diff options
author | Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> | 2005-06-28 20:44:54 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org> | 2005-06-28 21:20:31 -0700 |
commit | 05133fc498e788e1c1ca4e906f9e05d9779fd63b (patch) | |
tree | bb9e20a71f4f7062eec60ec8301acff6697aa204 /include/linux/byteorder | |
parent | b79646e3dd51b389b2a570b454f8e2fb7a613e37 (diff) | |
download | kernel_samsung_crespo-05133fc498e788e1c1ca4e906f9e05d9779fd63b.zip kernel_samsung_crespo-05133fc498e788e1c1ca4e906f9e05d9779fd63b.tar.gz kernel_samsung_crespo-05133fc498e788e1c1ca4e906f9e05d9779fd63b.tar.bz2 |
[PATCH] swabb.h warning fixes
In file included from drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_hw.c:38:
include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h:96: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h:110: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
In file included from drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_v4l.c:36:
include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h:96: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h:110: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
In file included from drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_av.c:37:
include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h:96: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h:110: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
drivers/isdn/icn/icn.c:719:4: warning: #warning TODO test headroom or use skb->nb to flag ACK
In file included from drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_ca.c:39:
include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h:96: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h:110: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
In file included from drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110.c:41:
include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h:96: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h:110: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function return type
Does declaring a function to return a const value actually mean something to
gcc?
Dunno. Kill it and replace sone `__inline__'s with `inline' too.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/byteorder')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h | 17 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h b/include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h index d28d9a8..d5f2a32 100644 --- a/include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h +++ b/include/linux/byteorder/swabb.h @@ -92,29 +92,32 @@ #endif /* OPTIMIZE */ -static __inline__ __const__ __u32 __fswahw32(__u32 x) +static inline __u32 __fswahw32(__u32 x) { return __arch__swahw32(x); } -static __inline__ __u32 __swahw32p(__u32 *x) + +static inline __u32 __swahw32p(__u32 *x) { return __arch__swahw32p(x); } -static __inline__ void __swahw32s(__u32 *addr) + +static inline void __swahw32s(__u32 *addr) { __arch__swahw32s(addr); } - -static __inline__ __const__ __u32 __fswahb32(__u32 x) +static inline __u32 __fswahb32(__u32 x) { return __arch__swahb32(x); } -static __inline__ __u32 __swahb32p(__u32 *x) + +static inline __u32 __swahb32p(__u32 *x) { return __arch__swahb32p(x); } -static __inline__ void __swahb32s(__u32 *addr) + +static inline void __swahb32s(__u32 *addr) { __arch__swahb32s(addr); } |