diff options
author | Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> | 2010-08-25 13:39:17 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> | 2010-08-27 11:12:29 -0700 |
commit | 72d7c3b33c980843e756681fb4867dc1efd62a76 (patch) | |
tree | 9607345d9fa055dd501aacf0772258fb72897035 /arch/x86/mm | |
parent | 301ff3e88ef9ff4bdb92f36a3e6170fce4c9dd34 (diff) | |
download | kernel_samsung_crespo-72d7c3b33c980843e756681fb4867dc1efd62a76.zip kernel_samsung_crespo-72d7c3b33c980843e756681fb4867dc1efd62a76.tar.gz kernel_samsung_crespo-72d7c3b33c980843e756681fb4867dc1efd62a76.tar.bz2 |
x86: Use memblock to replace early_res
1. replace find_e820_area with memblock_find_in_range
2. replace reserve_early with memblock_x86_reserve_range
3. replace free_early with memblock_x86_free_range.
4. NO_BOOTMEM will switch to use memblock too.
5. use _e820, _early wrap in the patch, in following patch, will
replace them all
6. because memblock_x86_free_range support partial free, we can remove some special care
7. Need to make sure that memblock_find_in_range() is called after memblock_x86_fill()
so adjust some calling later in setup.c::setup_arch()
-- corruption_check and mptable_update
-v2: Move reserve_brk() early
Before fill_memblock_area, to avoid overlap between brk and memblock_find_in_range()
that could happen We have more then 128 RAM entry in E820 tables, and
memblock_x86_fill() could use memblock_find_in_range() to find a new place for
memblock.memory.region array.
and We don't need to use extend_brk() after fill_memblock_area()
So move reserve_brk() early before fill_memblock_area().
-v3: Move find_smp_config early
To make sure memblock_find_in_range not find wrong place, if BIOS doesn't put mptable
in right place.
-v4: Treat RESERVED_KERN as RAM in memblock.memory. and they are already in
memblock.reserved already..
use __NOT_KEEP_MEMBLOCK to make sure memblock related code could be freed later.
-v5: Generic version __memblock_find_in_range() is going from high to low, and for 32bit
active_region for 32bit does include high pages
need to replace the limit with memblock.default_alloc_limit, aka get_max_mapped()
-v6: Use current_limit instead
-v7: check with MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1L
-v8: Set memblock_can_resize early to handle EFI with more RAM entries
-v9: update after kmemleak changes in mainline
Suggested-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Suggested-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/mm')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c index a7bcc23..3d54f9f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include <linux/string.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/bootmem.h> +#include <linux/memblock.h> #include <linux/mmzone.h> #include <linux/ctype.h> #include <linux/module.h> @@ -171,8 +172,8 @@ static void * __init early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, if (start < (MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT) && end > (MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT)) start = MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT; - mem = find_e820_area(start, end, size, align); - if (mem != -1L) + mem = memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(nodeid, start, end, size, align); + if (mem != MEMBLOCK_ERROR) return __va(mem); /* extend the search scope */ @@ -181,8 +182,8 @@ static void * __init early_node_mem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, start = MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT; else start = MAX_DMA_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT; - mem = find_e820_area(start, end, size, align); - if (mem != -1L) + mem = memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(nodeid, start, end, size, align); + if (mem != MEMBLOCK_ERROR) return __va(mem); printk(KERN_ERR "Cannot find %lu bytes in node %d\n", |