diff options
| author | Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> | 2008-04-11 15:01:22 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com> | 2008-04-27 18:21:32 +0300 |
| commit | e9571ed54b2a290d61b98ad6f369f963159fe6da (patch) | |
| tree | 8767ba834196c08da817e545542ff5a681df96e8 /arch | |
| parent | 62d9f0dbc92d7e398fde53fc6021338393522e68 (diff) | |
| download | kernel_samsung_crespo-e9571ed54b2a290d61b98ad6f369f963159fe6da.zip kernel_samsung_crespo-e9571ed54b2a290d61b98ad6f369f963159fe6da.tar.gz kernel_samsung_crespo-e9571ed54b2a290d61b98ad6f369f963159fe6da.tar.bz2 | |
KVM: fix kvm_vcpu_kick vs __vcpu_run race
There is a window open between testing of pending IRQ's
and assignment of guest_mode in __vcpu_run.
Injection of IRQ's can race with __vcpu_run as follows:
CPU0 CPU1
kvm_x86_ops->run()
vcpu->guest_mode = 0 SET_IRQ_LINE ioctl
..
kvm_x86_ops->inject_pending_irq
kvm_cpu_has_interrupt()
apic_test_and_set_irr()
kvm_vcpu_kick
if (vcpu->guest_mode)
send_ipi()
vcpu->guest_mode = 1
So move guest_mode=1 assignment before ->inject_pending_irq, and make
sure that it won't reorder after it.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 5c3c9d3..0ce5563 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -2802,6 +2802,13 @@ again: goto out; } + vcpu->guest_mode = 1; + /* + * Make sure that guest_mode assignment won't happen after + * testing the pending IRQ vector bitmap. + */ + smp_wmb(); + if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending) __queue_exception(vcpu); else if (irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) @@ -2813,7 +2820,6 @@ again: up_read(&vcpu->kvm->slots_lock); - vcpu->guest_mode = 1; kvm_guest_enter(); if (vcpu->requests) @@ -3970,11 +3976,17 @@ static void vcpu_kick_intr(void *info) void kvm_vcpu_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { int ipi_pcpu = vcpu->cpu; + int cpu = get_cpu(); if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq)) { wake_up_interruptible(&vcpu->wq); ++vcpu->stat.halt_wakeup; } - if (vcpu->guest_mode) + /* + * We may be called synchronously with irqs disabled in guest mode, + * So need not to call smp_call_function_single() in that case. + */ + if (vcpu->guest_mode && vcpu->cpu != cpu) smp_call_function_single(ipi_pcpu, vcpu_kick_intr, vcpu, 0, 0); + put_cpu(); } |