[ARM] vfp: make fpexc bit names less verbose

Use the fpexc abbreviated names instead of long verbose names
for fpexc bits.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

2 files changed, 12 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
index d4b7b22..0ac022f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S
@@ -74,14 +74,14 @@ vfp_support_entry:
 
 	VFPFMRX	r1, FPEXC		@ Is the VFP enabled?
 	DBGSTR1	"fpexc %08x", r1
-	tst	r1, #FPEXC_ENABLE
+	tst	r1, #FPEXC_EN
 	bne	look_for_VFP_exceptions	@ VFP is already enabled
 
 	DBGSTR1 "enable %x", r10
 	ldr	r3, last_VFP_context_address
-	orr	r1, r1, #FPEXC_ENABLE	@ user FPEXC has the enable bit set
+	orr	r1, r1, #FPEXC_EN	@ user FPEXC has the enable bit set
 	ldr	r4, [r3, r11, lsl #2]	@ last_VFP_context pointer
-	bic	r5, r1, #FPEXC_EXCEPTION @ make sure exceptions are disabled
+	bic	r5, r1, #FPEXC_EX	@ make sure exceptions are disabled
 	cmp	r4, r10
 	beq	check_for_exception	@ we are returning to the same
 					@ process, so the registers are
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ no_old_VFP_process:
 	VFPFMXR	FPSCR, r5		@ restore status
 
 check_for_exception:
-	tst	r1, #FPEXC_EXCEPTION
+	tst	r1, #FPEXC_EX
 	bne	process_exception	@ might as well handle the pending
 					@ exception before retrying branch
 					@ out before setting an FPEXC that
@@ -136,10 +136,10 @@ check_for_exception:
 
 
 look_for_VFP_exceptions:
-	tst	r1, #FPEXC_EXCEPTION
+	tst	r1, #FPEXC_EX
 	bne	process_exception
 	VFPFMRX	r5, FPSCR
-	tst	r5, #FPSCR_IXE		@ IXE doesn't set FPEXC_EXCEPTION !
+	tst	r5, #FPSCR_IXE		@ IXE doesn't set FPEXC_EX !
 	bne	process_exception
 
 	@ Fall into hand on to next handler - appropriate coproc instr
diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
index 1106b5f..04ddab2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static int vfp_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *v)
 		 * case the thread migrates to a different CPU. The
 		 * restoring is done lazily.
 		 */
-		if ((fpexc & FPEXC_ENABLE) && last_VFP_context[cpu]) {
+		if ((fpexc & FPEXC_EN) && last_VFP_context[cpu]) {
 			vfp_save_state(last_VFP_context[cpu], fpexc);
 			last_VFP_context[cpu]->hard.cpu = cpu;
 		}
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int vfp_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *v)
 		 * Always disable VFP so we can lazily save/restore the
 		 * old state.
 		 */
-		fmxr(FPEXC, fpexc & ~FPEXC_ENABLE);
+		fmxr(FPEXC, fpexc & ~FPEXC_EN);
 		return NOTIFY_DONE;
 	}
 
@@ -81,13 +81,13 @@ static int vfp_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long cmd, void *v)
 		 */
 		memset(vfp, 0, sizeof(union vfp_state));
 
-		vfp->hard.fpexc = FPEXC_ENABLE;
+		vfp->hard.fpexc = FPEXC_EN;
 		vfp->hard.fpscr = FPSCR_ROUND_NEAREST;
 
 		/*
 		 * Disable VFP to ensure we initialise it first.
 		 */
-		fmxr(FPEXC, fmrx(FPEXC) & ~FPEXC_ENABLE);
+		fmxr(FPEXC, fmrx(FPEXC) & ~FPEXC_EN);
 	}
 
 	/* flush and release case: Per-thread VFP cleanup. */
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ void VFP9_bounce(u32 trigger, u32 fpexc, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	/*
 	 * Enable access to the VFP so we can handle the bounce.
 	 */
-	fmxr(FPEXC, fpexc & ~(FPEXC_EXCEPTION|FPEXC_INV|FPEXC_UFC|FPEXC_IOC));
+	fmxr(FPEXC, fpexc & ~(FPEXC_EX|FPEXC_INV|FPEXC_UFC|FPEXC_IOC));
 
 	orig_fpscr = fpscr = fmrx(FPSCR);
 
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ void VFP9_bounce(u32 trigger, u32 fpexc, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	/*
 	 * Modify fpscr to indicate the number of iterations remaining
 	 */
-	if (fpexc & FPEXC_EXCEPTION) {
+	if (fpexc & FPEXC_EX) {
 		u32 len;
 
 		len = fpexc + (1 << FPEXC_LENGTH_BIT);