diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp | 1396 |
1 files changed, 1396 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp b/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7bedd40 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,1396 @@ +//===- LoopAccessAnalysis.cpp - Loop Access Analysis Implementation --------==// +// +// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure +// +// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source +// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details. +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// +// +// The implementation for the loop memory dependence that was originally +// developed for the loop vectorizer. +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopAccessAnalysis.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h" +#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h" +#include "llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h" +#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h" +#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h" +#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h" +#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/VectorUtils.h" +using namespace llvm; + +#define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-accesses" + +static cl::opt<unsigned, true> +VectorizationFactor("force-vector-width", cl::Hidden, + cl::desc("Sets the SIMD width. Zero is autoselect."), + cl::location(VectorizerParams::VectorizationFactor)); +unsigned VectorizerParams::VectorizationFactor; + +static cl::opt<unsigned, true> +VectorizationInterleave("force-vector-interleave", cl::Hidden, + cl::desc("Sets the vectorization interleave count. " + "Zero is autoselect."), + cl::location( + VectorizerParams::VectorizationInterleave)); +unsigned VectorizerParams::VectorizationInterleave; + +static cl::opt<unsigned, true> RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold( + "runtime-memory-check-threshold", cl::Hidden, + cl::desc("When performing memory disambiguation checks at runtime do not " + "generate more than this number of comparisons (default = 8)."), + cl::location(VectorizerParams::RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold), cl::init(8)); +unsigned VectorizerParams::RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold; + +/// Maximum SIMD width. +const unsigned VectorizerParams::MaxVectorWidth = 64; + +bool VectorizerParams::isInterleaveForced() { + return ::VectorizationInterleave.getNumOccurrences() > 0; +} + +void LoopAccessReport::emitAnalysis(const LoopAccessReport &Message, + const Function *TheFunction, + const Loop *TheLoop, + const char *PassName) { + DebugLoc DL = TheLoop->getStartLoc(); + if (const Instruction *I = Message.getInstr()) + DL = I->getDebugLoc(); + emitOptimizationRemarkAnalysis(TheFunction->getContext(), PassName, + *TheFunction, DL, Message.str()); +} + +Value *llvm::stripIntegerCast(Value *V) { + if (CastInst *CI = dyn_cast<CastInst>(V)) + if (CI->getOperand(0)->getType()->isIntegerTy()) + return CI->getOperand(0); + return V; +} + +const SCEV *llvm::replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV(ScalarEvolution *SE, + const ValueToValueMap &PtrToStride, + Value *Ptr, Value *OrigPtr) { + + const SCEV *OrigSCEV = SE->getSCEV(Ptr); + + // If there is an entry in the map return the SCEV of the pointer with the + // symbolic stride replaced by one. + ValueToValueMap::const_iterator SI = + PtrToStride.find(OrigPtr ? OrigPtr : Ptr); + if (SI != PtrToStride.end()) { + Value *StrideVal = SI->second; + + // Strip casts. + StrideVal = stripIntegerCast(StrideVal); + + // Replace symbolic stride by one. + Value *One = ConstantInt::get(StrideVal->getType(), 1); + ValueToValueMap RewriteMap; + RewriteMap[StrideVal] = One; + + const SCEV *ByOne = + SCEVParameterRewriter::rewrite(OrigSCEV, *SE, RewriteMap, true); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Replacing SCEV: " << *OrigSCEV << " by: " << *ByOne + << "\n"); + return ByOne; + } + + // Otherwise, just return the SCEV of the original pointer. + return SE->getSCEV(Ptr); +} + +void LoopAccessInfo::RuntimePointerCheck::insert( + ScalarEvolution *SE, Loop *Lp, Value *Ptr, bool WritePtr, unsigned DepSetId, + unsigned ASId, const ValueToValueMap &Strides) { + // Get the stride replaced scev. + const SCEV *Sc = replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV(SE, Strides, Ptr); + const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Sc); + assert(AR && "Invalid addrec expression"); + const SCEV *Ex = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(Lp); + const SCEV *ScEnd = AR->evaluateAtIteration(Ex, *SE); + Pointers.push_back(Ptr); + Starts.push_back(AR->getStart()); + Ends.push_back(ScEnd); + IsWritePtr.push_back(WritePtr); + DependencySetId.push_back(DepSetId); + AliasSetId.push_back(ASId); +} + +bool LoopAccessInfo::RuntimePointerCheck::needsChecking(unsigned I, + unsigned J) const { + // No need to check if two readonly pointers intersect. + if (!IsWritePtr[I] && !IsWritePtr[J]) + return false; + + // Only need to check pointers between two different dependency sets. + if (DependencySetId[I] == DependencySetId[J]) + return false; + + // Only need to check pointers in the same alias set. + if (AliasSetId[I] != AliasSetId[J]) + return false; + + return true; +} + +void LoopAccessInfo::RuntimePointerCheck::print(raw_ostream &OS, + unsigned Depth) const { + unsigned NumPointers = Pointers.size(); + if (NumPointers == 0) + return; + + OS.indent(Depth) << "Run-time memory checks:\n"; + unsigned N = 0; + for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumPointers; ++I) + for (unsigned J = I + 1; J < NumPointers; ++J) + if (needsChecking(I, J)) { + OS.indent(Depth) << N++ << ":\n"; + OS.indent(Depth + 2) << *Pointers[I] << "\n"; + OS.indent(Depth + 2) << *Pointers[J] << "\n"; + } +} + +namespace { +/// \brief Analyses memory accesses in a loop. +/// +/// Checks whether run time pointer checks are needed and builds sets for data +/// dependence checking. +class AccessAnalysis { +public: + /// \brief Read or write access location. + typedef PointerIntPair<Value *, 1, bool> MemAccessInfo; + typedef SmallPtrSet<MemAccessInfo, 8> MemAccessInfoSet; + + /// \brief Set of potential dependent memory accesses. + typedef EquivalenceClasses<MemAccessInfo> DepCandidates; + + AccessAnalysis(const DataLayout *Dl, AliasAnalysis *AA, DepCandidates &DA) : + DL(Dl), AST(*AA), DepCands(DA), IsRTCheckNeeded(false) {} + + /// \brief Register a load and whether it is only read from. + void addLoad(AliasAnalysis::Location &Loc, bool IsReadOnly) { + Value *Ptr = const_cast<Value*>(Loc.Ptr); + AST.add(Ptr, AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, Loc.AATags); + Accesses.insert(MemAccessInfo(Ptr, false)); + if (IsReadOnly) + ReadOnlyPtr.insert(Ptr); + } + + /// \brief Register a store. + void addStore(AliasAnalysis::Location &Loc) { + Value *Ptr = const_cast<Value*>(Loc.Ptr); + AST.add(Ptr, AliasAnalysis::UnknownSize, Loc.AATags); + Accesses.insert(MemAccessInfo(Ptr, true)); + } + + /// \brief Check whether we can check the pointers at runtime for + /// non-intersection. + bool canCheckPtrAtRT(LoopAccessInfo::RuntimePointerCheck &RtCheck, + unsigned &NumComparisons, ScalarEvolution *SE, + Loop *TheLoop, const ValueToValueMap &Strides, + bool ShouldCheckStride = false); + + /// \brief Goes over all memory accesses, checks whether a RT check is needed + /// and builds sets of dependent accesses. + void buildDependenceSets() { + processMemAccesses(); + } + + bool isRTCheckNeeded() { return IsRTCheckNeeded; } + + bool isDependencyCheckNeeded() { return !CheckDeps.empty(); } + void resetDepChecks() { CheckDeps.clear(); } + + MemAccessInfoSet &getDependenciesToCheck() { return CheckDeps; } + +private: + typedef SetVector<MemAccessInfo> PtrAccessSet; + + /// \brief Go over all memory access and check whether runtime pointer checks + /// are needed /// and build sets of dependency check candidates. + void processMemAccesses(); + + /// Set of all accesses. + PtrAccessSet Accesses; + + /// Set of accesses that need a further dependence check. + MemAccessInfoSet CheckDeps; + + /// Set of pointers that are read only. + SmallPtrSet<Value*, 16> ReadOnlyPtr; + + const DataLayout *DL; + + /// An alias set tracker to partition the access set by underlying object and + //intrinsic property (such as TBAA metadata). + AliasSetTracker AST; + + /// Sets of potentially dependent accesses - members of one set share an + /// underlying pointer. The set "CheckDeps" identfies which sets really need a + /// dependence check. + DepCandidates &DepCands; + + bool IsRTCheckNeeded; +}; + +} // end anonymous namespace + +/// \brief Check whether a pointer can participate in a runtime bounds check. +static bool hasComputableBounds(ScalarEvolution *SE, + const ValueToValueMap &Strides, Value *Ptr) { + const SCEV *PtrScev = replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV(SE, Strides, Ptr); + const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(PtrScev); + if (!AR) + return false; + + return AR->isAffine(); +} + +/// \brief Check the stride of the pointer and ensure that it does not wrap in +/// the address space. +static int isStridedPtr(ScalarEvolution *SE, const DataLayout *DL, Value *Ptr, + const Loop *Lp, const ValueToValueMap &StridesMap); + +bool AccessAnalysis::canCheckPtrAtRT( + LoopAccessInfo::RuntimePointerCheck &RtCheck, unsigned &NumComparisons, + ScalarEvolution *SE, Loop *TheLoop, const ValueToValueMap &StridesMap, + bool ShouldCheckStride) { + // Find pointers with computable bounds. We are going to use this information + // to place a runtime bound check. + bool CanDoRT = true; + + bool IsDepCheckNeeded = isDependencyCheckNeeded(); + NumComparisons = 0; + + // We assign a consecutive id to access from different alias sets. + // Accesses between different groups doesn't need to be checked. + unsigned ASId = 1; + for (auto &AS : AST) { + unsigned NumReadPtrChecks = 0; + unsigned NumWritePtrChecks = 0; + + // We assign consecutive id to access from different dependence sets. + // Accesses within the same set don't need a runtime check. + unsigned RunningDepId = 1; + DenseMap<Value *, unsigned> DepSetId; + + for (auto A : AS) { + Value *Ptr = A.getValue(); + bool IsWrite = Accesses.count(MemAccessInfo(Ptr, true)); + MemAccessInfo Access(Ptr, IsWrite); + + if (IsWrite) + ++NumWritePtrChecks; + else + ++NumReadPtrChecks; + + if (hasComputableBounds(SE, StridesMap, Ptr) && + // When we run after a failing dependency check we have to make sure we + // don't have wrapping pointers. + (!ShouldCheckStride || + isStridedPtr(SE, DL, Ptr, TheLoop, StridesMap) == 1)) { + // The id of the dependence set. + unsigned DepId; + + if (IsDepCheckNeeded) { + Value *Leader = DepCands.getLeaderValue(Access).getPointer(); + unsigned &LeaderId = DepSetId[Leader]; + if (!LeaderId) + LeaderId = RunningDepId++; + DepId = LeaderId; + } else + // Each access has its own dependence set. + DepId = RunningDepId++; + + RtCheck.insert(SE, TheLoop, Ptr, IsWrite, DepId, ASId, StridesMap); + + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a runtime check ptr:" << *Ptr << '\n'); + } else { + CanDoRT = false; + } + } + + if (IsDepCheckNeeded && CanDoRT && RunningDepId == 2) + NumComparisons += 0; // Only one dependence set. + else { + NumComparisons += (NumWritePtrChecks * (NumReadPtrChecks + + NumWritePtrChecks - 1)); + } + + ++ASId; + } + + // If the pointers that we would use for the bounds comparison have different + // address spaces, assume the values aren't directly comparable, so we can't + // use them for the runtime check. We also have to assume they could + // overlap. In the future there should be metadata for whether address spaces + // are disjoint. + unsigned NumPointers = RtCheck.Pointers.size(); + for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumPointers; ++i) { + for (unsigned j = i + 1; j < NumPointers; ++j) { + // Only need to check pointers between two different dependency sets. + if (RtCheck.DependencySetId[i] == RtCheck.DependencySetId[j]) + continue; + // Only need to check pointers in the same alias set. + if (RtCheck.AliasSetId[i] != RtCheck.AliasSetId[j]) + continue; + + Value *PtrI = RtCheck.Pointers[i]; + Value *PtrJ = RtCheck.Pointers[j]; + + unsigned ASi = PtrI->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(); + unsigned ASj = PtrJ->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(); + if (ASi != ASj) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Runtime check would require comparison between" + " different address spaces\n"); + return false; + } + } + } + + return CanDoRT; +} + +void AccessAnalysis::processMemAccesses() { + // We process the set twice: first we process read-write pointers, last we + // process read-only pointers. This allows us to skip dependence tests for + // read-only pointers. + + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Processing memory accesses...\n"); + DEBUG(dbgs() << " AST: "; AST.dump()); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Accesses:\n"); + DEBUG({ + for (auto A : Accesses) + dbgs() << "\t" << *A.getPointer() << " (" << + (A.getInt() ? "write" : (ReadOnlyPtr.count(A.getPointer()) ? + "read-only" : "read")) << ")\n"; + }); + + // The AliasSetTracker has nicely partitioned our pointers by metadata + // compatibility and potential for underlying-object overlap. As a result, we + // only need to check for potential pointer dependencies within each alias + // set. + for (auto &AS : AST) { + // Note that both the alias-set tracker and the alias sets themselves used + // linked lists internally and so the iteration order here is deterministic + // (matching the original instruction order within each set). + + bool SetHasWrite = false; + + // Map of pointers to last access encountered. + typedef DenseMap<Value*, MemAccessInfo> UnderlyingObjToAccessMap; + UnderlyingObjToAccessMap ObjToLastAccess; + + // Set of access to check after all writes have been processed. + PtrAccessSet DeferredAccesses; + + // Iterate over each alias set twice, once to process read/write pointers, + // and then to process read-only pointers. + for (int SetIteration = 0; SetIteration < 2; ++SetIteration) { + bool UseDeferred = SetIteration > 0; + PtrAccessSet &S = UseDeferred ? DeferredAccesses : Accesses; + + for (auto AV : AS) { + Value *Ptr = AV.getValue(); + + // For a single memory access in AliasSetTracker, Accesses may contain + // both read and write, and they both need to be handled for CheckDeps. + for (auto AC : S) { + if (AC.getPointer() != Ptr) + continue; + + bool IsWrite = AC.getInt(); + + // If we're using the deferred access set, then it contains only + // reads. + bool IsReadOnlyPtr = ReadOnlyPtr.count(Ptr) && !IsWrite; + if (UseDeferred && !IsReadOnlyPtr) + continue; + // Otherwise, the pointer must be in the PtrAccessSet, either as a + // read or a write. + assert(((IsReadOnlyPtr && UseDeferred) || IsWrite || + S.count(MemAccessInfo(Ptr, false))) && + "Alias-set pointer not in the access set?"); + + MemAccessInfo Access(Ptr, IsWrite); + DepCands.insert(Access); + + // Memorize read-only pointers for later processing and skip them in + // the first round (they need to be checked after we have seen all + // write pointers). Note: we also mark pointer that are not + // consecutive as "read-only" pointers (so that we check + // "a[b[i]] +="). Hence, we need the second check for "!IsWrite". + if (!UseDeferred && IsReadOnlyPtr) { + DeferredAccesses.insert(Access); + continue; + } + + // If this is a write - check other reads and writes for conflicts. If + // this is a read only check other writes for conflicts (but only if + // there is no other write to the ptr - this is an optimization to + // catch "a[i] = a[i] + " without having to do a dependence check). + if ((IsWrite || IsReadOnlyPtr) && SetHasWrite) { + CheckDeps.insert(Access); + IsRTCheckNeeded = true; + } + + if (IsWrite) + SetHasWrite = true; + + // Create sets of pointers connected by a shared alias set and + // underlying object. + typedef SmallVector<Value *, 16> ValueVector; + ValueVector TempObjects; + GetUnderlyingObjects(Ptr, TempObjects, DL); + for (Value *UnderlyingObj : TempObjects) { + UnderlyingObjToAccessMap::iterator Prev = + ObjToLastAccess.find(UnderlyingObj); + if (Prev != ObjToLastAccess.end()) + DepCands.unionSets(Access, Prev->second); + + ObjToLastAccess[UnderlyingObj] = Access; + } + } + } + } + } +} + +namespace { +/// \brief Checks memory dependences among accesses to the same underlying +/// object to determine whether there vectorization is legal or not (and at +/// which vectorization factor). +/// +/// This class works under the assumption that we already checked that memory +/// locations with different underlying pointers are "must-not alias". +/// We use the ScalarEvolution framework to symbolically evalutate access +/// functions pairs. Since we currently don't restructure the loop we can rely +/// on the program order of memory accesses to determine their safety. +/// At the moment we will only deem accesses as safe for: +/// * A negative constant distance assuming program order. +/// +/// Safe: tmp = a[i + 1]; OR a[i + 1] = x; +/// a[i] = tmp; y = a[i]; +/// +/// The latter case is safe because later checks guarantuee that there can't +/// be a cycle through a phi node (that is, we check that "x" and "y" is not +/// the same variable: a header phi can only be an induction or a reduction, a +/// reduction can't have a memory sink, an induction can't have a memory +/// source). This is important and must not be violated (or we have to +/// resort to checking for cycles through memory). +/// +/// * A positive constant distance assuming program order that is bigger +/// than the biggest memory access. +/// +/// tmp = a[i] OR b[i] = x +/// a[i+2] = tmp y = b[i+2]; +/// +/// Safe distance: 2 x sizeof(a[0]), and 2 x sizeof(b[0]), respectively. +/// +/// * Zero distances and all accesses have the same size. +/// +class MemoryDepChecker { +public: + typedef PointerIntPair<Value *, 1, bool> MemAccessInfo; + typedef SmallPtrSet<MemAccessInfo, 8> MemAccessInfoSet; + + MemoryDepChecker(ScalarEvolution *Se, const DataLayout *Dl, const Loop *L) + : SE(Se), DL(Dl), InnermostLoop(L), AccessIdx(0), + ShouldRetryWithRuntimeCheck(false) {} + + /// \brief Register the location (instructions are given increasing numbers) + /// of a write access. + void addAccess(StoreInst *SI) { + Value *Ptr = SI->getPointerOperand(); + Accesses[MemAccessInfo(Ptr, true)].push_back(AccessIdx); + InstMap.push_back(SI); + ++AccessIdx; + } + + /// \brief Register the location (instructions are given increasing numbers) + /// of a write access. + void addAccess(LoadInst *LI) { + Value *Ptr = LI->getPointerOperand(); + Accesses[MemAccessInfo(Ptr, false)].push_back(AccessIdx); + InstMap.push_back(LI); + ++AccessIdx; + } + + /// \brief Check whether the dependencies between the accesses are safe. + /// + /// Only checks sets with elements in \p CheckDeps. + bool areDepsSafe(AccessAnalysis::DepCandidates &AccessSets, + MemAccessInfoSet &CheckDeps, const ValueToValueMap &Strides); + + /// \brief The maximum number of bytes of a vector register we can vectorize + /// the accesses safely with. + unsigned getMaxSafeDepDistBytes() { return MaxSafeDepDistBytes; } + + /// \brief In same cases when the dependency check fails we can still + /// vectorize the loop with a dynamic array access check. + bool shouldRetryWithRuntimeCheck() { return ShouldRetryWithRuntimeCheck; } + +private: + ScalarEvolution *SE; + const DataLayout *DL; + const Loop *InnermostLoop; + + /// \brief Maps access locations (ptr, read/write) to program order. + DenseMap<MemAccessInfo, std::vector<unsigned> > Accesses; + + /// \brief Memory access instructions in program order. + SmallVector<Instruction *, 16> InstMap; + + /// \brief The program order index to be used for the next instruction. + unsigned AccessIdx; + + // We can access this many bytes in parallel safely. + unsigned MaxSafeDepDistBytes; + + /// \brief If we see a non-constant dependence distance we can still try to + /// vectorize this loop with runtime checks. + bool ShouldRetryWithRuntimeCheck; + + /// \brief Check whether there is a plausible dependence between the two + /// accesses. + /// + /// Access \p A must happen before \p B in program order. The two indices + /// identify the index into the program order map. + /// + /// This function checks whether there is a plausible dependence (or the + /// absence of such can't be proved) between the two accesses. If there is a + /// plausible dependence but the dependence distance is bigger than one + /// element access it records this distance in \p MaxSafeDepDistBytes (if this + /// distance is smaller than any other distance encountered so far). + /// Otherwise, this function returns true signaling a possible dependence. + bool isDependent(const MemAccessInfo &A, unsigned AIdx, + const MemAccessInfo &B, unsigned BIdx, + const ValueToValueMap &Strides); + + /// \brief Check whether the data dependence could prevent store-load + /// forwarding. + bool couldPreventStoreLoadForward(unsigned Distance, unsigned TypeByteSize); +}; + +} // end anonymous namespace + +static bool isInBoundsGep(Value *Ptr) { + if (GetElementPtrInst *GEP = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(Ptr)) + return GEP->isInBounds(); + return false; +} + +/// \brief Check whether the access through \p Ptr has a constant stride. +static int isStridedPtr(ScalarEvolution *SE, const DataLayout *DL, Value *Ptr, + const Loop *Lp, const ValueToValueMap &StridesMap) { + const Type *Ty = Ptr->getType(); + assert(Ty->isPointerTy() && "Unexpected non-ptr"); + + // Make sure that the pointer does not point to aggregate types. + const PointerType *PtrTy = cast<PointerType>(Ty); + if (PtrTy->getElementType()->isAggregateType()) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Bad stride - Not a pointer to a scalar type" + << *Ptr << "\n"); + return 0; + } + + const SCEV *PtrScev = replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV(SE, StridesMap, Ptr); + + const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(PtrScev); + if (!AR) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Bad stride - Not an AddRecExpr pointer " + << *Ptr << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n"); + return 0; + } + + // The accesss function must stride over the innermost loop. + if (Lp != AR->getLoop()) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Bad stride - Not striding over innermost loop " << + *Ptr << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n"); + } + + // The address calculation must not wrap. Otherwise, a dependence could be + // inverted. + // An inbounds getelementptr that is a AddRec with a unit stride + // cannot wrap per definition. The unit stride requirement is checked later. + // An getelementptr without an inbounds attribute and unit stride would have + // to access the pointer value "0" which is undefined behavior in address + // space 0, therefore we can also vectorize this case. + bool IsInBoundsGEP = isInBoundsGep(Ptr); + bool IsNoWrapAddRec = AR->getNoWrapFlags(SCEV::NoWrapMask); + bool IsInAddressSpaceZero = PtrTy->getAddressSpace() == 0; + if (!IsNoWrapAddRec && !IsInBoundsGEP && !IsInAddressSpaceZero) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Bad stride - Pointer may wrap in the address space " + << *Ptr << " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n"); + return 0; + } + + // Check the step is constant. + const SCEV *Step = AR->getStepRecurrence(*SE); + + // Calculate the pointer stride and check if it is consecutive. + const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Step); + if (!C) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Bad stride - Not a constant strided " << *Ptr << + " SCEV: " << *PtrScev << "\n"); + return 0; + } + + int64_t Size = DL->getTypeAllocSize(PtrTy->getElementType()); + const APInt &APStepVal = C->getValue()->getValue(); + + // Huge step value - give up. + if (APStepVal.getBitWidth() > 64) + return 0; + + int64_t StepVal = APStepVal.getSExtValue(); + + // Strided access. + int64_t Stride = StepVal / Size; + int64_t Rem = StepVal % Size; + if (Rem) + return 0; + + // If the SCEV could wrap but we have an inbounds gep with a unit stride we + // know we can't "wrap around the address space". In case of address space + // zero we know that this won't happen without triggering undefined behavior. + if (!IsNoWrapAddRec && (IsInBoundsGEP || IsInAddressSpaceZero) && + Stride != 1 && Stride != -1) + return 0; + + return Stride; +} + +bool MemoryDepChecker::couldPreventStoreLoadForward(unsigned Distance, + unsigned TypeByteSize) { + // If loads occur at a distance that is not a multiple of a feasible vector + // factor store-load forwarding does not take place. + // Positive dependences might cause troubles because vectorizing them might + // prevent store-load forwarding making vectorized code run a lot slower. + // a[i] = a[i-3] ^ a[i-8]; + // The stores to a[i:i+1] don't align with the stores to a[i-3:i-2] and + // hence on your typical architecture store-load forwarding does not take + // place. Vectorizing in such cases does not make sense. + // Store-load forwarding distance. + const unsigned NumCyclesForStoreLoadThroughMemory = 8*TypeByteSize; + // Maximum vector factor. + unsigned MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues = + VectorizerParams::MaxVectorWidth * TypeByteSize; + if(MaxSafeDepDistBytes < MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues) + MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues = MaxSafeDepDistBytes; + + for (unsigned vf = 2*TypeByteSize; vf <= MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues; + vf *= 2) { + if (Distance % vf && Distance / vf < NumCyclesForStoreLoadThroughMemory) { + MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues = (vf >>=1); + break; + } + } + + if (MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues< 2*TypeByteSize) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Distance " << Distance << + " that could cause a store-load forwarding conflict\n"); + return true; + } + + if (MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues < MaxSafeDepDistBytes && + MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues != + VectorizerParams::MaxVectorWidth * TypeByteSize) + MaxSafeDepDistBytes = MaxVFWithoutSLForwardIssues; + return false; +} + +bool MemoryDepChecker::isDependent(const MemAccessInfo &A, unsigned AIdx, + const MemAccessInfo &B, unsigned BIdx, + const ValueToValueMap &Strides) { + assert (AIdx < BIdx && "Must pass arguments in program order"); + + Value *APtr = A.getPointer(); + Value *BPtr = B.getPointer(); + bool AIsWrite = A.getInt(); + bool BIsWrite = B.getInt(); + + // Two reads are independent. + if (!AIsWrite && !BIsWrite) + return false; + + // We cannot check pointers in different address spaces. + if (APtr->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace() != + BPtr->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace()) + return true; + + const SCEV *AScev = replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV(SE, Strides, APtr); + const SCEV *BScev = replaceSymbolicStrideSCEV(SE, Strides, BPtr); + + int StrideAPtr = isStridedPtr(SE, DL, APtr, InnermostLoop, Strides); + int StrideBPtr = isStridedPtr(SE, DL, BPtr, InnermostLoop, Strides); + + const SCEV *Src = AScev; + const SCEV *Sink = BScev; + + // If the induction step is negative we have to invert source and sink of the + // dependence. + if (StrideAPtr < 0) { + //Src = BScev; + //Sink = AScev; + std::swap(APtr, BPtr); + std::swap(Src, Sink); + std::swap(AIsWrite, BIsWrite); + std::swap(AIdx, BIdx); + std::swap(StrideAPtr, StrideBPtr); + } + + const SCEV *Dist = SE->getMinusSCEV(Sink, Src); + + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Src Scev: " << *Src << "Sink Scev: " << *Sink + << "(Induction step: " << StrideAPtr << ")\n"); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Distance for " << *InstMap[AIdx] << " to " + << *InstMap[BIdx] << ": " << *Dist << "\n"); + + // Need consecutive accesses. We don't want to vectorize + // "A[B[i]] += ..." and similar code or pointer arithmetic that could wrap in + // the address space. + if (!StrideAPtr || !StrideBPtr || StrideAPtr != StrideBPtr){ + DEBUG(dbgs() << "Non-consecutive pointer access\n"); + return true; + } + + const SCEVConstant *C = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Dist); + if (!C) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Dependence because of non-constant distance\n"); + ShouldRetryWithRuntimeCheck = true; + return true; + } + + Type *ATy = APtr->getType()->getPointerElementType(); + Type *BTy = BPtr->getType()->getPointerElementType(); + unsigned TypeByteSize = DL->getTypeAllocSize(ATy); + + // Negative distances are not plausible dependencies. + const APInt &Val = C->getValue()->getValue(); + if (Val.isNegative()) { + bool IsTrueDataDependence = (AIsWrite && !BIsWrite); + if (IsTrueDataDependence && + (couldPreventStoreLoadForward(Val.abs().getZExtValue(), TypeByteSize) || + ATy != BTy)) + return true; + + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Dependence is negative: NoDep\n"); + return false; + } + + // Write to the same location with the same size. + // Could be improved to assert type sizes are the same (i32 == float, etc). + if (Val == 0) { + if (ATy == BTy) + return false; + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Zero dependence difference but different types\n"); + return true; + } + + assert(Val.isStrictlyPositive() && "Expect a positive value"); + + if (ATy != BTy) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << + "LAA: ReadWrite-Write positive dependency with different types\n"); + return true; + } + + unsigned Distance = (unsigned) Val.getZExtValue(); + + // Bail out early if passed-in parameters make vectorization not feasible. + unsigned ForcedFactor = (VectorizerParams::VectorizationFactor ? + VectorizerParams::VectorizationFactor : 1); + unsigned ForcedUnroll = (VectorizerParams::VectorizationInterleave ? + VectorizerParams::VectorizationInterleave : 1); + + // The distance must be bigger than the size needed for a vectorized version + // of the operation and the size of the vectorized operation must not be + // bigger than the currrent maximum size. + if (Distance < 2*TypeByteSize || + 2*TypeByteSize > MaxSafeDepDistBytes || + Distance < TypeByteSize * ForcedUnroll * ForcedFactor) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Failure because of Positive distance " + << Val.getSExtValue() << '\n'); + return true; + } + + // Positive distance bigger than max vectorization factor. + MaxSafeDepDistBytes = Distance < MaxSafeDepDistBytes ? + Distance : MaxSafeDepDistBytes; + + bool IsTrueDataDependence = (!AIsWrite && BIsWrite); + if (IsTrueDataDependence && + couldPreventStoreLoadForward(Distance, TypeByteSize)) + return true; + + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Positive distance " << Val.getSExtValue() << + " with max VF = " << MaxSafeDepDistBytes / TypeByteSize << '\n'); + + return false; +} + +bool MemoryDepChecker::areDepsSafe(AccessAnalysis::DepCandidates &AccessSets, + MemAccessInfoSet &CheckDeps, + const ValueToValueMap &Strides) { + + MaxSafeDepDistBytes = -1U; + while (!CheckDeps.empty()) { + MemAccessInfo CurAccess = *CheckDeps.begin(); + + // Get the relevant memory access set. + EquivalenceClasses<MemAccessInfo>::iterator I = + AccessSets.findValue(AccessSets.getLeaderValue(CurAccess)); + + // Check accesses within this set. + EquivalenceClasses<MemAccessInfo>::member_iterator AI, AE; + AI = AccessSets.member_begin(I), AE = AccessSets.member_end(); + + // Check every access pair. + while (AI != AE) { + CheckDeps.erase(*AI); + EquivalenceClasses<MemAccessInfo>::member_iterator OI = std::next(AI); + while (OI != AE) { + // Check every accessing instruction pair in program order. + for (std::vector<unsigned>::iterator I1 = Accesses[*AI].begin(), + I1E = Accesses[*AI].end(); I1 != I1E; ++I1) + for (std::vector<unsigned>::iterator I2 = Accesses[*OI].begin(), + I2E = Accesses[*OI].end(); I2 != I2E; ++I2) { + if (*I1 < *I2 && isDependent(*AI, *I1, *OI, *I2, Strides)) + return false; + if (*I2 < *I1 && isDependent(*OI, *I2, *AI, *I1, Strides)) + return false; + } + ++OI; + } + AI++; + } + } + return true; +} + +bool LoopAccessInfo::canAnalyzeLoop() { + // We can only analyze innermost loops. + if (!TheLoop->empty()) { + emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport() << "loop is not the innermost loop"); + return false; + } + + // We must have a single backedge. + if (TheLoop->getNumBackEdges() != 1) { + emitAnalysis( + LoopAccessReport() << + "loop control flow is not understood by analyzer"); + return false; + } + + // We must have a single exiting block. + if (!TheLoop->getExitingBlock()) { + emitAnalysis( + LoopAccessReport() << + "loop control flow is not understood by analyzer"); + return false; + } + + // We only handle bottom-tested loops, i.e. loop in which the condition is + // checked at the end of each iteration. With that we can assume that all + // instructions in the loop are executed the same number of times. + if (TheLoop->getExitingBlock() != TheLoop->getLoopLatch()) { + emitAnalysis( + LoopAccessReport() << + "loop control flow is not understood by analyzer"); + return false; + } + + // We need to have a loop header. + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a loop: " << + TheLoop->getHeader()->getName() << '\n'); + + // ScalarEvolution needs to be able to find the exit count. + const SCEV *ExitCount = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(TheLoop); + if (ExitCount == SE->getCouldNotCompute()) { + emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport() << + "could not determine number of loop iterations"); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: SCEV could not compute the loop exit count.\n"); + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +void LoopAccessInfo::analyzeLoop(const ValueToValueMap &Strides) { + + typedef SmallVector<Value*, 16> ValueVector; + typedef SmallPtrSet<Value*, 16> ValueSet; + + // Holds the Load and Store *instructions*. + ValueVector Loads; + ValueVector Stores; + + // Holds all the different accesses in the loop. + unsigned NumReads = 0; + unsigned NumReadWrites = 0; + + PtrRtCheck.Pointers.clear(); + PtrRtCheck.Need = false; + + const bool IsAnnotatedParallel = TheLoop->isAnnotatedParallel(); + MemoryDepChecker DepChecker(SE, DL, TheLoop); + + // For each block. + for (Loop::block_iterator bb = TheLoop->block_begin(), + be = TheLoop->block_end(); bb != be; ++bb) { + + // Scan the BB and collect legal loads and stores. + for (BasicBlock::iterator it = (*bb)->begin(), e = (*bb)->end(); it != e; + ++it) { + + // If this is a load, save it. If this instruction can read from memory + // but is not a load, then we quit. Notice that we don't handle function + // calls that read or write. + if (it->mayReadFromMemory()) { + // Many math library functions read the rounding mode. We will only + // vectorize a loop if it contains known function calls that don't set + // the flag. Therefore, it is safe to ignore this read from memory. + CallInst *Call = dyn_cast<CallInst>(it); + if (Call && getIntrinsicIDForCall(Call, TLI)) + continue; + + LoadInst *Ld = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(it); + if (!Ld || (!Ld->isSimple() && !IsAnnotatedParallel)) { + emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport(Ld) + << "read with atomic ordering or volatile read"); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a non-simple load.\n"); + CanVecMem = false; + return; + } + NumLoads++; + Loads.push_back(Ld); + DepChecker.addAccess(Ld); + continue; + } + + // Save 'store' instructions. Abort if other instructions write to memory. + if (it->mayWriteToMemory()) { + StoreInst *St = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(it); + if (!St) { + emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport(it) << + "instruction cannot be vectorized"); + CanVecMem = false; + return; + } + if (!St->isSimple() && !IsAnnotatedParallel) { + emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport(St) + << "write with atomic ordering or volatile write"); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a non-simple store.\n"); + CanVecMem = false; + return; + } + NumStores++; + Stores.push_back(St); + DepChecker.addAccess(St); + } + } // Next instr. + } // Next block. + + // Now we have two lists that hold the loads and the stores. + // Next, we find the pointers that they use. + + // Check if we see any stores. If there are no stores, then we don't + // care if the pointers are *restrict*. + if (!Stores.size()) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a read-only loop!\n"); + CanVecMem = true; + return; + } + + AccessAnalysis::DepCandidates DependentAccesses; + AccessAnalysis Accesses(DL, AA, DependentAccesses); + + // Holds the analyzed pointers. We don't want to call GetUnderlyingObjects + // multiple times on the same object. If the ptr is accessed twice, once + // for read and once for write, it will only appear once (on the write + // list). This is okay, since we are going to check for conflicts between + // writes and between reads and writes, but not between reads and reads. + ValueSet Seen; + + ValueVector::iterator I, IE; + for (I = Stores.begin(), IE = Stores.end(); I != IE; ++I) { + StoreInst *ST = cast<StoreInst>(*I); + Value* Ptr = ST->getPointerOperand(); + + if (isUniform(Ptr)) { + emitAnalysis( + LoopAccessReport(ST) + << "write to a loop invariant address could not be vectorized"); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: We don't allow storing to uniform addresses\n"); + CanVecMem = false; + return; + } + + // If we did *not* see this pointer before, insert it to the read-write + // list. At this phase it is only a 'write' list. + if (Seen.insert(Ptr).second) { + ++NumReadWrites; + + AliasAnalysis::Location Loc = AA->getLocation(ST); + // The TBAA metadata could have a control dependency on the predication + // condition, so we cannot rely on it when determining whether or not we + // need runtime pointer checks. + if (blockNeedsPredication(ST->getParent(), TheLoop, DT)) + Loc.AATags.TBAA = nullptr; + + Accesses.addStore(Loc); + } + } + + if (IsAnnotatedParallel) { + DEBUG(dbgs() + << "LAA: A loop annotated parallel, ignore memory dependency " + << "checks.\n"); + CanVecMem = true; + return; + } + + for (I = Loads.begin(), IE = Loads.end(); I != IE; ++I) { + LoadInst *LD = cast<LoadInst>(*I); + Value* Ptr = LD->getPointerOperand(); + // If we did *not* see this pointer before, insert it to the + // read list. If we *did* see it before, then it is already in + // the read-write list. This allows us to vectorize expressions + // such as A[i] += x; Because the address of A[i] is a read-write + // pointer. This only works if the index of A[i] is consecutive. + // If the address of i is unknown (for example A[B[i]]) then we may + // read a few words, modify, and write a few words, and some of the + // words may be written to the same address. + bool IsReadOnlyPtr = false; + if (Seen.insert(Ptr).second || + !isStridedPtr(SE, DL, Ptr, TheLoop, Strides)) { + ++NumReads; + IsReadOnlyPtr = true; + } + + AliasAnalysis::Location Loc = AA->getLocation(LD); + // The TBAA metadata could have a control dependency on the predication + // condition, so we cannot rely on it when determining whether or not we + // need runtime pointer checks. + if (blockNeedsPredication(LD->getParent(), TheLoop, DT)) + Loc.AATags.TBAA = nullptr; + + Accesses.addLoad(Loc, IsReadOnlyPtr); + } + + // If we write (or read-write) to a single destination and there are no + // other reads in this loop then is it safe to vectorize. + if (NumReadWrites == 1 && NumReads == 0) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Found a write-only loop!\n"); + CanVecMem = true; + return; + } + + // Build dependence sets and check whether we need a runtime pointer bounds + // check. + Accesses.buildDependenceSets(); + bool NeedRTCheck = Accesses.isRTCheckNeeded(); + + // Find pointers with computable bounds. We are going to use this information + // to place a runtime bound check. + unsigned NumComparisons = 0; + bool CanDoRT = false; + if (NeedRTCheck) + CanDoRT = Accesses.canCheckPtrAtRT(PtrRtCheck, NumComparisons, SE, TheLoop, + Strides); + + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: We need to do " << NumComparisons << + " pointer comparisons.\n"); + + // If we only have one set of dependences to check pointers among we don't + // need a runtime check. + if (NumComparisons == 0 && NeedRTCheck) + NeedRTCheck = false; + + // Check that we did not collect too many pointers or found an unsizeable + // pointer. + if (!CanDoRT || NumComparisons > RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold) { + PtrRtCheck.reset(); + CanDoRT = false; + } + + if (CanDoRT) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: We can perform a memory runtime check if needed.\n"); + } + + if (NeedRTCheck && !CanDoRT) { + emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport() << "cannot identify array bounds"); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: We can't vectorize because we can't find " << + "the array bounds.\n"); + PtrRtCheck.reset(); + CanVecMem = false; + return; + } + + PtrRtCheck.Need = NeedRTCheck; + + CanVecMem = true; + if (Accesses.isDependencyCheckNeeded()) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Checking memory dependencies\n"); + CanVecMem = DepChecker.areDepsSafe( + DependentAccesses, Accesses.getDependenciesToCheck(), Strides); + MaxSafeDepDistBytes = DepChecker.getMaxSafeDepDistBytes(); + + if (!CanVecMem && DepChecker.shouldRetryWithRuntimeCheck()) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Retrying with memory checks\n"); + NeedRTCheck = true; + + // Clear the dependency checks. We assume they are not needed. + Accesses.resetDepChecks(); + + PtrRtCheck.reset(); + PtrRtCheck.Need = true; + + CanDoRT = Accesses.canCheckPtrAtRT(PtrRtCheck, NumComparisons, SE, + TheLoop, Strides, true); + // Check that we did not collect too many pointers or found an unsizeable + // pointer. + if (!CanDoRT || NumComparisons > RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold) { + if (!CanDoRT && NumComparisons > 0) + emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport() + << "cannot check memory dependencies at runtime"); + else + emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport() + << NumComparisons << " exceeds limit of " + << RuntimeMemoryCheckThreshold + << " dependent memory operations checked at runtime"); + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Can't vectorize with memory checks\n"); + PtrRtCheck.reset(); + CanVecMem = false; + return; + } + + CanVecMem = true; + } + } + + if (!CanVecMem) + emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport() << + "unsafe dependent memory operations in loop"); + + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: We" << (NeedRTCheck ? "" : " don't") << + " need a runtime memory check.\n"); +} + +bool LoopAccessInfo::blockNeedsPredication(BasicBlock *BB, Loop *TheLoop, + DominatorTree *DT) { + assert(TheLoop->contains(BB) && "Unknown block used"); + + // Blocks that do not dominate the latch need predication. + BasicBlock* Latch = TheLoop->getLoopLatch(); + return !DT->dominates(BB, Latch); +} + +void LoopAccessInfo::emitAnalysis(LoopAccessReport &Message) { + assert(!Report && "Multiple reports generated"); + Report = Message; +} + +bool LoopAccessInfo::isUniform(Value *V) const { + return (SE->isLoopInvariant(SE->getSCEV(V), TheLoop)); +} + +// FIXME: this function is currently a duplicate of the one in +// LoopVectorize.cpp. +static Instruction *getFirstInst(Instruction *FirstInst, Value *V, + Instruction *Loc) { + if (FirstInst) + return FirstInst; + if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V)) + return I->getParent() == Loc->getParent() ? I : nullptr; + return nullptr; +} + +std::pair<Instruction *, Instruction *> +LoopAccessInfo::addRuntimeCheck(Instruction *Loc) const { + Instruction *tnullptr = nullptr; + if (!PtrRtCheck.Need) + return std::pair<Instruction *, Instruction *>(tnullptr, tnullptr); + + unsigned NumPointers = PtrRtCheck.Pointers.size(); + SmallVector<TrackingVH<Value> , 2> Starts; + SmallVector<TrackingVH<Value> , 2> Ends; + + LLVMContext &Ctx = Loc->getContext(); + SCEVExpander Exp(*SE, "induction"); + Instruction *FirstInst = nullptr; + + for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumPointers; ++i) { + Value *Ptr = PtrRtCheck.Pointers[i]; + const SCEV *Sc = SE->getSCEV(Ptr); + + if (SE->isLoopInvariant(Sc, TheLoop)) { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Adding RT check for a loop invariant ptr:" << + *Ptr <<"\n"); + Starts.push_back(Ptr); + Ends.push_back(Ptr); + } else { + DEBUG(dbgs() << "LAA: Adding RT check for range:" << *Ptr << '\n'); + unsigned AS = Ptr->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(); + + // Use this type for pointer arithmetic. + Type *PtrArithTy = Type::getInt8PtrTy(Ctx, AS); + + Value *Start = Exp.expandCodeFor(PtrRtCheck.Starts[i], PtrArithTy, Loc); + Value *End = Exp.expandCodeFor(PtrRtCheck.Ends[i], PtrArithTy, Loc); + Starts.push_back(Start); + Ends.push_back(End); + } + } + + IRBuilder<> ChkBuilder(Loc); + // Our instructions might fold to a constant. + Value *MemoryRuntimeCheck = nullptr; + for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumPointers; ++i) { + for (unsigned j = i+1; j < NumPointers; ++j) { + if (!PtrRtCheck.needsChecking(i, j)) + continue; + + unsigned AS0 = Starts[i]->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(); + unsigned AS1 = Starts[j]->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace(); + + assert((AS0 == Ends[j]->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace()) && + (AS1 == Ends[i]->getType()->getPointerAddressSpace()) && + "Trying to bounds check pointers with different address spaces"); + + Type *PtrArithTy0 = Type::getInt8PtrTy(Ctx, AS0); + Type *PtrArithTy1 = Type::getInt8PtrTy(Ctx, AS1); + + Value *Start0 = ChkBuilder.CreateBitCast(Starts[i], PtrArithTy0, "bc"); + Value *Start1 = ChkBuilder.CreateBitCast(Starts[j], PtrArithTy1, "bc"); + Value *End0 = ChkBuilder.CreateBitCast(Ends[i], PtrArithTy1, "bc"); + Value *End1 = ChkBuilder.CreateBitCast(Ends[j], PtrArithTy0, "bc"); + + Value *Cmp0 = ChkBuilder.CreateICmpULE(Start0, End1, "bound0"); + FirstInst = getFirstInst(FirstInst, Cmp0, Loc); + Value *Cmp1 = ChkBuilder.CreateICmpULE(Start1, End0, "bound1"); + FirstInst = getFirstInst(FirstInst, Cmp1, Loc); + Value *IsConflict = ChkBuilder.CreateAnd(Cmp0, Cmp1, "found.conflict"); + FirstInst = getFirstInst(FirstInst, IsConflict, Loc); + if (MemoryRuntimeCheck) { + IsConflict = ChkBuilder.CreateOr(MemoryRuntimeCheck, IsConflict, + "conflict.rdx"); + FirstInst = getFirstInst(FirstInst, IsConflict, Loc); + } + MemoryRuntimeCheck = IsConflict; + } + } + + // We have to do this trickery because the IRBuilder might fold the check to a + // constant expression in which case there is no Instruction anchored in a + // the block. + Instruction *Check = BinaryOperator::CreateAnd(MemoryRuntimeCheck, + ConstantInt::getTrue(Ctx)); + ChkBuilder.Insert(Check, "memcheck.conflict"); + FirstInst = getFirstInst(FirstInst, Check, Loc); + return std::make_pair(FirstInst, Check); +} + +LoopAccessInfo::LoopAccessInfo(Loop *L, ScalarEvolution *SE, + const DataLayout *DL, + const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI, AliasAnalysis *AA, + DominatorTree *DT, + const ValueToValueMap &Strides) + : TheLoop(L), SE(SE), DL(DL), TLI(TLI), AA(AA), DT(DT), NumLoads(0), + NumStores(0), MaxSafeDepDistBytes(-1U), CanVecMem(false) { + if (canAnalyzeLoop()) + analyzeLoop(Strides); +} + +void LoopAccessInfo::print(raw_ostream &OS, unsigned Depth) const { + if (CanVecMem) { + if (PtrRtCheck.empty()) + OS.indent(Depth) << "Memory dependences are safe\n"; + else + OS.indent(Depth) << "Memory dependences are safe with run-time checks\n"; + } + + if (Report) + OS.indent(Depth) << "Report: " << Report->str() << "\n"; + + // FIXME: Print unsafe dependences + + // List the pair of accesses need run-time checks to prove independence. + PtrRtCheck.print(OS, Depth); + OS << "\n"; +} + +const LoopAccessInfo & +LoopAccessAnalysis::getInfo(Loop *L, const ValueToValueMap &Strides) { + auto &LAI = LoopAccessInfoMap[L]; + +#ifndef NDEBUG + assert((!LAI || LAI->NumSymbolicStrides == Strides.size()) && + "Symbolic strides changed for loop"); +#endif + + if (!LAI) { + LAI = llvm::make_unique<LoopAccessInfo>(L, SE, DL, TLI, AA, DT, Strides); +#ifndef NDEBUG + LAI->NumSymbolicStrides = Strides.size(); +#endif + } + return *LAI.get(); +} + +void LoopAccessAnalysis::print(raw_ostream &OS, const Module *M) const { + LoopAccessAnalysis &LAA = *const_cast<LoopAccessAnalysis *>(this); + + LoopInfo *LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfoWrapperPass>().getLoopInfo(); + ValueToValueMap NoSymbolicStrides; + + for (Loop *TopLevelLoop : *LI) + for (Loop *L : depth_first(TopLevelLoop)) { + OS.indent(2) << L->getHeader()->getName() << ":\n"; + auto &LAI = LAA.getInfo(L, NoSymbolicStrides); + LAI.print(OS, 4); + } +} + +bool LoopAccessAnalysis::runOnFunction(Function &F) { + SE = &getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>(); + DL = F.getParent()->getDataLayout(); + auto *TLIP = getAnalysisIfAvailable<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>(); + TLI = TLIP ? &TLIP->getTLI() : nullptr; + AA = &getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>(); + DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>().getDomTree(); + + return false; +} + +void LoopAccessAnalysis::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { + AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolution>(); + AU.addRequired<AliasAnalysis>(); + AU.addRequired<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>(); + AU.addRequired<LoopInfoWrapperPass>(); + + AU.setPreservesAll(); +} + +char LoopAccessAnalysis::ID = 0; +static const char laa_name[] = "Loop Access Analysis"; +#define LAA_NAME "loop-accesses" + +INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(LoopAccessAnalysis, LAA_NAME, laa_name, false, true) +INITIALIZE_AG_DEPENDENCY(AliasAnalysis) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(ScalarEvolution) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(DominatorTreeWrapperPass) +INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(LoopInfoWrapperPass) +INITIALIZE_PASS_END(LoopAccessAnalysis, LAA_NAME, laa_name, false, true) + +namespace llvm { + Pass *createLAAPass() { + return new LoopAccessAnalysis(); + } +} |