i965: Rename intel_emit* to reflect their new location in brw_pipe_control

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_performance_monitor.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_performance_monitor.c
index 2c8cd49..0a12375 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_performance_monitor.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_performance_monitor.c
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ snapshot_statistics_registers(struct brw_context *brw,
    const int group = PIPELINE_STATS_COUNTERS;
    const int num_counters = ctx->PerfMonitor.Groups[group].NumCounters;
 
-   intel_batchbuffer_emit_mi_flush(brw);
+   brw_emit_mi_flush(brw);
 
    for (int i = 0; i < num_counters; i++) {
       if (BITSET_TEST(monitor->base.ActiveCounters[group], i)) {
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ stop_oa_counters(struct brw_context *brw)
  * The amount of batch space it takes to emit an MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT snapshot,
  * including the required PIPE_CONTROL flushes.
  *
- * Sandybridge is the worst case scenario: intel_batchbuffer_emit_mi_flush
+ * Sandybridge is the worst case scenario: brw_emit_mi_flush
  * expands to three PIPE_CONTROLs which are 4 DWords each.  We have to flush
  * before and after MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT, so multiply by two.  Finally, add
  * the 3 DWords for MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT itself.
@@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ emit_mi_report_perf_count(struct brw_context *brw,
    int batch_used = brw->batch.used;
 
    /* Reports apparently don't always get written unless we flush first. */
-   intel_batchbuffer_emit_mi_flush(brw);
+   brw_emit_mi_flush(brw);
 
    if (brw->gen == 5) {
       /* Ironlake requires two MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT commands to write all
@@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ emit_mi_report_perf_count(struct brw_context *brw,
    }
 
    /* Reports apparently don't always get written unless we flush after. */
-   intel_batchbuffer_emit_mi_flush(brw);
+   brw_emit_mi_flush(brw);
 
    (void) batch_used;
    assert(brw->batch.used - batch_used <= MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT_BATCH_DWORDS * 4);