diff options
author | Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com> | 2010-05-17 20:20:44 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> | 2010-05-18 16:41:34 -0700 |
commit | d9ef75221a6247b758e1d7e18edb661996e4b7cf (patch) | |
tree | a1a1355da23b7448afdc851f7a211f2b3492d6e5 /fs/ocfs2 | |
parent | d5a7df0649fa6a1e7800785d760e2c7d7a3204de (diff) | |
download | kernel_goldelico_gta04-d9ef75221a6247b758e1d7e18edb661996e4b7cf.zip kernel_goldelico_gta04-d9ef75221a6247b758e1d7e18edb661996e4b7cf.tar.gz kernel_goldelico_gta04-d9ef75221a6247b758e1d7e18edb661996e4b7cf.tar.bz2 |
ocfs2:dlm: avoid dlm->ast_lock lockres->spinlock dependency break
Currently we process a dirty lockres with the lockres->spinlock taken. While
during the process, we may need to lock on dlm->ast_lock. This breaks the
dependency of dlm->ast_lock(lock first) and lockres->spinlock(lock second).
This patch fixes the problem.
Since we can't release lockres->spinlock, we have to take dlm->ast_lock
just before taking the lockres->spinlock and release it after lockres->spinlock
is released. And use __dlm_queue_bast()/__dlm_queue_ast(), the nolock version,
in dlm_shuffle_lists(). There are no too many locks on a lockres, so there is no
performance harm.
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ocfs2')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c | 16 |
3 files changed, 14 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c index 390a887..7ec61d9 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int dlm_should_cancel_bast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock *lock) return 0; } -static void __dlm_queue_ast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock *lock) +void __dlm_queue_ast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock *lock) { mlog_entry_void(); @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ void dlm_queue_ast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock *lock) } -static void __dlm_queue_bast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock *lock) +void __dlm_queue_bast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock *lock) { mlog_entry_void(); diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h index 4011568..4b6ae2c 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmcommon.h @@ -904,6 +904,8 @@ void __dlm_lockres_grab_inflight_ref(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, void dlm_queue_ast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock *lock); void dlm_queue_bast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock *lock); +void __dlm_queue_ast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock *lock); +void __dlm_queue_bast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock *lock); void dlm_do_local_ast(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock_resource *res, struct dlm_lock *lock); diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c index 52ec020..0bdd28e 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmthread.c @@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ static void dlm_shuffle_lists(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, * spinlock, and because we know that it is not migrating/ * recovering/in-progress, it is fine to reserve asts and * basts right before queueing them all throughout */ + assert_spin_locked(&dlm->ast_lock); assert_spin_locked(&res->spinlock); BUG_ON((res->state & (DLM_LOCK_RES_MIGRATING| DLM_LOCK_RES_RECOVERING| @@ -338,7 +339,7 @@ converting: /* queue the BAST if not already */ if (lock->ml.highest_blocked == LKM_IVMODE) { __dlm_lockres_reserve_ast(res); - dlm_queue_bast(dlm, lock); + __dlm_queue_bast(dlm, lock); } /* update the highest_blocked if needed */ if (lock->ml.highest_blocked < target->ml.convert_type) @@ -356,7 +357,7 @@ converting: can_grant = 0; if (lock->ml.highest_blocked == LKM_IVMODE) { __dlm_lockres_reserve_ast(res); - dlm_queue_bast(dlm, lock); + __dlm_queue_bast(dlm, lock); } if (lock->ml.highest_blocked < target->ml.convert_type) lock->ml.highest_blocked = @@ -384,7 +385,7 @@ converting: spin_unlock(&target->spinlock); __dlm_lockres_reserve_ast(res); - dlm_queue_ast(dlm, target); + __dlm_queue_ast(dlm, target); /* go back and check for more */ goto converting; } @@ -403,7 +404,7 @@ blocked: can_grant = 0; if (lock->ml.highest_blocked == LKM_IVMODE) { __dlm_lockres_reserve_ast(res); - dlm_queue_bast(dlm, lock); + __dlm_queue_bast(dlm, lock); } if (lock->ml.highest_blocked < target->ml.type) lock->ml.highest_blocked = target->ml.type; @@ -419,7 +420,7 @@ blocked: can_grant = 0; if (lock->ml.highest_blocked == LKM_IVMODE) { __dlm_lockres_reserve_ast(res); - dlm_queue_bast(dlm, lock); + __dlm_queue_bast(dlm, lock); } if (lock->ml.highest_blocked < target->ml.type) lock->ml.highest_blocked = target->ml.type; @@ -445,7 +446,7 @@ blocked: spin_unlock(&target->spinlock); __dlm_lockres_reserve_ast(res); - dlm_queue_ast(dlm, target); + __dlm_queue_ast(dlm, target); /* go back and check for more */ goto converting; } @@ -675,6 +676,7 @@ static int dlm_thread(void *data) /* lockres can be re-dirtied/re-added to the * dirty_list in this gap, but that is ok */ + spin_lock(&dlm->ast_lock); spin_lock(&res->spinlock); if (res->owner != dlm->node_num) { __dlm_print_one_lock_resource(res); @@ -695,6 +697,7 @@ static int dlm_thread(void *data) /* move it to the tail and keep going */ res->state &= ~DLM_LOCK_RES_DIRTY; spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); + spin_unlock(&dlm->ast_lock); mlog(0, "delaying list shuffling for in-" "progress lockres %.*s, state=%d\n", res->lockname.len, res->lockname.name, @@ -716,6 +719,7 @@ static int dlm_thread(void *data) dlm_shuffle_lists(dlm, res); res->state &= ~DLM_LOCK_RES_DIRTY; spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); + spin_unlock(&dlm->ast_lock); dlm_lockres_calc_usage(dlm, res); |