aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/Target/Mips/MipsSEISelLowering.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/Target/Mips/MipsSEISelLowering.cpp')
-rw-r--r--lib/Target/Mips/MipsSEISelLowering.cpp87
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/lib/Target/Mips/MipsSEISelLowering.cpp b/lib/Target/Mips/MipsSEISelLowering.cpp
index 84db5ce..99c7019 100644
--- a/lib/Target/Mips/MipsSEISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/Mips/MipsSEISelLowering.cpp
@@ -827,6 +827,10 @@ MipsSETargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter(MachineInstr *MI,
return emitMSACBranchPseudo(MI, BB, Mips::BZ_D);
case Mips::SZ_V_PSEUDO:
return emitMSACBranchPseudo(MI, BB, Mips::BZ_V);
+ case Mips::COPY_FW_PSEUDO:
+ return emitCOPY_FW(MI, BB);
+ case Mips::COPY_FD_PSEUDO:
+ return emitCOPY_FD(MI, BB);
}
}
@@ -1662,10 +1666,19 @@ lowerEXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
SDLoc DL(Op);
EVT ResTy = Op->getValueType(0);
SDValue Op0 = Op->getOperand(0);
- SDValue Op1 = Op->getOperand(1);
- EVT EltTy = Op0->getValueType(0).getVectorElementType();
- return DAG.getNode(MipsISD::VEXTRACT_SEXT_ELT, DL, ResTy, Op0, Op1,
- DAG.getValueType(EltTy));
+ EVT VecTy = Op0->getValueType(0);
+
+ if (!VecTy.is128BitVector())
+ return SDValue();
+
+ if (ResTy.isInteger()) {
+ SDValue Op1 = Op->getOperand(1);
+ EVT EltTy = VecTy.getVectorElementType();
+ return DAG.getNode(MipsISD::VEXTRACT_SEXT_ELT, DL, ResTy, Op0, Op1,
+ DAG.getValueType(EltTy));
+ }
+
+ return Op;
}
static bool isConstantOrUndef(const SDValue Op) {
@@ -2236,3 +2249,69 @@ emitMSACBranchPseudo(MachineInstr *MI, MachineBasicBlock *BB,
MI->eraseFromParent(); // The pseudo instruction is gone now.
return Sink;
}
+
+// Emit the COPY_FW pseudo instruction.
+//
+// copy_fw_pseudo $fd, $ws, n
+// =>
+// copy_u_w $rt, $ws, $n
+// mtc1 $rt, $fd
+//
+// When n is zero, the equivalent operation can be performed with (potentially)
+// zero instructions due to register overlaps. This optimization is never valid
+// for lane 1 because it would require FR=0 mode which isn't supported by MSA.
+MachineBasicBlock * MipsSETargetLowering::
+emitCOPY_FW(MachineInstr *MI, MachineBasicBlock *BB) const{
+ const TargetInstrInfo *TII = getTargetMachine().getInstrInfo();
+ MachineRegisterInfo &RegInfo = BB->getParent()->getRegInfo();
+ DebugLoc DL = MI->getDebugLoc();
+ unsigned Fd = MI->getOperand(0).getReg();
+ unsigned Ws = MI->getOperand(1).getReg();
+ unsigned Lane = MI->getOperand(2).getImm();
+
+ if (Lane == 0)
+ BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII->get(Mips::COPY), Fd).addReg(Ws, 0, Mips::sub_lo);
+ else {
+ unsigned Wt = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(&Mips::MSA128WRegClass);
+
+ BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII->get(Mips::SPLATI_W), Wt).addReg(Ws).addImm(1);
+ BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII->get(Mips::COPY), Fd).addReg(Wt, 0, Mips::sub_lo);
+ }
+
+ MI->eraseFromParent(); // The pseudo instruction is gone now.
+ return BB;
+}
+
+// Emit the COPY_FD pseudo instruction.
+//
+// copy_fd_pseudo $fd, $ws, n
+// =>
+// splati.d $wt, $ws, $n
+// copy $fd, $wt:sub_64
+//
+// When n is zero, the equivalent operation can be performed with (potentially)
+// zero instructions due to register overlaps. This optimization is always
+// valid because FR=1 mode which is the only supported mode in MSA.
+MachineBasicBlock * MipsSETargetLowering::
+emitCOPY_FD(MachineInstr *MI, MachineBasicBlock *BB) const{
+ assert(Subtarget->isFP64bit());
+
+ const TargetInstrInfo *TII = getTargetMachine().getInstrInfo();
+ MachineRegisterInfo &RegInfo = BB->getParent()->getRegInfo();
+ unsigned Fd = MI->getOperand(0).getReg();
+ unsigned Ws = MI->getOperand(1).getReg();
+ unsigned Lane = MI->getOperand(2).getImm() * 2;
+ DebugLoc DL = MI->getDebugLoc();
+
+ if (Lane == 0)
+ BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII->get(Mips::COPY), Fd).addReg(Ws, 0, Mips::sub_64);
+ else {
+ unsigned Wt = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(&Mips::MSA128DRegClass);
+
+ BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII->get(Mips::SPLATI_D), Wt).addReg(Ws).addImm(1);
+ BuildMI(*BB, MI, DL, TII->get(Mips::COPY), Fd).addReg(Wt, 0, Mips::sub_64);
+ }
+
+ MI->eraseFromParent(); // The pseudo instruction is gone now.
+ return BB;
+}