diff options
| author | Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> | 2013-05-03 02:15:52 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> | 2013-05-03 02:15:52 -0400 |
| commit | e30b5dca15dea86aa697f9d58ff646294fe80d3d (patch) | |
| tree | 549d1ff3f8e5ecb9675a2937113aa99e64ef3ea1 /fs/ext4/extents_status.c | |
| parent | 0d606e2c9fccdd4e67febf1e2da500e1bfe9e045 (diff) | |
| download | kernel_goldelico_gta04-e30b5dca15dea86aa697f9d58ff646294fe80d3d.zip kernel_goldelico_gta04-e30b5dca15dea86aa697f9d58ff646294fe80d3d.tar.gz kernel_goldelico_gta04-e30b5dca15dea86aa697f9d58ff646294fe80d3d.tar.bz2 | |
ext4: fix fio regression
We (Linux Kernel Performance project) found a regression introduced
by commit:
f7fec032aa ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree
The commit causes about 20% performance decrease in fio random write
test. Profiler shows that rb_next() uses a lot of CPU time. The call
stack is:
rb_next
ext4_es_find_delayed_extent
ext4_map_blocks
_ext4_get_block
ext4_get_block_write
__blockdev_direct_IO
ext4_direct_IO
generic_file_direct_write
__generic_file_aio_write
ext4_file_write
aio_rw_vect_retry
aio_run_iocb
do_io_submit
sys_io_submit
system_call_fastpath
io_submit
td_io_getevents
io_u_queued_complete
thread_main
main
__libc_start_main
The cause is that ext4_es_find_delayed_extent() doesn't have an
upper bound, it keeps searching until a delayed extent is found.
When there are a lots of non-delayed entries in the extent state
tree, ext4_es_find_delayed_extent() may uses a lot of CPU time.
Reported-by: LKP project <lkp@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ext4/extents_status.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 17 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c index fe3337a..e6941e6 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c @@ -232,14 +232,16 @@ static struct extent_status *__es_tree_search(struct rb_root *root, } /* - * ext4_es_find_delayed_extent: find the 1st delayed extent covering @es->lblk - * if it exists, otherwise, the next extent after @es->lblk. + * ext4_es_find_delayed_extent_range: find the 1st delayed extent covering + * @es->lblk if it exists, otherwise, the next extent after @es->lblk. * * @inode: the inode which owns delayed extents * @lblk: the offset where we start to search + * @end: the offset where we stop to search * @es: delayed extent that we found */ -void ext4_es_find_delayed_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, +void ext4_es_find_delayed_extent_range(struct inode *inode, + ext4_lblk_t lblk, ext4_lblk_t end, struct extent_status *es) { struct ext4_es_tree *tree = NULL; @@ -247,7 +249,8 @@ void ext4_es_find_delayed_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk, struct rb_node *node; BUG_ON(es == NULL); - trace_ext4_es_find_delayed_extent_enter(inode, lblk); + BUG_ON(end < lblk); + trace_ext4_es_find_delayed_extent_range_enter(inode, lblk); read_lock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_lock); tree = &EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_tree; @@ -270,6 +273,10 @@ out: if (es1 && !ext4_es_is_delayed(es1)) { while ((node = rb_next(&es1->rb_node)) != NULL) { es1 = rb_entry(node, struct extent_status, rb_node); + if (es1->es_lblk > end) { + es1 = NULL; + break; + } if (ext4_es_is_delayed(es1)) break; } @@ -285,7 +292,7 @@ out: read_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_lock); ext4_es_lru_add(inode); - trace_ext4_es_find_delayed_extent_exit(inode, es); + trace_ext4_es_find_delayed_extent_range_exit(inode, es); } static struct extent_status * |