aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC/base-pointers.ll
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama@google.com>2015-04-10 22:08:18 +0000
committerAndroid Git Automerger <android-git-automerger@android.com>2015-04-10 22:08:18 +0000
commit13a7db5b9c4f5e543d037be68ec3428216bfd550 (patch)
tree1b2c9792582e12f5af0b1512e3094425f0dc0df9 /test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC/base-pointers.ll
parent0eb46f5d1e06a4284663d636a74b06adc3a161d7 (diff)
parent31195f0bdca6ee2a5e72d07edf13e1d81206d949 (diff)
downloadexternal_llvm-13a7db5b9c4f5e543d037be68ec3428216bfd550.zip
external_llvm-13a7db5b9c4f5e543d037be68ec3428216bfd550.tar.gz
external_llvm-13a7db5b9c4f5e543d037be68ec3428216bfd550.tar.bz2
am 31195f0b: Merge "Update aosp/master llvm for rebase to r233350"
* commit '31195f0bdca6ee2a5e72d07edf13e1d81206d949': Update aosp/master llvm for rebase to r233350
Diffstat (limited to 'test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC/base-pointers.ll')
-rw-r--r--test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC/base-pointers.ll98
1 files changed, 98 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC/base-pointers.ll b/test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC/base-pointers.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c5035eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/Transforms/RewriteStatepointsForGC/base-pointers.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+; RUN: opt %s -rewrite-statepoints-for-gc -S 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+declare i64 addrspace(1)* @generate_obj()
+declare void @use_obj(i64 addrspace(1)*)
+
+; The rewriting needs to make %obj loop variant by inserting a phi
+; of the original value and it's relocation.
+define void @def_use_safepoint() gc "statepoint-example" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: def_use_safepoint
+entry:
+ %obj = call i64 addrspace(1)* @generate_obj()
+ br label %loop
+
+loop:
+; CHECK: phi i64 addrspace(1)*
+; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj.relocated, %loop ]
+; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj, %entry ]
+ call void @use_obj(i64 addrspace(1)* %obj)
+ %safepoint_token = call i32 (void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(void ()* @do_safepoint, i32 0, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
+ br label %loop
+}
+
+declare void @do_safepoint()
+
+declare void @parse_point(i64 addrspace(1)*)
+
+define i64 addrspace(1)* @test1(i32 %caller, i8 addrspace(1)* %a, i8 addrspace(1)* %b, i32 %unknown) gc "statepoint-example" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test1
+ entry:
+ br i1 undef, label %left, label %right
+
+ left:
+ %a.cast = bitcast i8 addrspace(1)* %a to i64 addrspace(1)*
+; CHECK: left:
+; CHECK-NEXT: %a.cast = bitcast i8 addrspace(1)* %a to i64 addrspace(1)*
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[CAST_L:%.*]] = bitcast i8 addrspace(1)* %a to i64 addrspace(1)*
+
+; Our safepoint placement pass calls removeUnreachableBlocks, which does a bunch
+; of simplifications to branch instructions. This bug is visible only when
+; there are multiple branches into the same block from the same predecessor, and
+; the following ceremony is to make that artefact survive a call to
+; removeUnreachableBlocks. As an example, "br i1 undef, label %merge, label %merge"
+; will get simplified to "br label %merge" by removeUnreachableBlocks.
+ switch i32 %unknown, label %right [ i32 0, label %merge
+ i32 1, label %merge
+ i32 5, label %merge
+ i32 3, label %right ]
+
+ right:
+ %b.cast = bitcast i8 addrspace(1)* %b to i64 addrspace(1)*
+ br label %merge
+; CHECK: right:
+; CHECK-NEXT: %b.cast = bitcast i8 addrspace(1)* %b to i64 addrspace(1)*
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[CAST_R:%.*]] = bitcast i8 addrspace(1)* %b to i64 addrspace(1)*
+
+ merge:
+; CHECK: merge:
+; CHECK-NEXT: %base_phi = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ [[CAST_L]], %left ], [ [[CAST_L]], %left ], [ [[CAST_L]], %left ], [ [[CAST_R]], %right ], !is_base_value !0
+ %value = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %a.cast, %left], [ %a.cast, %left], [ %a.cast, %left], [ %b.cast, %right]
+ %safepoint_token = call i32 (void (i64 addrspace(1)*)*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidp1i64f(void (i64 addrspace(1)*)* @parse_point, i32 1, i32 0, i64 addrspace(1)* %value, i32 5, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
+
+ ret i64 addrspace(1)* %value
+}
+
+;; The purpose of this test is to ensure that when two live values share a
+;; base defining value with inherent conflicts, we end up with a *single*
+;; base phi/select per such node. This is testing an optimization, not a
+;; fundemental correctness criteria
+define void @test2(i1 %cnd, i64 addrspace(1)* %base_obj, i64 addrspace(1)* %base_arg2) gc "statepoint-example" {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @test2
+entry:
+ %obj = getelementptr i64, i64 addrspace(1)* %base_obj, i32 1
+ br label %loop
+
+loop: ; preds = %loop, %entry
+; CHECK-LABEL: loop
+; CHECK: %base_phi = phi i64 addrspace(1)*
+; CHECK-DAG: [ %base_obj, %entry ]
+; CHECK-DAG: [ %base_select.relocated, %loop ]
+; CHECK-NOT: base_phi2
+; CHECK: next = select
+; CHECK: base_select
+; CHECK: extra2 = select
+; CHECK: base_select
+; CHECK: statepoint
+;; Both 'next' and 'extra2' are live across the backedge safepoint...
+ %current = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj, %entry ], [ %next, %loop ]
+ %extra = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj, %entry ], [ %extra2, %loop ]
+ %nexta = getelementptr i64, i64 addrspace(1)* %current, i32 1
+ %next = select i1 %cnd, i64 addrspace(1)* %nexta, i64 addrspace(1)* %base_arg2
+ %extra2 = select i1 %cnd, i64 addrspace(1)* %nexta, i64 addrspace(1)* %base_arg2
+ %safepoint_token = call i32 (void ()*, i32, i32, ...)* @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(void ()* @foo, i32 0, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
+ br label %loop
+}
+
+declare void @foo()
+declare i32 @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidf(void ()*, i32, i32, ...)
+declare i32 @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidp1i64f(void (i64 addrspace(1)*)*, i32, i32, ...)