diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/namei.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/namei.c | 119 |
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 64 deletions
@@ -595,15 +595,16 @@ int follow_up(struct path *path) { struct vfsmount *parent; struct dentry *mountpoint; - spin_lock(&vfsmount_lock); + + br_read_lock(vfsmount_lock); parent = path->mnt->mnt_parent; if (parent == path->mnt) { - spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock); + br_read_unlock(vfsmount_lock); return 0; } mntget(parent); mountpoint = dget(path->mnt->mnt_mountpoint); - spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock); + br_read_unlock(vfsmount_lock); dput(path->dentry); path->dentry = mountpoint; mntput(path->mnt); @@ -686,6 +687,35 @@ static __always_inline void follow_dotdot(struct nameidata *nd) } /* + * Allocate a dentry with name and parent, and perform a parent + * directory ->lookup on it. Returns the new dentry, or ERR_PTR + * on error. parent->d_inode->i_mutex must be held. d_lookup must + * have verified that no child exists while under i_mutex. + */ +static struct dentry *d_alloc_and_lookup(struct dentry *parent, + struct qstr *name, struct nameidata *nd) +{ + struct inode *inode = parent->d_inode; + struct dentry *dentry; + struct dentry *old; + + /* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */ + if (unlikely(IS_DEADDIR(inode))) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); + + dentry = d_alloc(parent, name); + if (unlikely(!dentry)) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + old = inode->i_op->lookup(inode, dentry, nd); + if (unlikely(old)) { + dput(dentry); + dentry = old; + } + return dentry; +} + +/* * It's more convoluted than I'd like it to be, but... it's still fairly * small and for now I'd prefer to have fast path as straight as possible. * It _is_ time-critical. @@ -706,9 +736,15 @@ static int do_lookup(struct nameidata *nd, struct qstr *name, return err; } + /* + * Rename seqlock is not required here because in the off chance + * of a false negative due to a concurrent rename, we're going to + * do the non-racy lookup, below. + */ dentry = __d_lookup(nd->path.dentry, name); if (!dentry) goto need_lookup; +found: if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate) goto need_revalidate; done: @@ -724,56 +760,28 @@ need_lookup: mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex); /* * First re-do the cached lookup just in case it was created - * while we waited for the directory semaphore.. + * while we waited for the directory semaphore, or the first + * lookup failed due to an unrelated rename. * - * FIXME! This could use version numbering or similar to - * avoid unnecessary cache lookups. - * - * The "dcache_lock" is purely to protect the RCU list walker - * from concurrent renames at this point (we mustn't get false - * negatives from the RCU list walk here, unlike the optimistic - * fast walk). - * - * so doing d_lookup() (with seqlock), instead of lockfree __d_lookup + * This could use version numbering or similar to avoid unnecessary + * cache lookups, but then we'd have to do the first lookup in the + * non-racy way. However in the common case here, everything should + * be hot in cache, so would it be a big win? */ dentry = d_lookup(parent, name); - if (!dentry) { - struct dentry *new; - - /* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */ - dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); - if (IS_DEADDIR(dir)) - goto out_unlock; - - new = d_alloc(parent, name); - dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - if (new) { - dentry = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, new, nd); - if (dentry) - dput(new); - else - dentry = new; - } -out_unlock: + if (likely(!dentry)) { + dentry = d_alloc_and_lookup(parent, name, nd); mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex); if (IS_ERR(dentry)) goto fail; goto done; } - /* * Uhhuh! Nasty case: the cache was re-populated while * we waited on the semaphore. Need to revalidate. */ mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex); - if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate) { - dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd); - if (!dentry) - dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); - } - if (IS_ERR(dentry)) - goto fail; - goto done; + goto found; need_revalidate: dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd); @@ -1130,35 +1138,18 @@ static struct dentry *__lookup_hash(struct qstr *name, goto out; } - dentry = __d_lookup(base, name); - - /* lockess __d_lookup may fail due to concurrent d_move() - * in some unrelated directory, so try with d_lookup + /* + * Don't bother with __d_lookup: callers are for creat as + * well as unlink, so a lot of the time it would cost + * a double lookup. */ - if (!dentry) - dentry = d_lookup(base, name); + dentry = d_lookup(base, name); if (dentry && dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate) dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd); - if (!dentry) { - struct dentry *new; - - /* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */ - dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); - if (IS_DEADDIR(inode)) - goto out; - - new = d_alloc(base, name); - dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - if (!new) - goto out; - dentry = inode->i_op->lookup(inode, new, nd); - if (!dentry) - dentry = new; - else - dput(new); - } + if (!dentry) + dentry = d_alloc_and_lookup(base, name, nd); out: return dentry; } |