aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>2007-03-19 17:04:56 -0700
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net>2007-03-20 00:09:46 -0700
commite4ce837de96d58509f5f815ab37a46889788e701 (patch)
tree573d9e2b11fb0b15e93089a2c32c42e3d162f718
parent749bf9215ed1a8b6edb4bb03693c2b62c6b9c2a4 (diff)
downloadkernel_samsung_smdk4412-e4ce837de96d58509f5f815ab37a46889788e701.zip
kernel_samsung_smdk4412-e4ce837de96d58509f5f815ab37a46889788e701.tar.gz
kernel_samsung_smdk4412-e4ce837de96d58509f5f815ab37a46889788e701.tar.bz2
[X25] x25_forward_call(): fix NULL dereferences
This patch fixes two NULL dereferences spotted by the Coverity checker. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r--net/x25/x25_forward.c88
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 43 deletions
diff --git a/net/x25/x25_forward.c b/net/x25/x25_forward.c
index d339e0c..8738ec7 100644
--- a/net/x25/x25_forward.c
+++ b/net/x25/x25_forward.c
@@ -26,64 +26,66 @@ int x25_forward_call(struct x25_address *dest_addr, struct x25_neigh *from,
short same_lci = 0;
int rc = 0;
- if ((rt = x25_get_route(dest_addr)) != NULL) {
+ if ((rt = x25_get_route(dest_addr)) == NULL)
+ goto out_no_route;
- if ((neigh_new = x25_get_neigh(rt->dev)) == NULL) {
- /* This shouldnt happen, if it occurs somehow
- * do something sensible
- */
- goto out_put_route;
- }
-
- /* Avoid a loop. This is the normal exit path for a
- * system with only one x.25 iface and default route
+ if ((neigh_new = x25_get_neigh(rt->dev)) == NULL) {
+ /* This shouldnt happen, if it occurs somehow
+ * do something sensible
*/
- if (rt->dev == from->dev) {
- goto out_put_nb;
- }
+ goto out_put_route;
+ }
- /* Remote end sending a call request on an already
- * established LCI? It shouldnt happen, just in case..
- */
- read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
- list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) {
- x25_frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node);
- if (x25_frwd->lci == lci) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "X.25: call request for lci which is already registered!, transmitting but not registering new pair\n");
- same_lci = 1;
- }
- }
- read_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
-
- /* Save the forwarding details for future traffic */
- if (!same_lci){
- if ((new_frwd = kmalloc(sizeof(struct x25_forward),
- GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
- rc = -ENOMEM;
- goto out_put_nb;
- }
- new_frwd->lci = lci;
- new_frwd->dev1 = rt->dev;
- new_frwd->dev2 = from->dev;
- write_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
- list_add(&new_frwd->node, &x25_forward_list);
- write_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+ /* Avoid a loop. This is the normal exit path for a
+ * system with only one x.25 iface and default route
+ */
+ if (rt->dev == from->dev) {
+ goto out_put_nb;
+ }
+
+ /* Remote end sending a call request on an already
+ * established LCI? It shouldnt happen, just in case..
+ */
+ read_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+ list_for_each(entry, &x25_forward_list) {
+ x25_frwd = list_entry(entry, struct x25_forward, node);
+ if (x25_frwd->lci == lci) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "X.25: call request for lci which is already registered!, transmitting but not registering new pair\n");
+ same_lci = 1;
}
+ }
+ read_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
- /* Forward the call request */
- if ( (skbn = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
+ /* Save the forwarding details for future traffic */
+ if (!same_lci){
+ if ((new_frwd = kmalloc(sizeof(struct x25_forward),
+ GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
+ rc = -ENOMEM;
goto out_put_nb;
}
- x25_transmit_link(skbn, neigh_new);
- rc = 1;
+ new_frwd->lci = lci;
+ new_frwd->dev1 = rt->dev;
+ new_frwd->dev2 = from->dev;
+ write_lock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
+ list_add(&new_frwd->node, &x25_forward_list);
+ write_unlock_bh(&x25_forward_list_lock);
}
+ /* Forward the call request */
+ if ( (skbn = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL){
+ goto out_put_nb;
+ }
+ x25_transmit_link(skbn, neigh_new);
+ rc = 1;
+
out_put_nb:
x25_neigh_put(neigh_new);
out_put_route:
x25_route_put(rt);
+
+out_no_route:
return rc;
}