1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
<!--
4XPath Performance test from "Olivier Deckmyn" <odeckmyn.list@teaser.fr>, with import and filename updates
Subject: [4suite] 4XPath performance ?
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 16:30:21 +0200
From: "Olivier Deckmyn" <odeckmyn.list@teaser.fr>
To: "4Suite list" <4suite@dollar.fourthought.com>
I am playing and testing 4XPath....
And I am a little afraid of the results I see...
The machine is a Dell Server (2400) with a single PIII-750 and 256MB RAM,
USCSI disks (10K RPM), running FreeBSD4.
There is a lot of memory, cpu is not used for anything else than the test...
With a 100KB xml file, I have applied the attached test1.py
Here are the results :
QUERY="//author" (no match in the file)
Reading document
took 1.336457 sec
Starting query
took 307.572385 sec
Indexing DOM
took 0.125362 sec
Starting query
took 84.692544 sec
QUERY="//date" (few matches in the file)
Reading document
took 1.341848 sec
Starting query
took 308.466919 sec
<date> 10 October 1996</date><date>1 August 1996</date><date>17 April
1996</date><date> 17 April 1996</date><date> 17 April 1996</date><date> 12
April 1996</date><date>27 March 1996</date><date>27 March
1996</date><date>23 February 1996</date><date>9 December 1996</date><date>
29 November 1996</date><date> 31 October 1996</date>Indexing DOM
took 0.128668 sec
Starting query
took 85.145023 sec
<date> 10 October 1996</date><date>1 August 1996</date><date>17 April
1996</date><date> 17 April 1996</date><date> 17 April 1996</date><date> 12
April 1996</date><date>27 March 1996</date><date>27 March
1996</date><date>23 February 1996</date><date>9 December 1996</date><date>
29 November 1996</date><date> 31 October 1996</date>
Result :
Indexing is worth the price ! Very quick index build, and 3.5x speed gain
...
But, it very slow anyway :(
Is this the "normal" performance ? Can I do better?
-->
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../../../js/resources/js-test-style.css">
<script src="../../../js/resources/js-test-pre.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
<div id="console"></div>
<script>
req = new XMLHttpRequest;
req.open("GET", 'resources/od_20000608.xml', false);
req.send(null);
xml_dom_object = req.responseXML;
EXPR = '//author'
nodeset = xml_dom_object.evaluate(EXPR, xml_dom_object, null, XPathResult.UNORDERED_NODE_SNAPSHOT_TYPE, null);
shouldBe('nodeset.snapshotLength', '0')
EXPR = '//date'
nodeset = xml_dom_object.evaluate(EXPR, xml_dom_object, null, XPathResult.UNORDERED_NODE_SNAPSHOT_TYPE, null);
shouldBe('nodeset.snapshotLength', '12')
var successfullyParsed = true;
</script>
<script src="../../../js/resources/js-test-post.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
|
