diff options
| author | Chris Craik <ccraik@google.com> | 2012-05-25 15:02:45 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris Craik <ccraik@google.com> | 2012-05-25 15:02:45 -0700 |
| commit | 41a420aa58df2d7ae8c7f491e7ec4c3edc8a1ecb (patch) | |
| tree | 435c6cd4b0d6330fadfed5e01297d4648f205ec5 /Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/android/rendering/SurfaceBacking.cpp | |
| parent | 385ef015bf9d84a940d65586b9f70292f6b6fb63 (diff) | |
| download | external_webkit-41a420aa58df2d7ae8c7f491e7ec4c3edc8a1ecb.zip external_webkit-41a420aa58df2d7ae8c7f491e7ec4c3edc8a1ecb.tar.gz external_webkit-41a420aa58df2d7ae8c7f491e7ec4c3edc8a1ecb.tar.bz2 | |
Use newest available SurfaceBacking scale when counting texture usage
Using m_scale would mean that while zooming out, the clipped area would get
larger, but the scale would stay the same.
bug:6561401
Change-Id: I0806ecb8f565c4d227a2be2b7a27a0af6aff7b46
Diffstat (limited to 'Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/android/rendering/SurfaceBacking.cpp')
| -rw-r--r-- | Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/android/rendering/SurfaceBacking.cpp | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/android/rendering/SurfaceBacking.cpp b/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/android/rendering/SurfaceBacking.cpp index 6d26aa8..d7f6535 100644 --- a/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/android/rendering/SurfaceBacking.cpp +++ b/Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/android/rendering/SurfaceBacking.cpp @@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ void SurfaceBacking::computeTexturesAmount(TexturesResult* result, // - textures needed for a clipped area // - textures needed for an un-clipped area TileGrid* tileGrid = m_zooming ? m_backTileGrid : m_frontTileGrid; - int nbTexturesUnclipped = tileGrid->nbTextures(fullContentArea, m_scale); - int nbTexturesClipped = tileGrid->nbTextures(visibleContentArea, m_scale); + int nbTexturesUnclipped = tileGrid->nbTextures(fullContentArea, m_futureScale); + int nbTexturesClipped = tileGrid->nbTextures(visibleContentArea, m_futureScale); if (layer) { // TODO: should handle multi-layer case better |