Generic semaphore implementation

Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C
implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and
extensibility.  Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep
warning.  Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the
unlikely() was unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

2 files changed, 1 insertions, 149 deletions

diff --git a/arch/avr32/kernel/Makefile b/arch/avr32/kernel/Makefile
index e4b6d12..18229d0 100644
--- a/arch/avr32/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/avr32/kernel/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ extra-y				:= head.o vmlinux.lds
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_SUBARCH_AVR32B)	+= entry-avr32b.o
 obj-y				+= syscall_table.o syscall-stubs.o irq.o
-obj-y				+= setup.o traps.o semaphore.o ocd.o ptrace.o
+obj-y				+= setup.o traps.o ocd.o ptrace.o
 obj-y				+= signal.o sys_avr32.o process.o time.o
 obj-y				+= init_task.o switch_to.o cpu.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)		+= module.o avr32_ksyms.o
diff --git a/arch/avr32/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/avr32/kernel/semaphore.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 1e2705a..0000000
--- a/arch/avr32/kernel/semaphore.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,148 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * AVR32 sempahore implementation.
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Atmel Corporation
- *
- * Based on linux/arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c
- *  Copyright (C) 1999 Linus Torvalds
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
- */
-
-#include <linux/sched.h>
-#include <linux/errno.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
-
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-#include <asm/atomic.h>
-
-/*
- * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter:
- * The "count" variable is decremented for each process
- * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping"
- * variable is a count of such acquires.
- *
- * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can
- * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up
- * needs to do something only if count was negative before
- * the increment operation.
- *
- * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected
- * by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head.
- *
- * Note that these functions are only called when there is
- * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the
- * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The
- * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h>
- * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
- */
-
-/*
- * Logic:
- *  - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go
- *    from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up.
- *  - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we
- *    (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure
- *    that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that
- *    we cannot lose wakeup events.
- */
-
-void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	wake_up(&sem->wait);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);
-
-void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-        DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-        unsigned long flags;
-
-        tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-        spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-        add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-        sem->sleepers++;
-        for (;;) {
-                int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
-
-                /*
-                 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
-                 * playing, because we own the spinlock in
-                 * the wait_queue_head.
-                 */
-                if (atomic_add_return(sleepers - 1, &sem->count) >= 0) {
-                        sem->sleepers = 0;
-                        break;
-                }
-                sem->sleepers = 1;      /* us - see -1 above */
-                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-                schedule();
-
-                spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-                tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
-        }
-        remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-        wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
-        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-        tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);
-
-int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem)
-{
-	int retval = 0;
-	struct task_struct *tsk = current;
-        DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
-        unsigned long flags;
-
-        tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-        spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-        add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-
-        sem->sleepers++;
-        for (;;) {
-                int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
-
-		/*
-		 * With signals pending, this turns into the trylock
-		 * failure case - we won't be sleeping, and we can't
-		 * get the lock as it has contention. Just correct the
-		 * count and exit.
-		 */
-		if (signal_pending(current)) {
-			retval = -EINTR;
-			sem->sleepers = 0;
-			atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count);
-			break;
-		}
-
-                /*
-                 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
-                 * playing, because we own the spinlock in
-                 * the wait_queue_head.
-                 */
-                if (atomic_add_return(sleepers - 1, &sem->count) >= 0) {
-                        sem->sleepers = 0;
-                        break;
-                }
-                sem->sleepers = 1;      /* us - see -1 above */
-                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-                schedule();
-
-                spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-                tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
-        }
-        remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
-        wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
-        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
-
-        tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
-	return retval;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);