diff options
| author | Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> | 2010-11-13 10:52:09 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2010-11-18 10:10:50 +0100 |
| commit | 9223081f54e3dc5045fe41a475165d9003c9a779 (patch) | |
| tree | 8990b8655c992ad2fd4819ebbecbe0a949f5488f /arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | |
| parent | 96e612ffc301372d3a3b94e2cb5d1e0c1c207dd1 (diff) | |
| download | kernel_goldelico_gta04-9223081f54e3dc5045fe41a475165d9003c9a779.zip kernel_goldelico_gta04-9223081f54e3dc5045fe41a475165d9003c9a779.tar.gz kernel_goldelico_gta04-9223081f54e3dc5045fe41a475165d9003c9a779.tar.bz2 | |
x86: Use online node real index in calulate_tbl_offset()
Found a NUMA system that doesn't have RAM installed at the first
socket which hangs while executing init scripts.
bisected it to:
| commit 932967202182743c01a2eee4bdfa2c42697bc586
| Author: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
| Date: Wed Oct 20 11:07:03 2010 +0800
|
| x86: Spread tlb flush vector between nodes
It turns out when first socket is not online it could have cpus on
node1 tlb_offset set to bigger than NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS.
That could affect systems like 4 sockets, but socket 2 doesn't
have installed, sockets 3 will get too big tlb_offset.
Need to use real online node idx.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <4CDEDE59.40603@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/mm/tlb.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c index 12cdbb1..6acc724 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask *cpumask, static void __cpuinit calculate_tlb_offset(void) { - int cpu, node, nr_node_vecs; + int cpu, node, nr_node_vecs, idx = 0; /* * we are changing tlb_vector_offset for each CPU in runtime, but this * will not cause inconsistency, as the write is atomic under X86. we @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void __cpuinit calculate_tlb_offset(void) nr_node_vecs = NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS/nr_online_nodes; for_each_online_node(node) { - int node_offset = (node % NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS) * + int node_offset = (idx % NUM_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTORS) * nr_node_vecs; int cpu_offset = 0; for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node)) { @@ -248,6 +248,7 @@ static void __cpuinit calculate_tlb_offset(void) cpu_offset++; cpu_offset = cpu_offset % nr_node_vecs; } + idx++; } } |