method *M) {
Changed = false;
DomSetType WorkingSet;
- df_iterator<const Method*> It = df_begin(M), End = df_end(M);
+ df_iterator<Method*> It = df_begin(M), End = df_end(M);
for ( ; It != End; ++It) {
const BasicBlock *BB = *It;
BasicBlock::pred_const_iterator PI = BB->pred_begin(),
@@ -99,13 +96,15 @@ void cfg::DominatorSet::calcForwardDominatorSet(const Method *M) {
// only have a single exit node (return stmt), then calculates the post
// dominance sets for the method.
//
-cfg::DominatorSet::DominatorSet(Method *M, bool PostDomSet)
- : DominatorBase(M->front()) {
- if (!PostDomSet) { calcForwardDominatorSet(M); return; }
+void cfg::DominatorSet::calcPostDominatorSet(Method *M) {
+ // Since we require that the unify all exit nodes pass has been run, we know
+ // that there can be at most one return instruction in the method left.
+ // Get it.
+ //
+ Root = getAnalysis<UnifyMethodExitNodes>().getExitNode();
- Root = cfg::UnifyAllExitNodes(M);
if (Root == 0) { // No exit node for the method? Postdomsets are all empty
- for (Method::iterator MI = M->begin(), ME = M->end(); MI != ME; ++MI)
+ for (Method::const_iterator MI = M->begin(), ME = M->end(); MI != ME; ++MI)
Doms[*MI] = DomSetType();
return;
}
@@ -116,7 +115,7 @@ cfg::DominatorSet::DominatorSet(Method *M, bool PostDomSet)
set<const BasicBlock*> Visited;
DomSetType WorkingSet;
- idf_iterator<const BasicBlock*> It = idf_begin(Root), End = idf_end(Root);
+ idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> It = idf_begin(Root), End = idf_end(Root);
for ( ; It != End; ++It) {
const BasicBlock *BB = *It;
BasicBlock::succ_const_iterator PI = BB->succ_begin(),
@@ -147,11 +146,26 @@ cfg::DominatorSet::DominatorSet(Method *M, bool PostDomSet)
} while (Changed);
}
+// getAnalysisUsageInfo - This obviously provides a dominator set, but it also
+// uses the UnifyMethodExitNodes pass if building post-dominators
+//
+void cfg::DominatorSet::getAnalysisUsageInfo(Pass::AnalysisSet &Requires,
+ Pass::AnalysisSet &Destroyed,
+ Pass::AnalysisSet &Provided) {
+ if (isPostDominator())
+ Requires.push_back(UnifyMethodExitNodes::ID);
+
+ Provided.push_back(ID);
+}
+
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// ImmediateDominators Implementation
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+AnalysisID cfg::ImmediateDominators::ID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::ImmediateDominators>());
+AnalysisID cfg::ImmediateDominators::PostDomID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::ImmediateDominators>());
+
// calcIDoms - Calculate the immediate dominator mapping, given a set of
// dominators for every basic block.
void cfg::ImmediateDominators::calcIDoms(const DominatorSet &DS) {
@@ -193,14 +207,20 @@ void cfg::ImmediateDominators::calcIDoms(const DominatorSet &DS) {
// DominatorTree Implementation
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-// DominatorTree dtor - Free all of the tree node memory.
+AnalysisID cfg::DominatorTree::ID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominatorTree>());
+AnalysisID cfg::DominatorTree::PostDomID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominatorTree>());
+
+// DominatorTree::reset - Free all of the tree node memory.
//
-cfg::DominatorTree::~DominatorTree() {
+void cfg::DominatorTree::reset() {
for (NodeMapType::iterator I = Nodes.begin(), E = Nodes.end(); I != E; ++I)
delete I->second;
+ Nodes.clear();
}
+#if 0
+// Given immediate dominators, we can also calculate the dominator tree
cfg::DominatorTree::DominatorTree(const ImmediateDominators &IDoms)
: DominatorBase(IDoms.getRoot()) {
const Method *M = Root->getParent();
@@ -224,13 +244,14 @@ cfg::DominatorTree::DominatorTree(const ImmediateDominators &IDoms)
}
}
}
+#endif
void cfg::DominatorTree::calculate(const DominatorSet &DS) {
Nodes[Root] = new Node(Root, 0); // Add a node for the root...
if (!isPostDominator()) {
// Iterate over all nodes in depth first order...
- for (df_iterator<const BasicBlock*> I = df_begin(Root), E = df_end(Root);
+ for (df_iterator<BasicBlock*> I = df_begin(Root), E = df_end(Root);
I != E; ++I) {
const BasicBlock *BB = *I;
const DominatorSet::DomSetType &Dominators = DS.getDominators(BB);
@@ -271,7 +292,7 @@ void cfg::DominatorTree::calculate(const DominatorSet &DS) {
}
} else if (Root) {
// Iterate over all nodes in depth first order...
- for (idf_iterator<const BasicBlock*> I = idf_begin(Root), E = idf_end(Root);
+ for (idf_iterator<BasicBlock*> I = idf_begin(Root), E = idf_end(Root);
I != E; ++I) {
const BasicBlock *BB = *I;
const DominatorSet::DomSetType &Dominators = DS.getDominators(BB);
@@ -290,10 +311,11 @@ void cfg::DominatorTree::calculate(const DominatorSet &DS) {
DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator I = Dominators.begin();
DominatorSet::DomSetType::const_iterator End = Dominators.end();
for (; I != End; ++I) { // Iterate over dominators...
- // All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number of elements
- // in the dominator set indicates what level the node is at in the chain.
- // We want the node immediately above us, so it will have an identical
- // dominator set, except that BB will not dominate it... therefore it's
+ // All of our dominators should form a chain, where the number
+ // of elements in the dominator set indicates what level the
+ // node is at in the chain. We want the node immediately
+ // above us, so it will have an identical dominator set,
+ // except that BB will not dominate it... therefore it's
// dominator set size will be one less than BB's...
//
if (DS.getDominators(*I).size() == DomSetSize - 1) {
@@ -319,6 +341,9 @@ void cfg::DominatorTree::calculate(const DominatorSet &DS) {
// DominanceFrontier Implementation
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+AnalysisID cfg::DominanceFrontier::ID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominanceFrontier>());
+AnalysisID cfg::DominanceFrontier::PostDomID(AnalysisID::create<cfg::DominanceFrontier>());
+
const cfg::DominanceFrontier::DomSetType &
cfg::DominanceFrontier::calcDomFrontier(const DominatorTree &DT,
const DominatorTree::Node *Node) {
diff --git a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
index 0702e85..02c24aa 100644
--- a/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
+++ b/lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
// . PHI nodes must have an entry for each predecessor, with no extras.
// . All other things that are tested by asserts spread about the code...
// . All basic blocks should only end with terminator insts, not contain them
-// . All methods must have >= 1 basic block
+// . The entry node to a method must not have predecessors!
// . Verify that none of the Value getType()'s are null.
// . Method's cannot take a void typed parameter
// . Verify that a method's argument list agrees with it's declared type.