diff options
author | Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> | 2006-01-06 00:19:01 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org> | 2006-01-06 08:33:47 -0800 |
commit | e464bf2bed027ea185992b44bf4b0326387a520d (patch) | |
tree | 1038935546cbf91640835d7b868067c60a95b33f /arch/um/drivers/line.c | |
parent | 7eebe8a9c51686927709a57b1f2725d371014abc (diff) | |
download | kernel_goldelico_gta04-e464bf2bed027ea185992b44bf4b0326387a520d.zip kernel_goldelico_gta04-e464bf2bed027ea185992b44bf4b0326387a520d.tar.gz kernel_goldelico_gta04-e464bf2bed027ea185992b44bf4b0326387a520d.tar.bz2 |
[PATCH] uml: SIGWINCH handling cleanup
Code cleanup - unregister_winch and winch_cleanup had some duplicate code.
This is now abstracted out into free_winch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/um/drivers/line.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/um/drivers/line.c | 54 |
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c index a3c3937..46ceb25 100644 --- a/arch/um/drivers/line.c +++ b/arch/um/drivers/line.c @@ -774,55 +774,49 @@ void register_winch_irq(int fd, int tty_fd, int pid, struct tty_struct *tty) printk("register_winch_irq - failed to register IRQ\n"); } +static void free_winch(struct winch *winch) +{ + list_del(&winch->list); + + if(winch->pid != -1) + os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1); + if(winch->fd != -1) + os_close_file(winch->fd); + + free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch); + kfree(winch); +} + static void unregister_winch(struct tty_struct *tty) { struct list_head *ele; - struct winch *winch, *found = NULL; + struct winch *winch; spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock); + list_for_each(ele, &winch_handlers){ winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list); if(winch->tty == tty){ - found = winch; - break; + free_winch(winch); + break; } } - if(found == NULL) - goto err; - - list_del(&winch->list); - spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock); - - if(winch->pid != -1) - os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1); - - free_irq(WINCH_IRQ, winch); - kfree(winch); - - return; -err: spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock); } -/* XXX: No lock as it's an exitcall... is this valid? Depending on cleanup - * order... are we sure that nothing else is done on the list? */ static void winch_cleanup(void) { - struct list_head *ele; + struct list_head *ele, *next; struct winch *winch; - list_for_each(ele, &winch_handlers){ + spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock); + + list_for_each_safe(ele, next, &winch_handlers){ winch = list_entry(ele, struct winch, list); - if(winch->fd != -1){ - /* Why is this different from the above free_irq(), - * which deactivates SIGIO? This searches the FD - * somewhere else and removes it from the list... */ - deactivate_fd(winch->fd, WINCH_IRQ); - os_close_file(winch->fd); - } - if(winch->pid != -1) - os_kill_process(winch->pid, 1); + free_winch(winch); } + + spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock); } __uml_exitcall(winch_cleanup); |