diff options
author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2013-09-11 14:19:38 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2013-09-11 15:56:19 -0700 |
commit | e79f525e99b04390ca4d2366309545a836c03bf1 (patch) | |
tree | 06fcca5d6cf0e093b7642f7192bfddc92baed108 /usr | |
parent | 3b8967d713d7426e9dd107d065208b84adface91 (diff) | |
download | kernel_goldelico_gta04-e79f525e99b04390ca4d2366309545a836c03bf1.zip kernel_goldelico_gta04-e79f525e99b04390ca4d2366309545a836c03bf1.tar.gz kernel_goldelico_gta04-e79f525e99b04390ca4d2366309545a836c03bf1.tar.bz2 |
pidns: fix vfork() after unshare(CLONE_NEWPID)
Commit 8382fcac1b81 ("pidns: Outlaw thread creation after
unshare(CLONE_NEWPID)") nacks CLONE_VM if the forking process unshared
pid_ns, this obviously breaks vfork:
int main(void)
{
assert(unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWPID) == 0);
assert(vfork() >= 0);
_exit(0);
return 0;
}
fails without this patch.
Change this check to use CLONE_SIGHAND instead. This also forbids
CLONE_THREAD automatically, and this is what the comment implies.
We could probably even drop CLONE_SIGHAND and use CLONE_THREAD, but it
would be safer to not do this. The current check denies CLONE_SIGHAND
implicitely and there is no reason to change this.
Eric said "CLONE_SIGHAND is fine. CLONE_THREAD would be even better.
Having shared signal handling between two different pid namespaces is
the case that we are fundamentally guarding against."
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Colin Walters <walters@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'usr')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions