diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/seqlock.h | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/hung_task.c | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/lockdep.c | 206 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/Kconfig.debug | 15 |
4 files changed, 213 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/seqlock.h b/include/linux/seqlock.h index e98cd2e..06d6964 100644 --- a/include/linux/seqlock.h +++ b/include/linux/seqlock.h @@ -88,12 +88,12 @@ static __always_inline unsigned read_seqbegin(const seqlock_t *sl) unsigned ret; repeat: - ret = sl->sequence; - smp_rmb(); + ret = ACCESS_ONCE(sl->sequence); if (unlikely(ret & 1)) { cpu_relax(); goto repeat; } + smp_rmb(); return ret; } diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c index 53ead17..ea64012 100644 --- a/kernel/hung_task.c +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ unsigned long __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_check_count = PID_MAX_LIMIT; /* * Zero means infinite timeout - no checking done: */ -unsigned long __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs = 120; +unsigned long __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs = CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT; unsigned long __read_mostly sysctl_hung_task_warnings = 10; diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c index 53a6895..63437d0 100644 --- a/kernel/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/lockdep.c @@ -490,6 +490,18 @@ void get_usage_chars(struct lock_class *class, char usage[LOCK_USAGE_CHARS]) usage[i] = '\0'; } +static int __print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class) +{ + char str[KSYM_NAME_LEN]; + const char *name; + + name = class->name; + if (!name) + name = __get_key_name(class->key, str); + + return printk("%s", name); +} + static void print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class) { char str[KSYM_NAME_LEN], usage[LOCK_USAGE_CHARS]; @@ -1053,6 +1065,56 @@ print_circular_bug_entry(struct lock_list *target, int depth) return 0; } +static void +print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src, + struct held_lock *tgt, + struct lock_list *prt) +{ + struct lock_class *source = hlock_class(src); + struct lock_class *target = hlock_class(tgt); + struct lock_class *parent = prt->class; + + /* + * A direct locking problem where unsafe_class lock is taken + * directly by safe_class lock, then all we need to show + * is the deadlock scenario, as it is obvious that the + * unsafe lock is taken under the safe lock. + * + * But if there is a chain instead, where the safe lock takes + * an intermediate lock (middle_class) where this lock is + * not the same as the safe lock, then the lock chain is + * used to describe the problem. Otherwise we would need + * to show a different CPU case for each link in the chain + * from the safe_class lock to the unsafe_class lock. + */ + if (parent != source) { + printk("Chain exists of:\n "); + __print_lock_name(source); + printk(" --> "); + __print_lock_name(parent); + printk(" --> "); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk("\n\n"); + } + + printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n"); + printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n"); + printk(" ---- ----\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk(");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(parent); + printk(");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(target); + printk(");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(source); + printk(");\n"); + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); +} + /* * When a circular dependency is detected, print the * header first: @@ -1096,6 +1158,7 @@ static noinline int print_circular_bug(struct lock_list *this, { struct task_struct *curr = current; struct lock_list *parent; + struct lock_list *first_parent; int depth; if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent) @@ -1109,6 +1172,7 @@ static noinline int print_circular_bug(struct lock_list *this, print_circular_bug_header(target, depth, check_src, check_tgt); parent = get_lock_parent(target); + first_parent = parent; while (parent) { print_circular_bug_entry(parent, --depth); @@ -1116,6 +1180,9 @@ static noinline int print_circular_bug(struct lock_list *this, } printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n"); + print_circular_lock_scenario(check_src, check_tgt, + first_parent); + lockdep_print_held_locks(curr); printk("\nstack backtrace:\n"); @@ -1314,7 +1381,7 @@ print_shortest_lock_dependencies(struct lock_list *leaf, printk("\n"); if (depth == 0 && (entry != root)) { - printk("lockdep:%s bad BFS generated tree\n", __func__); + printk("lockdep:%s bad path found in chain graph\n", __func__); break; } @@ -1325,6 +1392,62 @@ print_shortest_lock_dependencies(struct lock_list *leaf, return; } +static void +print_irq_lock_scenario(struct lock_list *safe_entry, + struct lock_list *unsafe_entry, + struct lock_class *prev_class, + struct lock_class *next_class) +{ + struct lock_class *safe_class = safe_entry->class; + struct lock_class *unsafe_class = unsafe_entry->class; + struct lock_class *middle_class = prev_class; + + if (middle_class == safe_class) + middle_class = next_class; + + /* + * A direct locking problem where unsafe_class lock is taken + * directly by safe_class lock, then all we need to show + * is the deadlock scenario, as it is obvious that the + * unsafe lock is taken under the safe lock. + * + * But if there is a chain instead, where the safe lock takes + * an intermediate lock (middle_class) where this lock is + * not the same as the safe lock, then the lock chain is + * used to describe the problem. Otherwise we would need + * to show a different CPU case for each link in the chain + * from the safe_class lock to the unsafe_class lock. + */ + if (middle_class != unsafe_class) { + printk("Chain exists of:\n "); + __print_lock_name(safe_class); + printk(" --> "); + __print_lock_name(middle_class); + printk(" --> "); + __print_lock_name(unsafe_class); + printk("\n\n"); + } + + printk(" Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:\n\n"); + printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n"); + printk(" ---- ----\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(unsafe_class); + printk(");\n"); + printk(" local_irq_disable();\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(safe_class); + printk(");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(middle_class); + printk(");\n"); + printk(" <Interrupt>\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(safe_class); + printk(");\n"); + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); +} + static int print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr, struct lock_list *prev_root, @@ -1376,6 +1499,9 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr, print_stack_trace(forwards_entry->class->usage_traces + bit2, 1); printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n"); + print_irq_lock_scenario(backwards_entry, forwards_entry, + hlock_class(prev), hlock_class(next)); + lockdep_print_held_locks(curr); printk("\nthe dependencies between %s-irq-safe lock", irqclass); @@ -1539,6 +1665,26 @@ static inline void inc_chains(void) #endif +static void +print_deadlock_scenario(struct held_lock *nxt, + struct held_lock *prv) +{ + struct lock_class *next = hlock_class(nxt); + struct lock_class *prev = hlock_class(prv); + + printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n"); + printk(" CPU0\n"); + printk(" ----\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(prev); + printk(");\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(next); + printk(");\n"); + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); + printk(" May be due to missing lock nesting notation\n\n"); +} + static int print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, struct held_lock *next) @@ -1557,6 +1703,7 @@ print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, print_lock(prev); printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n"); + print_deadlock_scenario(next, prev); lockdep_print_held_locks(curr); printk("\nstack backtrace:\n"); @@ -1826,7 +1973,7 @@ static inline int lookup_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr, struct list_head *hash_head = chainhashentry(chain_key); struct lock_chain *chain; struct held_lock *hlock_curr, *hlock_next; - int i, j, n, cn; + int i, j; if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled())) return 0; @@ -1886,15 +2033,9 @@ cache_hit: } i++; chain->depth = curr->lockdep_depth + 1 - i; - cn = nr_chain_hlocks; - while (cn + chain->depth <= MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS) { - n = cmpxchg(&nr_chain_hlocks, cn, cn + chain->depth); - if (n == cn) - break; - cn = n; - } - if (likely(cn + chain->depth <= MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS)) { - chain->base = cn; + if (likely(nr_chain_hlocks + chain->depth <= MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS)) { + chain->base = nr_chain_hlocks; + nr_chain_hlocks += chain->depth; for (j = 0; j < chain->depth - 1; j++, i++) { int lock_id = curr->held_locks[i].class_idx - 1; chain_hlocks[chain->base + j] = lock_id; @@ -2011,6 +2152,24 @@ static void check_chain_key(struct task_struct *curr) #endif } +static void +print_usage_bug_scenario(struct held_lock *lock) +{ + struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(lock); + + printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n"); + printk(" CPU0\n"); + printk(" ----\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(class); + printk(");\n"); + printk(" <Interrupt>\n"); + printk(" lock("); + __print_lock_name(class); + printk(");\n"); + printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); +} + static int print_usage_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, enum lock_usage_bit prev_bit, enum lock_usage_bit new_bit) @@ -2039,6 +2198,8 @@ print_usage_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, print_irqtrace_events(curr); printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n"); + print_usage_bug_scenario(this); + lockdep_print_held_locks(curr); printk("\nstack backtrace:\n"); @@ -2073,6 +2234,10 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, int forwards, const char *irqclass) { + struct lock_list *entry = other; + struct lock_list *middle = NULL; + int depth; + if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent) return 0; @@ -2091,6 +2256,25 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr, printk("\n\nand interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.\n\n"); printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n"); + + /* Find a middle lock (if one exists) */ + depth = get_lock_depth(other); + do { + if (depth == 0 && (entry != root)) { + printk("lockdep:%s bad path found in chain graph\n", __func__); + break; + } + middle = entry; + entry = get_lock_parent(entry); + depth--; + } while (entry && entry != root && (depth >= 0)); + if (forwards) + print_irq_lock_scenario(root, other, + middle ? middle->class : root->class, other->class); + else + print_irq_lock_scenario(other, root, + middle ? middle->class : other->class, root->class); + lockdep_print_held_locks(curr); printk("\nthe shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock:\n"); diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index 17ac5f8..9b1707b 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -238,6 +238,21 @@ config DETECT_HUNG_TASK enabled then all held locks will also be reported. This feature has negligible overhead. +config DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT + int "Default timeout for hung task detection (in seconds)" + depends on DETECT_HUNG_TASK + default 120 + help + This option controls the default timeout (in seconds) used + to determine when a task has become non-responsive and should + be considered hung. + + It can be adjusted at runtime via the kernel.hung_task_timeout + sysctl or by writing a value to /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout. + + A timeout of 0 disables the check. The default is two minutes. + Keeping the default should be fine in most cases. + config BOOTPARAM_HUNG_TASK_PANIC bool "Panic (Reboot) On Hung Tasks" depends on DETECT_HUNG_TASK |