diff options
author | Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> | 2010-06-19 17:05:36 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2010-06-25 21:33:12 -0700 |
commit | 01f2f3f6ef4d076c0c10a8a7b42624416d56b523 (patch) | |
tree | 188ee181f2fe21e42f402c4a955cb6ea2e70f118 | |
parent | bd97a63f7d9892b4536f331d263c2695cc52d08c (diff) | |
download | kernel_samsung_aries-01f2f3f6ef4d076c0c10a8a7b42624416d56b523.zip kernel_samsung_aries-01f2f3f6ef4d076c0c10a8a7b42624416d56b523.tar.gz kernel_samsung_aries-01f2f3f6ef4d076c0c10a8a7b42624416d56b523.tar.bz2 |
net: optimize Berkeley Packet Filter (BPF) processing
Gcc is currenlty not in the ability to optimize the switch statement in
sk_run_filter() because of dense case labels. This patch replace the
OR'd labels with ordered sequenced case labels. The sk_chk_filter()
function is modified to patch/replace the original OPCODES in a
ordered but equivalent form. gcc is now in the ability to transform the
switch statement in sk_run_filter into a jump table of complexity O(1).
Until this patch gcc generates a sequence of conditional branches (O(n) of 567
byte .text segment size (arch x86_64):
7ff: 8b 06 mov (%rsi),%eax
801: 66 83 f8 35 cmp $0x35,%ax
805: 0f 84 d0 02 00 00 je adb <sk_run_filter+0x31d>
80b: 0f 87 07 01 00 00 ja 918 <sk_run_filter+0x15a>
811: 66 83 f8 15 cmp $0x15,%ax
815: 0f 84 c5 02 00 00 je ae0 <sk_run_filter+0x322>
81b: 77 73 ja 890 <sk_run_filter+0xd2>
81d: 66 83 f8 04 cmp $0x4,%ax
821: 0f 84 17 02 00 00 je a3e <sk_run_filter+0x280>
827: 77 29 ja 852 <sk_run_filter+0x94>
829: 66 83 f8 01 cmp $0x1,%ax
[...]
With the modification the compiler translate the switch statement into
the following jump table fragment:
7ff: 66 83 3e 2c cmpw $0x2c,(%rsi)
803: 0f 87 1f 02 00 00 ja a28 <sk_run_filter+0x26a>
809: 0f b7 06 movzwl (%rsi),%eax
80c: ff 24 c5 00 00 00 00 jmpq *0x0(,%rax,8)
813: 44 89 e3 mov %r12d,%ebx
816: e9 43 03 00 00 jmpq b5e <sk_run_filter+0x3a0>
81b: 41 89 dc mov %ebx,%r12d
81e: e9 3b 03 00 00 jmpq b5e <sk_run_filter+0x3a0>
Furthermore, I reordered the instructions to reduce cache line misses by
order the most common instruction to the start.
Signed-off-by: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/filter.h | 48 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | net/core/filter.c | 212 |
2 files changed, 209 insertions, 51 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index 151f5d7..69b43db 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -91,6 +91,54 @@ struct sock_fprog { /* Required for SO_ATTACH_FILTER. */ #define BPF_TAX 0x00 #define BPF_TXA 0x80 +enum { + BPF_S_RET_K = 0, + BPF_S_RET_A, + BPF_S_ALU_ADD_K, + BPF_S_ALU_ADD_X, + BPF_S_ALU_SUB_K, + BPF_S_ALU_SUB_X, + BPF_S_ALU_MUL_K, + BPF_S_ALU_MUL_X, + BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X, + BPF_S_ALU_AND_K, + BPF_S_ALU_AND_X, + BPF_S_ALU_OR_K, + BPF_S_ALU_OR_X, + BPF_S_ALU_LSH_K, + BPF_S_ALU_LSH_X, + BPF_S_ALU_RSH_K, + BPF_S_ALU_RSH_X, + BPF_S_ALU_NEG, + BPF_S_LD_W_ABS, + BPF_S_LD_H_ABS, + BPF_S_LD_B_ABS, + BPF_S_LD_W_LEN, + BPF_S_LD_W_IND, + BPF_S_LD_H_IND, + BPF_S_LD_B_IND, + BPF_S_LD_IMM, + BPF_S_LDX_W_LEN, + BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH, + BPF_S_LDX_IMM, + BPF_S_MISC_TAX, + BPF_S_MISC_TXA, + BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K, + BPF_S_LD_MEM, + BPF_S_LDX_MEM, + BPF_S_ST, + BPF_S_STX, + BPF_S_JMP_JA, + BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_K, + BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_X, + BPF_S_JMP_JGE_K, + BPF_S_JMP_JGE_X, + BPF_S_JMP_JGT_K, + BPF_S_JMP_JGT_X, + BPF_S_JMP_JSET_K, + BPF_S_JMP_JSET_X, +}; + #ifndef BPF_MAXINSNS #define BPF_MAXINSNS 4096 #endif diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index da69fb7..52b051f 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c @@ -128,87 +128,87 @@ unsigned int sk_run_filter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock_filter *filter, int fentry = &filter[pc]; switch (fentry->code) { - case BPF_ALU|BPF_ADD|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_ALU_ADD_X: A += X; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_ADD|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_ALU_ADD_K: A += fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_SUB|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_ALU_SUB_X: A -= X; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_SUB|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_ALU_SUB_K: A -= fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_MUL|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_ALU_MUL_X: A *= X; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_MUL|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_ALU_MUL_K: A *= fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X: if (X == 0) return 0; A /= X; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K: A /= fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_AND|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_ALU_AND_X: A &= X; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_AND|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_ALU_AND_K: A &= fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_OR|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_ALU_OR_X: A |= X; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_OR|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_ALU_OR_K: A |= fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_LSH|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_ALU_LSH_X: A <<= X; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_LSH|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_ALU_LSH_K: A <<= fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_RSH|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_ALU_RSH_X: A >>= X; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_RSH|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_ALU_RSH_K: A >>= fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_ALU|BPF_NEG: + case BPF_S_ALU_NEG: A = -A; continue; - case BPF_JMP|BPF_JA: + case BPF_S_JMP_JA: pc += fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGT|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_JMP_JGT_K: pc += (A > fentry->k) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf; continue; - case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGE|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_JMP_JGE_K: pc += (A >= fentry->k) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf; continue; - case BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_K: pc += (A == fentry->k) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf; continue; - case BPF_JMP|BPF_JSET|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_JMP_JSET_K: pc += (A & fentry->k) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf; continue; - case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGT|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_JMP_JGT_X: pc += (A > X) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf; continue; - case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGE|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_JMP_JGE_X: pc += (A >= X) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf; continue; - case BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_X: pc += (A == X) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf; continue; - case BPF_JMP|BPF_JSET|BPF_X: + case BPF_S_JMP_JSET_X: pc += (A & X) ? fentry->jt : fentry->jf; continue; - case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS: + case BPF_S_LD_W_ABS: k = fentry->k; load_w: ptr = load_pointer(skb, k, 4, &tmp); @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ load_w: continue; } break; - case BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_ABS: + case BPF_S_LD_H_ABS: k = fentry->k; load_h: ptr = load_pointer(skb, k, 2, &tmp); @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ load_h: continue; } break; - case BPF_LD|BPF_B|BPF_ABS: + case BPF_S_LD_B_ABS: k = fentry->k; load_b: ptr = load_pointer(skb, k, 1, &tmp); @@ -235,54 +235,54 @@ load_b: continue; } break; - case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_LEN: + case BPF_S_LD_W_LEN: A = skb->len; continue; - case BPF_LDX|BPF_W|BPF_LEN: + case BPF_S_LDX_W_LEN: X = skb->len; continue; - case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_IND: + case BPF_S_LD_W_IND: k = X + fentry->k; goto load_w; - case BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_IND: + case BPF_S_LD_H_IND: k = X + fentry->k; goto load_h; - case BPF_LD|BPF_B|BPF_IND: + case BPF_S_LD_B_IND: k = X + fentry->k; goto load_b; - case BPF_LDX|BPF_B|BPF_MSH: + case BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH: ptr = load_pointer(skb, fentry->k, 1, &tmp); if (ptr != NULL) { X = (*(u8 *)ptr & 0xf) << 2; continue; } return 0; - case BPF_LD|BPF_IMM: + case BPF_S_LD_IMM: A = fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_LDX|BPF_IMM: + case BPF_S_LDX_IMM: X = fentry->k; continue; - case BPF_LD|BPF_MEM: + case BPF_S_LD_MEM: A = mem[fentry->k]; continue; - case BPF_LDX|BPF_MEM: + case BPF_S_LDX_MEM: X = mem[fentry->k]; continue; - case BPF_MISC|BPF_TAX: + case BPF_S_MISC_TAX: X = A; continue; - case BPF_MISC|BPF_TXA: + case BPF_S_MISC_TXA: A = X; continue; - case BPF_RET|BPF_K: + case BPF_S_RET_K: return fentry->k; - case BPF_RET|BPF_A: + case BPF_S_RET_A: return A; - case BPF_ST: + case BPF_S_ST: mem[fentry->k] = A; continue; - case BPF_STX: + case BPF_S_STX: mem[fentry->k] = X; continue; default: @@ -390,53 +390,128 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, int flen) /* Only allow valid instructions */ switch (ftest->code) { case BPF_ALU|BPF_ADD|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_ADD_K; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_ADD|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_ADD_X; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_SUB|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_SUB_K; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_SUB|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_SUB_X; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_MUL|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_MUL_K; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_MUL|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_MUL_X; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_DIV_X; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_AND|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_AND_K; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_AND|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_AND_X; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_OR|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_OR_K; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_OR|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_OR_X; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_LSH|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_LSH_K; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_LSH|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_LSH_X; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_RSH|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_RSH_K; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_RSH|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_RSH_X; + break; case BPF_ALU|BPF_NEG: + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_NEG; + break; case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_W_ABS; + break; case BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_ABS: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_H_ABS; + break; case BPF_LD|BPF_B|BPF_ABS: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_B_ABS; + break; case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_LEN: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_W_LEN; + break; case BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_IND: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_W_IND; + break; case BPF_LD|BPF_H|BPF_IND: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_H_IND; + break; case BPF_LD|BPF_B|BPF_IND: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_B_IND; + break; case BPF_LD|BPF_IMM: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_IMM; + break; case BPF_LDX|BPF_W|BPF_LEN: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LDX_W_LEN; + break; case BPF_LDX|BPF_B|BPF_MSH: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LDX_B_MSH; + break; case BPF_LDX|BPF_IMM: + ftest->code = BPF_S_LDX_IMM; + break; case BPF_MISC|BPF_TAX: + ftest->code = BPF_S_MISC_TAX; + break; case BPF_MISC|BPF_TXA: + ftest->code = BPF_S_MISC_TXA; + break; case BPF_RET|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_RET_K; + break; case BPF_RET|BPF_A: + ftest->code = BPF_S_RET_A; break; /* Some instructions need special checks */ - case BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_K: /* check for division by zero */ + case BPF_ALU|BPF_DIV|BPF_K: if (ftest->k == 0) return -EINVAL; + ftest->code = BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K; break; + /* check for invalid memory addresses */ case BPF_LD|BPF_MEM: + if (ftest->k >= BPF_MEMWORDS) + return -EINVAL; + ftest->code = BPF_S_LD_MEM; + break; case BPF_LDX|BPF_MEM: + if (ftest->k >= BPF_MEMWORDS) + return -EINVAL; + ftest->code = BPF_S_LDX_MEM; + break; case BPF_ST: + if (ftest->k >= BPF_MEMWORDS) + return -EINVAL; + ftest->code = BPF_S_ST; + break; case BPF_STX: - /* check for invalid memory addresses */ if (ftest->k >= BPF_MEMWORDS) return -EINVAL; + ftest->code = BPF_S_STX; break; case BPF_JMP|BPF_JA: @@ -447,28 +522,63 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, int flen) */ if (ftest->k >= (unsigned)(flen-pc-1)) return -EINVAL; + ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JA; break; case BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_K; + break; case BPF_JMP|BPF_JEQ|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_X; + break; case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGE|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JGE_K; + break; case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGE|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JGE_X; + break; case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGT|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JGT_K; + break; case BPF_JMP|BPF_JGT|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JGT_X; + break; case BPF_JMP|BPF_JSET|BPF_K: + ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JSET_K; + break; case BPF_JMP|BPF_JSET|BPF_X: + ftest->code = BPF_S_JMP_JSET_X; + break; + + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + /* for conditionals both must be safe */ + switch (ftest->code) { + case BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_K: + case BPF_S_JMP_JEQ_X: + case BPF_S_JMP_JGE_K: + case BPF_S_JMP_JGE_X: + case BPF_S_JMP_JGT_K: + case BPF_S_JMP_JGT_X: + case BPF_S_JMP_JSET_X: + case BPF_S_JMP_JSET_K: if (pc + ftest->jt + 1 >= flen || pc + ftest->jf + 1 >= flen) return -EINVAL; - break; + } + } + /* last instruction must be a RET code */ + switch (filter[flen - 1].code) { + case BPF_S_RET_K: + case BPF_S_RET_A: + return 0; + break; default: return -EINVAL; } - } - - return (BPF_CLASS(filter[flen - 1].code) == BPF_RET) ? 0 : -EINVAL; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(sk_chk_filter); |