diff options
| author | Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com> | 2007-06-04 19:05:57 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@sunset.davemloft.net> | 2007-06-07 13:42:46 -0700 |
| commit | 4aa2e62c45b5ca08be2d0d3c0744d7585b56e860 (patch) | |
| tree | 16649593d55f3df4dac54227fcda28bb4fb49f17 /net/key/af_key.c | |
| parent | b00b4bf94edb42852d55619af453588b2de2dc5e (diff) | |
| download | kernel_samsung_smdk4412-4aa2e62c45b5ca08be2d0d3c0744d7585b56e860.zip kernel_samsung_smdk4412-4aa2e62c45b5ca08be2d0d3c0744d7585b56e860.tar.gz kernel_samsung_smdk4412-4aa2e62c45b5ca08be2d0d3c0744d7585b56e860.tar.bz2 | |
xfrm: Add security check before flushing SAD/SPD
Currently we check for permission before deleting entries from SAD and
SPD, (see security_xfrm_policy_delete() security_xfrm_state_delete())
However we are not checking for authorization when flushing the SPD and
the SAD completely. It was perhaps missed in the original security hooks
patch.
This patch adds a security check when flushing entries from the SAD and
SPD. It runs the entire database and checks each entry for a denial.
If the process attempting the flush is unable to remove all of the
entries a denial is logged the the flush function returns an error
without removing anything.
This is particularly useful when a process may need to create or delete
its own xfrm entries used for things like labeled networking but that
same process should not be able to delete other entries or flush the
entire database.
Signed-off-by: Joy Latten<latten@austin.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/key/af_key.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/key/af_key.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/net/key/af_key.c b/net/key/af_key.c index d302dda..0f8304b 100644 --- a/net/key/af_key.c +++ b/net/key/af_key.c @@ -1682,6 +1682,7 @@ static int pfkey_flush(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, struct sadb_msg *hd unsigned proto; struct km_event c; struct xfrm_audit audit_info; + int err; proto = pfkey_satype2proto(hdr->sadb_msg_satype); if (proto == 0) @@ -1689,7 +1690,9 @@ static int pfkey_flush(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, struct sadb_msg *hd audit_info.loginuid = audit_get_loginuid(current->audit_context); audit_info.secid = 0; - xfrm_state_flush(proto, &audit_info); + err = xfrm_state_flush(proto, &audit_info); + if (err) + return err; c.data.proto = proto; c.seq = hdr->sadb_msg_seq; c.pid = hdr->sadb_msg_pid; @@ -2683,10 +2686,13 @@ static int pfkey_spdflush(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, struct sadb_msg { struct km_event c; struct xfrm_audit audit_info; + int err; audit_info.loginuid = audit_get_loginuid(current->audit_context); audit_info.secid = 0; - xfrm_policy_flush(XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN, &audit_info); + err = xfrm_policy_flush(XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN, &audit_info); + if (err) + return err; c.data.type = XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_MAIN; c.event = XFRM_MSG_FLUSHPOLICY; c.pid = hdr->sadb_msg_pid; |