diff options
| author | Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> | 2010-07-30 23:56:39 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2010-08-01 00:32:12 -0700 |
| commit | e2e0c7c9ddbe6b79fe647aca5eea3a405d38ada4 (patch) | |
| tree | 2caf75dd8e741a2df698a1491d15414e11598960 /net/rose | |
| parent | 0fc48c37ff3969dde71a43fa7c8f176d4bd90a3e (diff) | |
| download | kernel_goldelico_gta04-e2e0c7c9ddbe6b79fe647aca5eea3a405d38ada4.zip kernel_goldelico_gta04-e2e0c7c9ddbe6b79fe647aca5eea3a405d38ada4.tar.gz kernel_goldelico_gta04-e2e0c7c9ddbe6b79fe647aca5eea3a405d38ada4.tar.bz2 | |
net/rose: Use GFP_ATOMIC
The other calls to kmalloc in the same function use GFP_ATOMIC, and indeed
two locks are held within the body of the function.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@ identifier f; @@
*f(...,GFP_ATOMIC,...)
... when != spin_unlock(...)
when != read_unlock(...)
when != write_unlock(...)
when != read_unlock_irq(...)
when != write_unlock_irq(...)
when != read_unlock_irqrestore(...)
when != write_unlock_irqrestore(...)
when != spin_unlock_irq(...)
when != spin_unlock_irqrestore(...)
*f(...,GFP_KERNEL,...)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/rose')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/rose/rose_route.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c index cbc244a1..b4fdaac 100644 --- a/net/rose/rose_route.c +++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c @@ -109,7 +109,9 @@ static int __must_check rose_add_node(struct rose_route_struct *rose_route, init_timer(&rose_neigh->t0timer); if (rose_route->ndigis != 0) { - if ((rose_neigh->digipeat = kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_digi), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) { + rose_neigh->digipeat = + kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_digi), GFP_ATOMIC); + if (rose_neigh->digipeat == NULL) { kfree(rose_neigh); res = -ENOMEM; goto out; |