diff options
| author | Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com> | 2009-12-31 10:52:36 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> | 2010-01-06 17:38:04 -0500 |
| commit | b292cf9ce70d221c3f04ff62db5ab13d9a249ca8 (patch) | |
| tree | 00da53660b4b14d9310905d4cae9c63ec6588054 /net | |
| parent | 7211a4e859ad070b28545c06e0a6cb60b3b8aa31 (diff) | |
| download | kernel_goldelico_gta04-b292cf9ce70d221c3f04ff62db5ab13d9a249ca8.zip kernel_goldelico_gta04-b292cf9ce70d221c3f04ff62db5ab13d9a249ca8.tar.gz kernel_goldelico_gta04-b292cf9ce70d221c3f04ff62db5ab13d9a249ca8.tar.bz2 | |
sunrpc: fix peername failed on closed listener
There're some warnings of "nfsd: peername failed (err 107)!"
socket error -107 means Transport endpoint is not connected.
This warning message was outputed by svc_tcp_accept() [net/sunrpc/svcsock.c],
when kernel_getpeername returns -107. This means socket might be CLOSED.
And svc_tcp_accept was called by svc_recv() [net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c]
if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags)) {
<snip>
newxpt = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_accept(xprt);
<snip>
So this might happen when xprt->xpt_flags has both XPT_LISTENER and XPT_CLOSE.
Let's take a look at commit b0401d72, this commit has moved the close
processing after do recvfrom method, but this commit also introduces this
warnings, if the xpt_flags has both XPT_LISTENER and XPT_CLOSED, we should
close it, not accpet then close.
Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'net')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c index 2c58b75..810ffe8 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c @@ -699,7 +699,8 @@ int svc_recv(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, long timeout) spin_unlock_bh(&pool->sp_lock); len = 0; - if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags)) { + if (test_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &xprt->xpt_flags) && + !test_bit(XPT_CLOSE, &xprt->xpt_flags)) { struct svc_xprt *newxpt; newxpt = xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_accept(xprt); if (newxpt) { |