diff options
| author | Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> | 2012-01-05 20:16:39 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2012-01-07 10:16:34 -0800 |
| commit | f3f511e1ce6f1a6f0a5bb8320e9f802e76f6b999 (patch) | |
| tree | bedb8b38bec1bdb3fa7159bc61822488984d3ce0 /mm | |
| parent | 356b95424cfb456e14a59eaa579422ce014c424b (diff) | |
| download | kernel_goldelico_gta04-f3f511e1ce6f1a6f0a5bb8320e9f802e76f6b999.zip kernel_goldelico_gta04-f3f511e1ce6f1a6f0a5bb8320e9f802e76f6b999.tar.gz kernel_goldelico_gta04-f3f511e1ce6f1a6f0a5bb8320e9f802e76f6b999.tar.bz2 | |
net: fix sock_clone reference mismatch with tcp memcontrol
Sockets can also be created through sock_clone. Because it copies
all data in the sock structure, it also copies the memcg-related pointer,
and all should be fine. However, since we now use reference counts in
socket creation, we are left with some sockets that have no reference
counts. It matters when we destroy them, since it leads to a mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
CC: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
CC: Laurent Chavey <chavey@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 19 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index 94da8ee..9c72d5d 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -381,16 +381,25 @@ static void mem_cgroup_put(struct mem_cgroup *memcg); static bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *memcg); void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk) { - /* A socket spends its whole life in the same cgroup */ - if (sk->sk_cgrp) { - WARN_ON(1); - return; - } if (static_branch(&memcg_socket_limit_enabled)) { struct mem_cgroup *memcg; BUG_ON(!sk->sk_prot->proto_cgroup); + /* Socket cloning can throw us here with sk_cgrp already + * filled. It won't however, necessarily happen from + * process context. So the test for root memcg given + * the current task's memcg won't help us in this case. + * + * Respecting the original socket's memcg is a better + * decision in this case. + */ + if (sk->sk_cgrp) { + BUG_ON(mem_cgroup_is_root(sk->sk_cgrp->memcg)); + mem_cgroup_get(sk->sk_cgrp->memcg); + return; + } + rcu_read_lock(); memcg = mem_cgroup_from_task(current); if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) { |