aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCon Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>2005-09-10 00:26:08 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@g5.osdl.org>2005-09-10 10:06:22 -0700
commitfc38ed7531eefa332c8c69ee288487860cd6b426 (patch)
treed358d26559cc33c5d4ef2ed2f9cef8cf2b8ed3ae /kernel
parenta7482a2e7775d163aecd8c95af7bb1b8c83890cc (diff)
downloadkernel_samsung_espresso10-fc38ed7531eefa332c8c69ee288487860cd6b426.zip
kernel_samsung_espresso10-fc38ed7531eefa332c8c69ee288487860cd6b426.tar.gz
kernel_samsung_espresso10-fc38ed7531eefa332c8c69ee288487860cd6b426.tar.bz2
[PATCH] sched: run SCHED_NORMAL tasks with real time tasks on SMT siblings
The hyperthread aware nice handling currently puts to sleep any non real time task when a real time task is running on its sibling cpu. This can lead to prolonged starvation by having the non real time task pegged to the cpu with load balancing not pulling that task away. Currently we force lower priority hyperthread tasks to run a percentage of time difference based on timeslice differences which is meaningless when comparing real time tasks to SCHED_NORMAL tasks. We can allow non real time tasks to run with real time tasks on the sibling up to per_cpu_gain% if we use jiffies as a counter. Cleanups and micro-optimisations to the relevant code section should make it more understandable as well. Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched.c65
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 15db821..ef748e6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2580,6 +2580,13 @@ out:
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
+static inline void wakeup_busy_runqueue(runqueue_t *rq)
+{
+ /* If an SMT runqueue is sleeping due to priority reasons wake it up */
+ if (rq->curr == rq->idle && rq->nr_running)
+ resched_task(rq->idle);
+}
+
static inline void wake_sleeping_dependent(int this_cpu, runqueue_t *this_rq)
{
struct sched_domain *tmp, *sd = NULL;
@@ -2613,12 +2620,7 @@ static inline void wake_sleeping_dependent(int this_cpu, runqueue_t *this_rq)
for_each_cpu_mask(i, sibling_map) {
runqueue_t *smt_rq = cpu_rq(i);
- /*
- * If an SMT sibling task is sleeping due to priority
- * reasons wake it up now.
- */
- if (smt_rq->curr == smt_rq->idle && smt_rq->nr_running)
- resched_task(smt_rq->idle);
+ wakeup_busy_runqueue(smt_rq);
}
for_each_cpu_mask(i, sibling_map)
@@ -2672,6 +2674,10 @@ static inline int dependent_sleeper(int this_cpu, runqueue_t *this_rq)
runqueue_t *smt_rq = cpu_rq(i);
task_t *smt_curr = smt_rq->curr;
+ /* Kernel threads do not participate in dependent sleeping */
+ if (!p->mm || !smt_curr->mm || rt_task(p))
+ goto check_smt_task;
+
/*
* If a user task with lower static priority than the
* running task on the SMT sibling is trying to schedule,
@@ -2680,21 +2686,44 @@ static inline int dependent_sleeper(int this_cpu, runqueue_t *this_rq)
* task from using an unfair proportion of the
* physical cpu's resources. -ck
*/
- if (((smt_curr->time_slice * (100 - sd->per_cpu_gain) / 100) >
- task_timeslice(p) || rt_task(smt_curr)) &&
- p->mm && smt_curr->mm && !rt_task(p))
- ret = 1;
+ if (rt_task(smt_curr)) {
+ /*
+ * With real time tasks we run non-rt tasks only
+ * per_cpu_gain% of the time.
+ */
+ if ((jiffies % DEF_TIMESLICE) >
+ (sd->per_cpu_gain * DEF_TIMESLICE / 100))
+ ret = 1;
+ } else
+ if (((smt_curr->time_slice * (100 - sd->per_cpu_gain) /
+ 100) > task_timeslice(p)))
+ ret = 1;
+
+check_smt_task:
+ if ((!smt_curr->mm && smt_curr != smt_rq->idle) ||
+ rt_task(smt_curr))
+ continue;
+ if (!p->mm) {
+ wakeup_busy_runqueue(smt_rq);
+ continue;
+ }
/*
- * Reschedule a lower priority task on the SMT sibling,
- * or wake it up if it has been put to sleep for priority
- * reasons.
+ * Reschedule a lower priority task on the SMT sibling for
+ * it to be put to sleep, or wake it up if it has been put to
+ * sleep for priority reasons to see if it should run now.
*/
- if ((((p->time_slice * (100 - sd->per_cpu_gain) / 100) >
- task_timeslice(smt_curr) || rt_task(p)) &&
- smt_curr->mm && p->mm && !rt_task(smt_curr)) ||
- (smt_curr == smt_rq->idle && smt_rq->nr_running))
- resched_task(smt_curr);
+ if (rt_task(p)) {
+ if ((jiffies % DEF_TIMESLICE) >
+ (sd->per_cpu_gain * DEF_TIMESLICE / 100))
+ resched_task(smt_curr);
+ } else {
+ if ((p->time_slice * (100 - sd->per_cpu_gain) / 100) >
+ task_timeslice(smt_curr))
+ resched_task(smt_curr);
+ else
+ wakeup_busy_runqueue(smt_rq);
+ }
}
out_unlock:
for_each_cpu_mask(i, sibling_map)