diff options
author | Shih-wei Liao <sliao@google.com> | 2010-02-10 11:10:31 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Shih-wei Liao <sliao@google.com> | 2010-02-10 11:10:31 -0800 |
commit | e264f62ca09a8f65c87a46d562a4d0f9ec5d457e (patch) | |
tree | 59e3d57ef656cef79afa708ae0a3daf25cd91fcf /test/Transforms/JumpThreading/basic.ll | |
download | external_llvm-e264f62ca09a8f65c87a46d562a4d0f9ec5d457e.zip external_llvm-e264f62ca09a8f65c87a46d562a4d0f9ec5d457e.tar.gz external_llvm-e264f62ca09a8f65c87a46d562a4d0f9ec5d457e.tar.bz2 |
Check in LLVM r95781.
Diffstat (limited to 'test/Transforms/JumpThreading/basic.ll')
-rw-r--r-- | test/Transforms/JumpThreading/basic.ll | 418 |
1 files changed, 418 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/basic.ll b/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/basic.ll new file mode 100644 index 0000000..503d301 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Transforms/JumpThreading/basic.ll @@ -0,0 +1,418 @@ +; RUN: opt %s -jump-threading -S -enable-jump-threading-lvi | FileCheck %s + +declare i32 @f1() +declare i32 @f2() +declare void @f3() + +define i32 @test1(i1 %cond) { +; CHECK: @test1 + + br i1 %cond, label %T1, label %F1 + +T1: + %v1 = call i32 @f1() + br label %Merge + +F1: + %v2 = call i32 @f2() + br label %Merge + +Merge: + %A = phi i1 [true, %T1], [false, %F1] + %B = phi i32 [%v1, %T1], [%v2, %F1] + br i1 %A, label %T2, label %F2 + +T2: +; CHECK: T2: +; CHECK: ret i32 %v1 + call void @f3() + ret i32 %B + +F2: +; CHECK: F2: +; CHECK: ret i32 %v2 + ret i32 %B +} + + +;; cond is known false on Entry -> F1 edge! +define i32 @test2(i1 %cond) { +; CHECK: @test2 +Entry: + br i1 %cond, label %T1, label %F1 + +T1: +; CHECK: %v1 = call i32 @f1() +; CHECK: ret i32 47 + %v1 = call i32 @f1() + br label %Merge + +F1: + br i1 %cond, label %Merge, label %F2 + +Merge: + %B = phi i32 [47, %T1], [192, %F1] + ret i32 %B + +F2: + call void @f3() + ret i32 12 +} + + +; Undef handling. +define i32 @test3(i1 %cond) { +; CHECK: @test3 +; CHECK-NEXT: T1: +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 42 + br i1 undef, label %T1, label %F1 + +T1: + ret i32 42 + +F1: + ret i32 17 +} + +define i32 @test4(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) { +; CHECK: @test4 + + br i1 %cond, label %T1, label %F1 + +T1: +; CHECK: %v1 = call i32 @f1() +; CHECK-NEXT: br label %T + + %v1 = call i32 @f1() + br label %Merge + +F1: + %v2 = call i32 @f2() +; CHECK: %v2 = call i32 @f2() +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cond2, + br label %Merge + +Merge: + %A = phi i1 [undef, %T1], [%cond2, %F1] + %B = phi i32 [%v1, %T1], [%v2, %F1] + br i1 %A, label %T2, label %F2 + +T2: + call void @f3() + ret i32 %B + +F2: + ret i32 %B +} + + +;; This tests that the branch in 'merge' can be cloned up into T1. +define i32 @test5(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) { +; CHECK: @test5 + + br i1 %cond, label %T1, label %F1 + +T1: +; CHECK: T1: +; CHECK-NEXT: %v1 = call i32 @f1() +; CHECK-NEXT: %cond3 = icmp eq i32 %v1, 412 +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cond3, label %T2, label %F2 + + %v1 = call i32 @f1() + %cond3 = icmp eq i32 %v1, 412 + br label %Merge + +F1: + %v2 = call i32 @f2() + br label %Merge + +Merge: + %A = phi i1 [%cond3, %T1], [%cond2, %F1] + %B = phi i32 [%v1, %T1], [%v2, %F1] + br i1 %A, label %T2, label %F2 + +T2: + call void @f3() + ret i32 %B + +F2: + ret i32 %B +} + + +;; Lexically duplicated conditionals should be threaded. + + +define i32 @test6(i32 %A) { +; CHECK: @test6 + %tmp455 = icmp eq i32 %A, 42 + br i1 %tmp455, label %BB1, label %BB2 + +BB2: +; CHECK: call i32 @f1() +; CHECK-NEXT: call void @f3() +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 4 + call i32 @f1() + br label %BB1 + + +BB1: + %tmp459 = icmp eq i32 %A, 42 + br i1 %tmp459, label %BB3, label %BB4 + +BB3: + call i32 @f2() + ret i32 3 + +BB4: + call void @f3() + ret i32 4 +} + + +;; This tests that the branch in 'merge' can be cloned up into T1. +;; rdar://7367025 +define i32 @test7(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) { +Entry: +; CHECK: @test7 + %v1 = call i32 @f1() + br i1 %cond, label %Merge, label %F1 + +F1: + %v2 = call i32 @f2() + br label %Merge + +Merge: + %B = phi i32 [%v1, %Entry], [%v2, %F1] + %M = icmp ne i32 %B, %v1 + %N = icmp eq i32 %B, 47 + %O = and i1 %M, %N + br i1 %O, label %T2, label %F2 + +; CHECK: Merge: +; CHECK-NOT: phi +; CHECK-NEXT: %v2 = call i32 @f2() + +T2: + call void @f3() + ret i32 %B + +F2: + ret i32 %B +; CHECK: F2: +; CHECK-NEXT: phi i32 +} + + +declare i1 @test8a() + +define i32 @test8b(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) { +; CHECK: @test8b +T0: + %A = call i1 @test8a() + br i1 %A, label %T1, label %F1 + +; CHECK: T0: +; CHECK-NEXT: call +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %A, label %T1, label %Y + +T1: + %B = call i1 @test8a() + br i1 %B, label %T2, label %F1 + +; CHECK: T1: +; CHECK-NEXT: call +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %B, label %T2, label %Y +T2: + %C = call i1 @test8a() + br i1 %cond, label %T3, label %F1 + +; CHECK: T2: +; CHECK-NEXT: call +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cond, label %T3, label %Y +T3: + ret i32 0 + +F1: + %D = phi i32 [0, %T0], [0, %T1], [1, %T2] + %E = icmp eq i32 %D, 1 + %F = and i1 %E, %cond + br i1 %F, label %X, label %Y +X: + call i1 @test8a() + ret i32 1 +Y: + ret i32 2 +} + + +;;; Verify that we can handle constraint propagation through "xor x, 1". +define i32 @test9(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) { +Entry: +; CHECK: @test9 + %v1 = call i32 @f1() + br i1 %cond, label %Merge, label %F1 + +; CHECK: Entry: +; CHECK-NEXT: %v1 = call i32 @f1() +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cond, label %F2, label %Merge + +F1: + %v2 = call i32 @f2() + br label %Merge + +Merge: + %B = phi i32 [%v1, %Entry], [%v2, %F1] + %M = icmp eq i32 %B, %v1 + %M1 = xor i1 %M, 1 + %N = icmp eq i32 %B, 47 + %O = and i1 %M1, %N + br i1 %O, label %T2, label %F2 + +; CHECK: Merge: +; CHECK-NOT: phi +; CHECK-NEXT: %v2 = call i32 @f2() + +T2: + %Q = zext i1 %M to i32 + ret i32 %Q + +F2: + ret i32 %B +; CHECK: F2: +; CHECK-NEXT: phi i32 +} + + + +; CHECK: @test10 +declare i32 @test10f1() +declare i32 @test10f2() +declare void @test10f3() + +;; Non-local condition threading. +define i32 @test10g(i1 %cond) { +; CHECK: @test10g +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cond, label %T2, label %F2 + br i1 %cond, label %T1, label %F1 + +T1: + %v1 = call i32 @test10f1() + br label %Merge + +; CHECK: %v1 = call i32 @test10f1() +; CHECK-NEXT: call void @f3() +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 %v1 + +F1: + %v2 = call i32 @test10f2() + br label %Merge + +Merge: + %B = phi i32 [%v1, %T1], [%v2, %F1] + br i1 %cond, label %T2, label %F2 + +T2: + call void @f3() + ret i32 %B + +F2: + ret i32 %B +} + + +; Impossible conditional constraints should get threaded. BB3 is dead here. +define i32 @test11(i32 %A) { +; CHECK: @test11 +; CHECK-NEXT: icmp +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %tmp455, label %BB4, label %BB2 + %tmp455 = icmp eq i32 %A, 42 + br i1 %tmp455, label %BB1, label %BB2 + +BB2: +; CHECK: call i32 @f1() +; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 %C + %C = call i32 @f1() + ret i32 %C + + +BB1: + %tmp459 = icmp eq i32 %A, 43 + br i1 %tmp459, label %BB3, label %BB4 + +BB3: + call i32 @f2() + ret i32 3 + +BB4: + call void @f3() + ret i32 4 +} + +;; Correlated value through boolean expression. GCC PR18046. +define void @test12(i32 %A) { +; CHECK: @test12 +entry: + %cond = icmp eq i32 %A, 0 + br i1 %cond, label %bb, label %bb1 +; Should branch to the return block instead of through BB1. +; CHECK: entry: +; CHECK-NEXT: %cond = icmp eq i32 %A, 0 +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cond, label %bb1, label %return + +bb: + %B = call i32 @test10f2() + br label %bb1 + +bb1: + %C = phi i32 [ %A, %entry ], [ %B, %bb ] + %cond4 = icmp eq i32 %C, 0 + br i1 %cond4, label %bb2, label %return + +; CHECK: bb1: +; CHECK-NEXT: %B = call i32 @test10f2() +; CHECK-NEXT: %cond4 = icmp eq i32 %B, 0 +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %cond4, label %bb2, label %return + +bb2: + %D = call i32 @test10f2() + ret void + +return: + ret void +} + + +;; Duplicate condition to avoid xor of cond. +;; rdar://7391699 +define i32 @test13(i1 %cond, i1 %cond2) { +Entry: +; CHECK: @test13 + %v1 = call i32 @f1() + br i1 %cond, label %Merge, label %F1 + +F1: + br label %Merge + +Merge: + %B = phi i1 [true, %Entry], [%cond2, %F1] + %C = phi i32 [192, %Entry], [%v1, %F1] + %M = icmp eq i32 %C, 192 + %N = xor i1 %B, %M + br i1 %N, label %T2, label %F2 + +T2: + ret i32 123 + +F2: + ret i32 %v1 + +; CHECK: br i1 %cond, label %F2, label %Merge + +; CHECK: Merge: +; CHECK-NEXT: %M = icmp eq i32 %v1, 192 +; CHECK-NEXT: %N = xor i1 %cond2, %M +; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %N, label %T2, label %F2 +} + + |