diff options
| author | Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> | 2008-04-22 00:46:42 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2008-04-22 00:46:42 -0700 |
| commit | c5d18e984a313adf5a1a4ae69e0b1d93cf410229 (patch) | |
| tree | 2922514a388759b999757eec49b7a5bd9f290e3c /net/xfrm | |
| parent | 7c3f944e29c02d71e13442e977cf4cec19c39e98 (diff) | |
| download | kernel_samsung_aries-c5d18e984a313adf5a1a4ae69e0b1d93cf410229.zip kernel_samsung_aries-c5d18e984a313adf5a1a4ae69e0b1d93cf410229.tar.gz kernel_samsung_aries-c5d18e984a313adf5a1a4ae69e0b1d93cf410229.tar.bz2 | |
[IPSEC]: Fix catch-22 with algorithm IDs above 31
As it stands it's impossible to use any authentication algorithms
with an ID above 31 portably. It just happens to work on x86 but
fails miserably on ppc64.
The reason is that we're using a bit mask to check the algorithm
ID but the mask is only 32 bits wide.
After looking at how this is used in the field, I have concluded
that in the long term we should phase out state matching by IDs
because this is made superfluous by the reqid feature. For current
applications, the best solution IMHO is to allow all algorithms when
the bit masks are all ~0.
The following patch does exactly that.
This bug was identified by IBM when testing on the ppc64 platform
using the NULL authentication algorithm which has an ID of 251.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/xfrm')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 2 |
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c index ab4d0e5..e0c0390 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c @@ -1819,7 +1819,7 @@ xfrm_state_ok(struct xfrm_tmpl *tmpl, struct xfrm_state *x, (x->id.spi == tmpl->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi) && (x->props.reqid == tmpl->reqid || !tmpl->reqid) && x->props.mode == tmpl->mode && - ((tmpl->aalgos & (1<<x->props.aalgo)) || + (tmpl->allalgs || (tmpl->aalgos & (1<<x->props.aalgo)) || !(xfrm_id_proto_match(tmpl->id.proto, IPSEC_PROTO_ANY))) && !(x->props.mode != XFRM_MODE_TRANSPORT && xfrm_state_addr_cmp(tmpl, x, family)); diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c index 1810f56..22a30ae 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c @@ -981,6 +981,8 @@ static void copy_templates(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, t->aalgos = ut->aalgos; t->ealgos = ut->ealgos; t->calgos = ut->calgos; + /* If all masks are ~0, then we allow all algorithms. */ + t->allalgs = !~(t->aalgos & t->ealgos & t->calgos); t->encap_family = ut->family; } } |