diff options
author | Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@gmail.com> | 2013-04-01 09:47:56 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> | 2013-04-05 10:16:51 -0700 |
commit | 582b4c3dc62284aec367a3f4f74ce8101303e9c4 (patch) | |
tree | a6c222480f25f8cb9bfebabf6fd95684cfc62343 /drivers | |
parent | 956fc762ae9fb5f8cf6cd456f508ad431a4653b7 (diff) | |
download | kernel_samsung_smdk4412-582b4c3dc62284aec367a3f4f74ce8101303e9c4.zip kernel_samsung_smdk4412-582b4c3dc62284aec367a3f4f74ce8101303e9c4.tar.gz kernel_samsung_smdk4412-582b4c3dc62284aec367a3f4f74ce8101303e9c4.tar.bz2 |
loop: prevent bdev freeing while device in use
commit c1681bf8a7b1b98edee8b862a42c19c4e53205fd upstream.
struct block_device lifecycle is defined by its inode (see fs/block_dev.c) -
block_device allocated first time we access /dev/loopXX and deallocated on
bdev_destroy_inode. When we create the device "losetup /dev/loopXX afile"
we want that block_device stay alive until we destroy the loop device
with "losetup -d".
But because we do not hold /dev/loopXX inode its counter goes 0, and
inode/bdev can be destroyed at any moment. Usually it happens at memory
pressure or when user drops inode cache (like in the test below). When later in
loop_clr_fd() we want to use bdev we have use-after-free error with following
stack:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000280
bd_set_size+0x10/0xa0
loop_clr_fd+0x1f8/0x420 [loop]
lo_ioctl+0x200/0x7e0 [loop]
lo_compat_ioctl+0x47/0xe0 [loop]
compat_blkdev_ioctl+0x341/0x1290
do_filp_open+0x42/0xa0
compat_sys_ioctl+0xc1/0xf20
do_sys_open+0x16e/0x1d0
sysenter_dispatch+0x7/0x1a
To prevent use-after-free we need to grab the device in loop_set_fd()
and put it later in loop_clr_fd().
The issue is reprodusible on current Linus head and v3.3. Here is the test:
dd if=/dev/zero of=loop.file bs=1M count=1
while [ true ]; do
losetup /dev/loop0 loop.file
echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
losetup -d /dev/loop0
done
[ Doing bdgrab/bput in loop_set_fd/loop_clr_fd is safe, because every
time we call loop_set_fd() we check that loop_device->lo_state is
Lo_unbound and set it to Lo_bound If somebody will try to set_fd again
it will get EBUSY. And if we try to loop_clr_fd() on unbound loop
device we'll get ENXIO.
loop_set_fd/loop_clr_fd (and any other loop ioctl) is called under
loop_device->lo_ctl_mutex. ]
Signed-off-by: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/block/loop.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c index 258cd0a..38f8da9 100644 --- a/drivers/block/loop.c +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c @@ -928,6 +928,11 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t mode, wake_up_process(lo->lo_thread); if (max_part > 0) ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0); + + /* Grab the block_device to prevent its destruction after we + * put /dev/loopXX inode. Later in loop_clr_fd() we bdput(bdev). + */ + bdgrab(bdev); return 0; out_clr: @@ -1024,8 +1029,10 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct block_device *bdev) memset(lo->lo_encrypt_key, 0, LO_KEY_SIZE); memset(lo->lo_crypt_name, 0, LO_NAME_SIZE); memset(lo->lo_file_name, 0, LO_NAME_SIZE); - if (bdev) + if (bdev) { + bdput(bdev); invalidate_bdev(bdev); + } set_capacity(lo->lo_disk, 0); loop_sysfs_exit(lo); if (bdev) { |