diff options
| author | Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> | 2009-09-21 16:44:32 +1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> | 2009-09-21 09:28:40 +0200 |
| commit | cd74c86bdf705f824d494a2bbda393d1d562b40a (patch) | |
| tree | 8af5261bcd84014f6f587eb326b7dd7c203d0966 /arch | |
| parent | a1792cdacaf5180e04e07811e220c4a3b4a9c33e (diff) | |
| download | kernel_samsung_aries-cd74c86bdf705f824d494a2bbda393d1d562b40a.zip kernel_samsung_aries-cd74c86bdf705f824d494a2bbda393d1d562b40a.tar.gz kernel_samsung_aries-cd74c86bdf705f824d494a2bbda393d1d562b40a.tar.bz2 | |
perf_counter, powerpc, sparc: Fix compilation after perf_counter_overflow() change
Commit 5622f295 ("x86, perf_counter, bts: Optimize BTS overflow
handling") removed the regs field from struct perf_sample_data and
added a regs parameter to perf_counter_overflow(). This breaks the
build on powerpc (and Sparc) as reported by Sachin Sant:
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'record_and_restart':
arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c:1165: error: unknown field 'regs' specified in initializer
This adjusts arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c to correspond with the
new struct perf_sample_data and perf_counter_overflow().
[ v2: also fix Sparc, Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> ]
Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <19127.8400.376239.586120@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c | 3 |
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c index 7ceefaf..5ccf9bc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c @@ -1162,7 +1162,6 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val, */ if (record) { struct perf_sample_data data = { - .regs = regs, .addr = 0, .period = counter->hw.last_period, }; @@ -1170,7 +1169,7 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val, if (counter->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR) perf_get_data_addr(regs, &data.addr); - if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data)) { + if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data, regs)) { /* * Interrupts are coming too fast - throttle them * by setting the counter to 0, so it will be diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c index 09de4035..b1265ce 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c @@ -493,7 +493,6 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self, regs = args->regs; - data.regs = regs; data.addr = 0; cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_counters); @@ -513,7 +512,7 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self, if (!sparc_perf_counter_set_period(counter, hwc, idx)) continue; - if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data)) + if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data, regs)) sparc_pmu_disable_counter(hwc, idx); } |