diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.osdl.org> | 2006-11-14 15:20:51 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.osdl.org> | 2006-11-14 15:20:51 -0800 |
| commit | 9a3a04ac386f44175b6a4142eaeab3d4170a57f3 (patch) | |
| tree | b07590ec50da7d079b1c2852ccc79cbcd8fb2cce /kernel/fork.c | |
| parent | dc791d479802a784836a236d4a77a5325be545c4 (diff) | |
| download | kernel_samsung_espresso10-9a3a04ac386f44175b6a4142eaeab3d4170a57f3.zip kernel_samsung_espresso10-9a3a04ac386f44175b6a4142eaeab3d4170a57f3.tar.gz kernel_samsung_espresso10-9a3a04ac386f44175b6a4142eaeab3d4170a57f3.tar.bz2 | |
Revert "[PATCH] fix Data Acess error in dup_fd"
This reverts commit 0130b0b32ee53dc7add773fcea984f6a26ef1da3.
Sergey Vlasov points out (and Vadim Lobanov concurs) that the bug it was
supposed to fix must be some unrelated memory corruption, and the "fix"
actually causes more problems:
"However, the new code does not look safe in all cases. If some other
task has opened more files while dup_fd() released oldf->file_lock, the
new code will update open_files to the new larger value. But newf was
allocated with the old smaller value of open_files, therefore subsequent
accesses to newf may try to write into unallocated memory."
so revert it.
Cc: Sharyathi Nagesh <sharyath@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
Cc: Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@speakeasy.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/fork.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/fork.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index 4b4eab2..3da978e 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -687,7 +687,6 @@ static struct files_struct *dup_fd(struct files_struct *oldf, int *errorp) * the latest pointer. */ spin_lock(&oldf->file_lock); - open_files = count_open_files(old_fdt); old_fdt = files_fdtable(oldf); } |